{"id": "ca_86QyBqGL", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能读准声母、韵母、声调和整体认读音节", "verb": "认读", "object": "音节", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能正确拼读b-p-m-f等声母与a-o-e等韵母的组合", "能认读zhi、chi、shi等整体认读音节并区分声调"], "assessment": "{{name}}能准确读出这些拼音字母和音节吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 14, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "能读准声母、韵母、声调和整体认读音节。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语音识记，无跨学科概念与科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["声母是需要读准的", "韵母是需要读准的", "声调是需要读准的", "整体认读音节是需要读准的"]}}
{"id": "ca_UiMzwsV6", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能准确地拼读音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节", "verb": "拼读", "object": "音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着拼音卡片准确拼读出‘b-á→bá’等音节", "能在田字格中正确书写‘zh’、‘ch’等声母和‘ang’、‘eng’等韵母"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着拼音卡片拼读出音节，并在本子上正确写出声母和韵母吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 14, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "能准确地拼读音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "拼音拼读与书写属基础技能训练"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["能准确地拼读音节", "正确书写声母", "正确书写韵母", "正确书写音节"]}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_GzaJAaDT", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能借助汉语拼音认读汉字，学会用音序检字法和部首检字法查字典", "verb": "认读", "object": "汉字，学会用音序检字法和部首检字法查字典", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着拼音正确拼读出陌生汉字的发音", "能按字母顺序在字典中找到指定汉字，并说明页码"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着拼音读出这个字，再帮我用字典查出它在哪一页吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 14, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "能借助汉语拼音认读汉字，学会用音序检字法和部首检字法查字典。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "查字典是工具性探究动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["investigating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["能借助汉语拼音认读汉字", "学会用音序检字法查字典", "学会用部首检字法查字典"]}}
{"id": "ca_DpRdKQhF", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "尝试阅读整本书，用自己喜欢的方式向他人介绍读过的书", "verb": "尝试", "object": "阅读整本书，用自己喜欢的方式向他人介绍读过的书", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着书的封面和目录，说出书里大概讲了什么故事", "能用自己的话，把书里最喜欢的一个情节讲给同伴听"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能试着给妈妈讲讲你最近读的那本书里，最有趣的部分吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 15, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "4. 尝试阅读整本书，用自己喜欢的方式向他人介绍读过的书。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "介绍读过的书属于交流信息"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_J2438suE", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用自己的话复述故事大意和感兴趣的情节", "verb": "复述", "object": "故事大意和感兴趣的情节", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能口头说出一个听过的故事的主要内容", "能说出自己最喜欢故事里的哪个部分"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这个故事大概讲了什么，还有你最喜欢其中的哪个部分吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 15, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "听故事、看影视作品，能复述大意和自己感兴趣的情节。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "复述故事属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能复述大意和自己感兴趣的情节", "repair": {"why": "原句能力要求明确，修改后句式统一为'能+动词+对象'，并将证据具体化为可观察行为。", "grounding": 0.87}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.889, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_fVQck8fm", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能较完整地讲述小故事", "verb": "讲述", "object": "小故事", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能按顺序说出故事的起因、经过和结果", "能说出故事中至少两个角色的名字和他们做了什么"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把今天读的故事从头到尾讲给我听吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 15, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能较完整地讲述小故事，能简要讲述自己感兴趣的见闻。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "讲述故事属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_iSbhPL3R", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能较完整地讲述一个小故事，能简要讲述自己感兴趣的见闻", "verb": "讲述", "object": "一个小故事和自己感兴趣的见闻", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着图画书，把故事的起因、经过、结果连贯地说出来", "能指着窗外的树，讲出它春天发芽冬天落叶的变化"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能给妈妈讲讲今天在幼儿园/学校看到的最有趣的事情吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 15, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能较完整地讲述小故事，能简要讲述自己感兴趣的见闻。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "讲述故事与见闻属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能简要讲述自己感兴趣的见闻", "repair": {"why": "将原句中的两个并列能力点完整保留，并明确了‘小故事’和‘见闻’这两个具体对象，使其可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.909, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_erA2N9Q7", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "在写话中乐于运用阅读和生活中学到的词语", "verb": "运用", "object": "阅读和生活中学到的词语", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能主动使用课外书里学到的词语来描述自己的画", "能用生活中的新词（如“兴奋”）来写一句话"], "assessment": "{{name}}最近写话时，有没有用上从书里或生活中学到的新词？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 15, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "在写话中乐于运用阅读和生活中学到的词语。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用词语，非科学实践或通用概念"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_dzBy3RLd", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能就感兴趣的内容提出问题，结合其他学科的学习和生活经验交流讨论，尝试提出自己的看法", "verb": "交流", "object": "讨论，尝试提出自己的看法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能就一篇关于植物生长的课文，提出“阳光对植物叶子颜色有影响吗”的问题。", "能在小组讨论中，结合科学课学的光合作用，解释自己对植物向光生长的看法。"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}：最近读的文章或书里，你有没有结合其他知识想过什么新问题？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 16, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "3. 对周围事物有好奇心，能就感兴趣的内容提出问题，结合其他学科的学习和生活经验交流讨论，尝试提出自己的看法。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标（对周围事物有好奇心）与教学建议（能就感兴趣的内容提出问题）的混合表述，未界定可测评的学生行为终点，且证。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标（对周围事物有好奇心）与教学建议（能就感兴趣的内容提出问题）的混合表述，未界定可测评的学生行为终点，且证据无法直接对应‘结合其他学科’这一宽泛要求。"}}
{"id": "ca_QmDe7iVU", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能默读一段文字，做到不出声，不指读", "verb": "默读", "object": "一段文字", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能默读一段约200字的短文，全程嘴唇和手指都不动", "能默读完后，用自己的话复述出段落大意"], "assessment": "你可以观察一下{{name}}默读时，是不是能做到不出声、不指读呢？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 16, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "初步学会默读，做到不出声，不指读。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "默读是阅读习惯，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "初步学会默读，做到不出声，不指读", "repair": {"why": "将断言中的‘初步学会’改为更具体可观察的‘能’，并明确了‘一段文字’作为对象，使其符合‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的句式要求。", "grounding": 0.73}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.615, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_TbfL76Pw", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "理解词句的意思，体会课文中关键词句表达情意的作用", "verb": "表达", "object": "情意的作用", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能圈出文中直接表达情感的词语，并说明它表达了什么情感", "能模仿课文中的关键句式，写出一个表达类似情感的句子"], "assessment": "{{name}}，读文章时你能说说某个词或句子为什么用得好吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 16, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "2. 能联系上下文，理解词句的意思，体会课文中关键词句表达情意的作用。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，要求‘联系上下文’和‘体会作用’，均非对具体学生能力的可观察描述。无法用‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，要求‘联系上下文’和‘体会作用’，均非对具体学生能力的可观察描述。无法用‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的句式进行客观判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_QKTDSjaA", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能初步把握文章的主要内容，体会文章表达的思想感情", "verb": "表达", "object": "思想感情", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用自己的话复述课文讲了一件什么事", "能说出文章中让自己感动或印象最深的句子，并解释原因"], "assessment": "{{name}}，读完这篇文章后，你能告诉我它主要讲了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 17, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "3. 能初步把握文章的主要内容，体会文章表达的思想感情。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "‘能初步把握文章的主要内容，体会文章表达的思想感情’是第二学段（3-4年级）的课程目标，标注学段G3-G4正确，但原文断言‘能初步把握’与课标原文‘能初步把握’一致，无问题；然而掌握证据中‘能说出文章中让自己感动或印象最深的句子，并解释原因’要求‘解释原因’，更接近第三学段（5-6年级）‘体会作者表达的思想感情’的要求，与标注学段存在能力层级错位。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 32% < 62%），不采纳"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 32% < 62%），不采纳"}
{"id": "ca_q6FLBRxx", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "尝试在习作中运用自己平时积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句", "verb": "尝试", "object": "在习作中运用自己平时积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能主动选用成语或比喻句描述景物，如用‘层林尽染’写秋天景色", "能用不常见的动词替换常用词，如把‘跑过去’写成‘冲过去’"], "assessment": "{{name}}写作文时，有没有用过一些不常用但特别生动的词语或句子？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 17, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "尝试在习作中运用自己平时积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用语言材料进行创造性表达"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_tiTxjznu", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用毛笔书写楷书，在书写中体会汉字的优美", "verb": "书写", "object": "楷书，在书写中体会汉字的优美", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能用毛笔书写楷书，笔画起收有顿笔，结构端正", "能临写一首古诗，字形大小均匀，布局整齐"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用毛笔写出工整的楷书吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 18, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用毛笔书写楷书，在书写中体会汉字的优美。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'能用毛笔书写楷书，笔画起收有顿笔，结构端正'过于笼统，无法判断单个学生是否达到；'能临写一首古诗，字形大小均匀，布局整齐'是具体表现，但作为掌握证据不足以独立证明能力水平"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。'体会汉字的优美'是审美体验，无法通过观察具体行为直接判定为学生是否掌握。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。'体会汉字的优美'是审美体验，无法通过观察具体行为直接判定为学生是否掌握。"}
{"id": "ca_YPNFeDDM", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能简单描述印象最深的场景、人物、细节", "verb": "描述", "object": "印象最深的场景、人物、细节", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能说出书中某个场景中人物的动作或表情", "能指出某处环境描写给自己留下印象的原因"], "assessment": "你可以问{{name}}：读完这本书后，哪个画面或人物让你印象最深，能告诉我为什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 19, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "4. 阅读叙事性作品，了解事件梗概，能简单描述印象最深的场景、人物、细节，说出自己的喜爱、憎恶、崇敬、向往、同情等感受；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：句末谓语是虚动词「感受」：前面的「说出」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定；并列项过多（≥。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：句末谓语是虚动词「感受」：前面的「说出」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定；并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分"}}
{"id": "ca_5JtJ6dvb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "尝试使用多种媒介阅读", "verb": "尝试", "object": "使用多种媒介阅读", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "文化自信"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能从纸质书、电子书和音频中选择同一故事的不同版本进行阅读", "能对比纸质书和电子书在阅读体验上的不同，并说出各自的一个优点"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你平时会用哪些不同的方式来读同一个故事呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 19, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "尝试使用多种媒介阅读。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G5–G6学段标注准确，无问题"}, {"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'尝试使用多种媒介阅读'是课程目标或学习活动，而非可判定学生个体'会/不会'的具体能力点"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "整条断言更像教学活动描述或课程建议，而非可测评的学生能力。'能从…选择'和'能对比…说出'是具体表现，但上位断言本身不是能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_GVBdsUTr", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "乐于表达，与人交流能尊重和理解对方", "verb": "表达", "object": "与人交流能尊重和理解对方", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["在小组讨论时，能认真听完同学发言后再表达自己的不同看法。", "面对与自己观点相反的意见，能用平和的语气说“我理解你的想法，不过我觉得……”。", "你觉得{{name}}最近和同学讨论事情时，是更愿意先听还是更着急说？"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 19, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "乐于表达，与人交流能尊重和理解对方。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘乐于表达，与人交流能尊重和理解对方’是情感态度目标，无法直接判断一个具体孩子‘会/不会’，更像教学导向而非可测评的能力点。"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘乐于表达’是学习态度或习惯，不是具体的语言运用能力。掌握证据中的‘认真听完’、‘平和语气’描述的是行为表现，但核心断言本身更接近课程目标而非学生能力。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_sdP5RiWr", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "参与讨论，敢于发表自己的意见，说清自己的观点", "verb": "讨论", "object": "敢于发表自己的意见，说清自己的观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能在小组讨论中主动举手发言，清晰陈述自己对课文主题的看法", "能针对同学的观点提出不同意见，并用文中具体情节说明理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能主动说出自己的想法，还能用课文里的例子来解释吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 19, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参与讨论，敢于发表自己的意见，说清自己的观点。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应参与的活动和应具备的态度，而非可直接观察和判定的具体能力表现。。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应参与的活动和应具备的态度，而非可直接观察和判定的具体能力表现。"}}
{"id": "ca_4AcQgaPb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能熟练地使用字典、词典独立识字", "verb": "使用", "object": "字典、词典独立识字", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据语境和部首，在字典中快速找到多音字并选择正确读音", "能通过查阅词典，准确理解生僻词语在文中的具体含义"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}，在读到不认识的字词时，是不是会主动去查字典、词典，而且能用对方法？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "1. 能熟练地使用字典、词典独立识字，会用多种检字方法。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "工具使用，非思维或实践类别"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["能熟练地使用字典、词典独立识字", "会用多种检字方法"]}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_dP5ELjxS", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "临摹、欣赏名家书法，体会书法的审美价值", "verb": "临摹", "object": "欣赏名家书法，体会书法的审美价值", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用毛笔临摹一幅名家楷书作品，笔画结构基本准确", "能说出所临摹作品中至少两个字的笔画特点或整体风格"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我你临摹的这幅字哪里写得最像原作吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "临摹、欣赏名家书法，体会书法的审美价值。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘体会书法的审美价值’是目标描述，无法直接判定一个学生‘会不会’"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "课标原句是教学活动建议（临摹、欣赏、体会），而非对学生可观察、可判定能力的描述。其中的‘体会…审美价值’是内在感受，无法直接判定一个学生‘会不会’，且无法仅用原句信息改写为符合‘能+动词+对象’的具体能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：课标原句是教学活动建议（临摹、欣赏、体会），而非对学生可观察、可判定能力的描述。其中的‘体会…审美价值’是内在感受，无法直接判定一个学生‘会不会’，且无法仅用原"}
{"id": "ca_ZrSbtGS6", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能较熟练地运用略读和浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围", "verb": "运用", "object": "略读和浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能快速浏览一篇陌生文章并准确说出其主要内容和结构", "能在规定时间内阅读多篇不同题材的文章并提取关键信息"], "assessment": "你观察{{name}}读课外书时，他能很快抓住书的重点吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能较熟练地运用略读和浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定阅读目的并获取信息"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_N6kuHVHw", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能区分写实作品与虚构作品", "verb": "区分", "object": "写实作品与虚构作品", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能指出一篇新闻报道是写实作品，并说明其基于真实事件", "能判断一篇童话是虚构作品，并解释其中包含想象的人物或情节"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇课文是写实的还是虚构的，为什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能区分写实作品与虚构作品，了解诗歌、散文、小说、戏剧等文学样式。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分"}}
{"id": "ca_DKSfFXti", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能对作品中感人的情境和形象说出自己的体验，品味作品中富于表现力的语言", "verb": "说出", "object": "自己的体验，品味作品中富于表现力的语言", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["审美创造", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能朗读文中感人的段落，并解释哪里让自己最受触动", "能找出文中运用比喻或拟人的句子，并说出这样写好在哪里"], "assessment": "您可以问问{{name}}，最近读的故事里哪个地方让他最感动，为什么作者那样写就特别打动他呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能对作品中感人的情境和形象说出自己的体验，品味作品中富于表现力的语言。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "体验表达与语言品味"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ccBRnFY4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "注重积累、感悟和运用，提高自己的欣赏品位", "verb": "运用", "object": "提高自己的欣赏品位", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能摘抄文中优美词句并写出自己的理解", "能用积累的词语写一段描写景物的话"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说最近摘抄的词句好在哪里吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 22, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "注重积累、感悟和运用，提高自己的欣赏品位。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "能力断言是课程目标（提高自己的欣赏品位），不是学生能力描述，无法对具体孩子判断会或不会"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_q9hNbyTA", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能利用图书馆、网络搜集自己需要的信息和资料，帮助阅读", "verb": "帮助", "object": "阅读", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据一个研究问题，从图书馆借阅相关书籍或从网上找到几篇相关文章。", "能将搜集到的资料，用自己的话归纳出与问题要点相关的几条信息。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能根据一个问题自己找到并整理出有用的资料吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 22, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "9. 能利用图书馆、网络搜集自己需要的信息和资料，帮助阅读。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该条出自课标第四学段（7-9年级）阅读目标中'能利用图书馆、网络搜集自己需要的信）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 22 页：第22页阅读与鉴赏第9条，属第21页「第四学段（7～9年级）」学段要求，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}]}
{"id": "ca_PLETaYnt", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能把握讨论的焦点，并能有针对性地发表意见", "verb": "讨论", "object": "焦点，并能有针对性地发表意见", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能复述讨论的核心问题并指出他人发言与焦点的关联", "能针对讨论主题提出具体观点并用事例支撑"], "assessment": "{{name}}在讨论中能抓住重点并说出自己的想法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "SPLIT", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 22, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能把握讨论的焦点，并能有针对性地发表意见。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "此能力贯穿整个义务教育阶段（G1–G9），标注学段无误，但学段跨度大，未作细分，对于G1低年级学生而言，‘有针对性地发表意见’的要求可能偏高，与具体学段目标匹配度不足。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "‘能复述讨论的核心问题并指出他人发言与焦点的关联’更多是倾听和理解能力，而非‘发表意见’这一思维能力的直接证据。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 23% < 62%），不采纳"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 23% < 62%），不采纳"}
{"id": "ca_TdvcnyDb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用联想和想象，丰富表达的内容", "verb": "运用", "object": "联想和想象，丰富表达的内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["审美创造", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能为诗句‘枯藤老树昏鸦’扩写出包含视觉、听觉等多感官细节的场景段落", "能根据一段简短的童话故事开头，续编出情节曲折、想象奇特的故事结局"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能为一段文字或一个开头，想出丰富又生动的新内容吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "运用联想和想象，丰富表达的内容。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用联想想象丰富表达", "verbFixedFrom": "表达/内容"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_cC85hV7t", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能从文章中提取主要信息，进行缩写", "verb": "提取", "object": "主要信息，进行缩写", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用不超过100字概括一篇800字文章的核心内容", "能准确列出文章的三个关键要素：人物、事件、结果"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇文章主要讲了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能从文章中提取主要信息，进行缩写；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "提取信息并缩写，属分析与交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ya2sWWET", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能变换文章的文体或表达方式等，进行改写", "verb": "表达", "object": "方式等，进行改写", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能将一段记叙文改写成结构清晰的说明文，并保留核心信息", "能用比喻、排比等修辞手法改写一段平淡的描写，使其更生动"], "assessment": "你可以让{{name}}试着把课文里的一段话换成另一种风格写出来吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能变换文章的文体或表达方式等，进行改写。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "改写需设计表达并交流信息"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_7gYnewEb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "尝试诗歌、小小说的写作", "verb": "尝试", "object": "诗歌、小小说的写作", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["审美创造", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成一首押韵的现代诗或一篇有情节的小小说", "能在作品中运用比喻、拟人等至少两种修辞手法"], "assessment": "{{name}}最近写过诗或小故事吗？能给我看看吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "尝试诗歌、小小说的写作。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "「尝试」一词含义模糊，无法判定学生是否达到该能力，更像是课程目标或教学建议"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "「尝试诗歌、小小说的写作」更接近课程内容要求或教学活动描述，而非对学生能力的具体断言"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "证据「能独立完成一首押韵的现代诗或一篇有情节的小小说」过于宽泛，缺乏对完成质量、篇幅、独立程度的具体界定，难以作为掌握证据"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_yTC9TFuG", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "作文每学年一般不少于14次，其他练笔不少于1万字,45分钟能完成不少于500字的习作", "verb": "完成", "object": "不少于500字的习作", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能定时完成一篇不少于500字的完整作文并提交", "能提供学年内至少14篇作文和一万字以上的练笔作品集"], "assessment": "{{name}}这学期写了多少篇作文？最近一篇定时写的作文大概有多少字？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "作文每学年一般不少于14次，其他练笔不少于1万字，45分钟能完成不少于500字的习作。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是课程标准对教学量的规定（每学年不少于14次、练笔不少于1万字），不是学生个体的能力描述。"}, {"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘45分钟能完成不少于500字的习作’是量化要求，但无法直接判断一个具体孩子‘会/不会’，它描述的是一个达标状态而非可观察的能力点。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "‘能提供学年内至少14篇作文和一万字以上的练笔作品集’是作品数量证明，无法证明学生是否具备‘45分钟完成500字’这一具体能力。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_ZDWEZbq6", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "学习跨媒介阅读与运用，体会不同媒介的表达特点，根据需要选用合适的媒介呈现探究结果", "verb": "表达", "object": "特点，根据需要选用合适的媒介呈现探究结果", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对比同一新闻事件的报纸文章与短视频，指出文字更详细、视频更直观", "能为班级读书报告选择用PPT展示图片和要点，而非纯文字稿"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说为什么做报告时选PPT而不是写篇文章吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "2. 学习跨媒介阅读与运用，体会不同媒介的表达特点，根据需要选用合适的媒介呈现探究结果。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "学习选用媒介呈现结果"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_jwME9Sm8", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "论分析问题，独立或合作写出简单的研究报告", "verb": "写出", "object": "简单的研究报告", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立或小组合作完成一份关于校园阅读习惯的调查报告，并提出改进建议。", "能根据收集的问卷数据，在报告中用图表和文字分析出两个主要结论。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你最近写的那份调查报告，最后得出了什么结论？是怎么分析出来的？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 24, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "论分析问题，独立或合作写出简单的研究报告。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘论分析问题，独立或合作写出简单的研究报告’是课程目标或教学建议，不是可直接判断学生‘会/不会’的具体能力点"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘论分析问题’表述模糊，更像教学要求而非学生能力描述；‘独立或合作写出简单的研究报告’是综合性任务，不是单一能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_vGDmySeA", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言文字积累与梳理", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "学习书写笔画简单的字，初步体会汉字结构的主要特点", "verb": "书写", "object": "笔画简单的字，初步体会汉字结构的主要特点", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能按正确笔顺写出“口”“山”等字，笔画位置基本准确", "能说出“林”字由两个“木”组成，左右结构大致对称"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我写“林”字时，左边和右边的“木”有什么不同吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 27, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "学习书写笔画简单的字，初步体会汉字结构的主要特点。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：句末谓语是虚动词「体会」：前面的「书写」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定", "by": "decidability-gate"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}
{"id": "ca_YrNB6pxN", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言文字积累与梳理", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "第四学段（7~9年级）(1) 在语言文字运用情境中，发现、感受和表现语言文字的魅力", "verb": "运用", "object": "情境中，发现、感受和表现语言文字的魅力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能朗读诗歌后说出觉得哪句特别美，并解释原因", "能在日记里用比喻等修辞手法描写校园一角"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能不能告诉我，你最喜欢课本里哪句话？为什么觉得它写得好呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 28, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "第四学段（7～9年级）(1) 在语言文字运用情境中，发现、感受和表现语言文字的魅力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "标注学段为G1–G2（小学低段），但能力断言明确写的是第四学段（7~9年级），学段标注错误。"}, {"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘在语言文字运用情境中，发现、感受和表现语言文字的魅力’是一句课程目标式的描述，无法直接判断一个具体学生‘会’或‘不会’。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标式的总要求，描述的是学生应达到的综合状态，而非一个可观察、可判定的具体行为能力。无法拆解为单一、明确的可观察动词与对象，以判定具体学生‘会’或‘不会’。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标式的总要求，描述的是学生应达到的综合状态，而非一个可观察、可判定的具体行为能力。无法拆解为单一、明确的可观察动词与对象，以判定具体学生‘会’或‘不"}
{"id": "ca_umwh88EP", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言文字积累与梳理", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "梳理学过的语言现象，欣赏优秀作品的语言表达技巧，初步探究语言文字的运用规律", "verb": "表达", "object": "技巧，初步探究语言文字的运用规律", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能找出课文中反复出现的词语，说出这样写读起来有什么感觉", "能仿照课文里喜欢的句子说一句自己的话，并说出为什么喜欢它"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说课文里哪些词用得特别好吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 28, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "(2) 梳理学过的语言现象，欣赏优秀作品的语言表达技巧，初步探究语言文字的运用规律。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标（教学建议），描述的是教师应引导学生进行的学习活动，而非学生能独立完成的具体能力行为。其表述（如‘梳理’。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「欣赏优秀作品的语言表达技巧」「初步探究语言文字的运用规律」是第三、四学段（5-）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据「能找出课文中反复出现的词语并说明其作用」只能证明词语识别与简单作用说明，无法证明「欣赏语言表达技巧」；「能比较两篇）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「梳理学过的语言现象」「欣赏优秀作品的语言表达技巧」「初步探究语言文字的运用规律）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标（教学建议），描述的是教师应引导学生进行的学习活动，而非学生能独立完成的具体能力行为。其表述（如‘梳理’、‘欣赏’、‘初步探究’）抽象，缺乏可观察、可判定的具体行为描述，无法直接转化为一个能对具体孩子答‘会/不会’的能力断言。"}}
{"id": "ca_x4V7PxiG", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文学阅读与创意表达", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用讲述、评析等方式，交流自己的情感体验", "verb": "交流", "object": "自己的情感体验", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能说出故事中自己最感动的情节并解释原因", "能用‘因为…所以…’评价书中人物行为对情感的影响"], "assessment": "您会看到{{name}}读完书后，能主动分享自己被打动的地方，并说清楚为什么。", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 34, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.98", "srcText": "运用讲述、评析等方式，交流自己的情感体验。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G1-G9跨度太大，低年级学生难以完成‘评析’和‘解释原因’等高阶思维任务，能力描述未体现学段差异"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议（运用…方式，交流…），描述的是教师教学行为或学习活动形式，而非学生的能力水平。它没有定义出学生在特定学段‘能’达成的、可观察的具体能力，因此无法直接改写为能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议（运用…方式，交流…），描述的是教师教学行为或学习活动形式，而非学生的能力水平。它没有定义出学生在特定学段‘能’达成的、可观察的具体能力，因此无法"}
{"id": "ca_JEJnDMSm", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文学阅读与创意表达", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "学习运用细节描写等文学表现手法", "verb": "运用", "object": "细节描写等文学表现手法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能在一段写人记事的习作中，用至少两处细节描写（如动作、神态、环境）呈现成长中的一件事", "能在写自己成长故事的片段里，运用一种文学表现手法（如比喻、拟人、细节描写）使叙述更具体"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用上比喻或细节描写来写一段话吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 34, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.98", "srcText": "学习运用细节描写等文学表现手法，描述自己成长中的故事。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只要求「用至少两处细节描写」或「运用一种文学表现手法（如比喻、拟人、细节描写）」，而断言的核心是「细节描写等文学表现手法」的运用能力；证据中把比喻、拟人、细节描写并列为可任选其一，实际只要写一个比喻句即可达标，证明不了「运用细节描写」这一能力", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「学习运用细节描写等文学表现手法」是第四学段（7-9年级）的写作要求，标成G1–）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 34 页：第34页文学阅读与创意表达「第三学段（5～6年级）」第(4)条（非第四学段），学段 G1-G9 → G5-G6"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据只覆盖了比喻、拟人两种修辞和动作、神态细节描写，无法证明「细节描写等文学表现手法」这一整体能力，且「月光像银色的）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_gF8DtXGT", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文学阅读与创意表达", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用多种方式交流自己的阅读感受", "verb": "交流", "object": "自己的阅读感受", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能就故事内容与同伴展开讨论，分享自己的看法", "能通过口头复述或绘画等方式表达对角色的感受"], "assessment": "你能用几种不同的方式，跟别人说说这本书带给你什么感觉吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 34, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.98", "srcText": "第四学段（7～9年级）（1）阅读反映中国革命各个时期的重大事件、伟大成就、代表性人物及其感人事迹的优秀文学作品，感悟革命领袖、革命英雄、模范人物的理想信念和奋斗精神，运用多种方式交流自己的阅读感受。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“运用多种方式交流自己的阅读感受”是课程目标描述，无法直接判断某个具体学生是否掌握"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标描述，且限定在第四学段（7-9年级）阅读特定类型文学作品的语境下，无法直接转化为对G1学段学生可判定的具体能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标描述，且限定在第四学段（7-9年级）阅读特定类型文学作品的语境下，无法直接转化为对G1学段学生可判定的具体能力断言。"}
{"id": "ca_ybVrqvEj", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "思辨性阅读与表达", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用口头和图文结合的方式，表达自己的观点和思考", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的观点和思考", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用口头讲述和画图结合的方式，说明自己对故事结局的看法", "能指着自己画的图，解释为什么觉得某个角色做得对或不对"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用说和画的方式，告诉我你对一件事的想法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 36, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "(1) 阅读有关科学的短文，尝试发现日月星辰、风雨雷电、山川草木等大自然的奥秘，依据事实和细节，运用口头和图文结合的方式，表达自己的观点和思考。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是阅读有关科学短文后的综合表达要求，涉及‘发现奥秘’、‘依据事实和细节’等前置条件，单独抽出‘表达观点和思考’作为。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言出自课标'思辨性阅读与表达'学习任务群，对应第三、四学段（5-9年级）的要）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 36 页：第36页思辨性阅读与表达「第二学段（3～4年级）」第(1)条，学段 G1-G9 → G3-G4"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是阅读有关科学短文后的综合表达要求，涉及‘发现奥秘’、‘依据事实和细节’等前置条件，单独抽出‘表达观点和思考’作为能力断言，信息不足以判定具体孩子是否会。"}}
{"id": "ca_ebZqYKB7", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "思辨性阅读与表达", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "合校园或社会生活中的实际事例，学习有理有据地口头或书面表达自己的观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能完成：合校园或社会生活中的实际事例，学习有理有据地口头或书面表达自己的观点"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 37, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "合校园或社会生活中的实际事例，学习有理有据地口头或书面表达自己的观点。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言本身是课程目标或教学建议的表述（‘学习有理有据地…’），而非一个可直接判断学生‘会/不会’的具体能力点。"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘学习有理有据地…表达自己的观点’是教学过程或目标描述，不是学生应掌握的具体能力。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据直接复述了断言本身，没有提供可观察、可测量的学生行为表现作为证据。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_qZjF6Yrb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "跨学科学习", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "意地设计并主动参与朗诵会、故事会、戏剧节等校园活动", "verb": "设计", "object": "并主动参与朗诵会、故事会、戏剧节等校园活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化自信", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能主动策划并组织一次班级故事会，包括选定主题、分配角色和安排流程", "能在戏剧节中担任导演或主演，协调排练并最终完成一场完整演出"], "assessment": "{{name}}最近有没有主动提议或参与组织过学校的朗诵、故事或戏剧活动？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "意地设计并主动参与朗诵会、故事会、戏剧节等校园活动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'意地设计并主动参与'是教学活动描述，不是可判断个体掌握程度的能力断言"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学活动描述，不是可判断个体掌握程度的能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学活动描述，不是可判断个体掌握程度的能力断言。"}
{"id": "ca_LQCcwFjR", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "跨学科学习", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用多种形式分享自己的经验与感受", "verb": "运用", "object": "多种形式分享自己的经验与感受", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能主动用图画、照片或实物向同伴介绍自己的一次旅行经历", "能在小组讨论中用角色扮演的方式演示自己解决冲突的过程"], "assessment": "{{name}}最近一次用图画或表演和别人分享了自己的什么事？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "第三学段（5～6年级）（1）积极参加校园文化社团，参与学校和社区举办的戏曲、书法、篆刻、绘画、刺绣、泥塑、民乐等相关文化活动，体验、感知、传承中华优秀传统文化，运用多种形式分享自己的经验与感受。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘运用多种形式分享自己的经验与感受’是课程目标或教学建议，无法直接判断一个具体学生是否会。掌握证据中的‘能主动用图画…’和‘能在小组讨论中…’是具体行为描述，但能力断言本身过于宽泛。"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "该断言更接近课程目标或教学活动描述，而非可直接观测和评估的学生能力。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_mcMv8ynW", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "跨学科学习", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用跨媒介形式分享研学成果", "verb": "运用", "object": "跨媒介形式分享研学成果", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能针对同一研学成果，分别用图文和口头讲解两种媒介呈现，并说明各自取舍", "能根据分享场合选择合适媒介，把同一内容改写成另一种媒介形式并说明理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}能用不同媒介形式把研学成果分享给别人吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "（2）综合运用语文、道德与法治、科学、劳动等多方面的知识和技能，通过小组研讨，集体策划、设计参观考察活动方案，运用跨媒介形式分享研学成果。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段G1–G9跨度过大，且掌握证据要求'用视频剪辑软件合成短片'，对小学低年）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 42 页：第42页跨学科学习「第三学段（5～6年级）」第(2)(3)条，学段 G1-G9 → G5-G6"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（'能制作包含图文和音频的研学报告并展示给同学'中的'展示给同学'无法判定具体孩子会/不会，缺乏可观察的完成标准；且'运用）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_5qjia2Ef", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "跨学科学习", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "设计人工智能时代的未来生活", "verb": "设计", "object": "人工智能时代的未来生活", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用图画或文字描绘一个AI辅助下的未来家庭一天生活场景", "能向同伴解释设计中的某个AI应用是如何解决具体问题的"], "assessment": "您看到{{name}}分享过关于未来AI生活的创意设计吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "（3）选取衣食住行、学校、地球、太空等某个方面，设计人工智能时代的未来生活，运用多样形式丰富自己的语言表达，呈现与分享奇思妙想。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“设计人工智能时代的未来生活”是项目主题或任务名称，不是可判断单个学生“会/不会”的具体能力点"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "“设计……未来生活”更接近课程目标或项目任务描述，而非学生应掌握的具体能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_wfwq5QCr", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "跨学科学习", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用多样形式丰富自己的语言表达，呈现与分享奇思妙想", "verb": "表达", "object": "呈现与分享奇思妙想", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能就衣食住行、学校、地球或太空某一方面，用口头讲述加图画或表演，向同学介绍自己设计的未来生活", "能在介绍未来生活时，用两种以上形式（如讲述、图画、表演）呈现同一奇思妙想，并说明各自表达效果"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}：最近有没有用特别的方式，把你的一个好点子讲给别人听？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.96", "srcText": "（3）选取衣食住行、学校、地球、太空等某个方面，设计人工智能时代的未来生活，运用多样形式丰富自己的语言表达，呈现与分享奇思妙想。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "「运用多样形式丰富自己的语言表达，呈现与分享奇思妙想」是课程目标/教学方向的表述，不是可对学生判定会/不会的能力点；真正可判定的是掌握证据里的具体行为（用口头讲述加图画或表演介绍未来生活），断言本身无法对一个具体孩子答会/不会。"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学活动描述，不是可判定的学生能力。原句未规定学生需要掌握的具体语言表达形式（如哪种绘画、手工）或可观察的分享行。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言出自课标“跨学科学习”学习任务群，其“呈现与分享奇思妙想”及“绘画、手工、）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 42 页：第42页跨学科学习「第三学段（5～6年级）」第(2)(3)条，学段 G1-G9 → G5-G6"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学活动描述，不是可判定的学生能力。原句未规定学生需要掌握的具体语言表达形式（如哪种绘画、手工）或可观察的分享行为标准，无法直接转化为对个体学生的‘会/不会’判断。"}}
{"id": "ca_dvuntXU5", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能正确书写 800 个左右常用汉字", "verb": "书写", "object": "800 个左右常用汉字", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能在一段百字左右的写话中，把想写的常用字都写对，不出现拼音代替", "能默写一段课本里学过的短文，其中常用汉字书写正确、无错别字"], "assessment": "您可以观察{{name}}的听写本和日常书写作业，看看他是否能准确写出大部分学过的常用字。", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "在学习与生活中，累计认识 1600 个左右常用汉字，能正确书写 800 个左右常用汉字。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（课标原文是'能正确书写800个左右常用汉字'，是小学阶段（G1-G6）的累计目标，不是G1-G2两年内就要达到的量。证据）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_RWWh3WGj", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能描述一幅图画的主要内容", "verb": "描述", "object": "一幅图画的主要内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着一幅画说出画里有什么人、在做什么事", "能按顺序讲出画中景物的前后左右位置"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这幅画里画了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "看图说话，能描述一幅图画的主要内容，说出多幅图画之间的内容关联。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述图画内容属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ZNwKmDYZ", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据提示提取文本的显性信息，通过关键词句说出事物的特点，作简单推测", "verb": "说出", "object": "事物的特点，作简单推测", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能从一段描写小猫的短文中，说出“小猫是白色的”“它的眼睛是蓝色的”这些直接提到的特点。", "能根据文中“小猫在温暖的窝里睡觉”这句话，推测出小猫可能觉得冷或者刚出生不久。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能从文章里直接找到描写小动物特点的句子吗？如果文章说它“在温暖的窝里睡觉”，你觉得它为什么会这样呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "喜欢阅读图画书、儿歌、童话、寓言等，在阅读过程中能根据提示提取文本的显性信息，通过关键词句说出事物的特点，作简单推测；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "提取信息、分析特点、作推测"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句本身是完整的学段要求，诊断指出的学段问题（G1要求偏高）是课标原文的设定，因此断言本身无需修改，只需确保其表述与课标原句一致。"}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_QAdPSgHt", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能借助关键词句复述自己读过的故事或其他内容，尝试对阅读内容提出问题", "verb": "复述", "object": "自己读过的故事或其他内容，尝试对阅读内容提出问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用自己的话讲出《小蝌蚪找妈妈》的主要情节，并提到蝌蚪变青蛙的过程", "能针对故事内容问出‘为什么小蝌蚪一开始认错了妈妈’这样的问题"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能讲讲刚才读的故事，并问一个你好奇的问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "能借助关键词句复述自己读过的故事或其他内容，尝试对阅读内容提出问题；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "复述与提问，属交流与提问实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ScEsYnJe", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "喜欢积累优美的词句，并尝试在口头和书面表达中运用", "verb": "表达", "object": "中运用", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能主动摘抄课文中优美的词语或句子到积累本上", "能说出自己摘抄的某个词语并尝试用在看图写话里"], "assessment": "{{name}}平时有没有主动把好词好句记下来，并试着用在说话或写话里呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "喜欢积累优美的词句，并尝试在口头和书面表达中运用。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学习兴趣和习惯，而非可直接观测的学生能力行为。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学习兴趣和习惯，而非可直接观测的学生能力行为"}}
{"id": "ca_zmzjJCMH", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用普通话朗读课文，注意发音", "verb": "朗读", "object": "课文", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用普通话朗读指定课文，无明显方言口音", "能清晰发出翘舌音、前后鼻音等易混淆音节"], "assessment": "请{{name}}朗读一段课文，听听他的发音是否标准清晰？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "朗读时能使用普通话，注意发音；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "朗读与发音属语言技能，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "朗读时能使用普通话，注意发音", "repair": {"why": "将‘朗读时能使用普通话，注意发音’调整为‘能用普通话朗读课文，注意发音’，明确了朗读对象为‘课文’，使能力可判定。", "grounding": 0.82}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 0.833, "verbatimCoverage": 0.846, "facts": ["朗读时能使用普通话", "朗读时注意发音"]}}
{"id": "ca_HtQjY9dD", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用自己喜欢的方式呈现学习所得", "verb": "呈现", "object": "学习所得", "type": "REPRESENTATIONAL", "literacy": ["审美创造", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用绘画或手工制作作品来展示课文主要内容", "能用口头讲述或表演形式向同学复述故事关键情节"], "assessment": "问问{{name}}最近一次用什么有趣的方式分享了学到的东西？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "在跨学科学习和探究活动中有好奇心和求知欲，喜欢观察、提问，能用自己喜欢的方式呈现学习所得。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“能用自己喜欢的方式呈现学习所得”是教学目标或活动建议，不是可判断学生“会/不会”的具体能力点"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "该断言描述的是教学活动形式（绘画、手工、口头讲述、表演），而非学生应掌握的语文能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_sfgXdLSr", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据具体语境辨析多音多义字的读音和字义，辨识、纠正常见的错别字", "verb": "纠正", "object": "常见的错别字", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能正确朗读并解释“重”在“重要”和“重新”中的不同读音和含义", "能找出并改正句子“他以经完成了”中的错别字"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我“重”字在不同词语里怎么读、什么意思吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "能根据具体语境辨析多音多义字的读音和字义，辨识、纠正常见的错别字。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课标对特定学段（中高年级）的总体能力要求，但未提供可直接用于低年级（G1）的、更基础的具体行为表述。诊断指出G1。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（多音多义字辨析和错别字辨识纠正属于第二学段（G3–G4）的识字写字要求，G1–G）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课标对特定学段（中高年级）的总体能力要求，但未提供可直接用于低年级（G1）的、更基础的具体行为表述。诊断指出G1学生识字量有限，主要任务是认读和书写基本汉字，而原句中的“辨析多音多义字”、“辨识、纠正常见的错别字”等要求超出G1学段的"}}
{"id": "ca_ipMLAWHN", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能使用硬笔规范、端正、", "verb": "使用", "object": "硬笔规范、端正、", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用硬笔在田字格中写出笔画顺序正确的汉字", "能保持字迹大小均匀、结构端正，无明显歪斜"], "assessment": "您可以观察{{name}}写字时，是否注意了笔顺和字的结构？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "能使用硬笔规范、端正、", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G1–G2学段要求‘能使用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写正楷字’，但断言中‘能使用硬笔规范、端正、’句子不完整，且‘能保持字迹大小均匀、结构端正，无明显歪斜’的要求更接近G3–G4学段的‘书写规范、端正、整洁’，与G1–G2的‘正楷’要求不完全匹配"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "课标原句‘能使用硬笔规范、端正、’本身不完整，缺少宾语和后续要求，无法构成一个可判定的学生能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：课标原句‘能使用硬笔规范、端正、’本身不完整，缺少宾语和后续要求，无法构成一个可判定的学生能力断言。"}
{"id": "ca_q3dARC9i", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能把具有相同或相似特征的汉字进行分类，并说明分类理由", "verb": "分类并说明", "object": "具有相同或相似特征的汉字和分类理由", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能将‘江、河、湖、海’归为一类，并说出‘它们都带有三点水，都和水有关’", "能将‘晴、阴、雨、雪’归为一类，并说出‘它们都是描述天气的词’"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把'跑、跳、踢'这些字放在一起吗？为什么觉得它们是一类呢？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "注意积累和梳理语言材料，能把具有相同或相似特征的汉字进行分类，愿意与他人交流分类的理由，感受汉字和汉语的魅力；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别汉字共性并归类", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能把具有相同或相似特征的汉字进行分类，愿意与他人交流分类的理由，感受汉字和汉语的魅力", "repair": {"why": "删除了无法判定的‘感受汉字和汉语的情感态度目标，保留了‘分类’和‘说明理由’两个可观察的行为动词，并将‘交流’具体化为‘说明’，使断言能对具体孩子判定。", "grounding": 0.87}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.864, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_pgzUaqSy", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能分类梳理日常生活中学到的词句，愿意用自己喜欢的方式整理学习成果，参加集体展示活动", "verb": "整理", "object": "学习成果，参加集体展示活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能将收集的词语按动物、植物等类别贴在自制分类卡片上", "能在班级分享会上展示自己的词语本并说出分类理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把学过的词语分好类，还愿意在班上给大家看看你是怎么整理的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能分类梳理日常生活中学到的词句，愿意用自己喜欢的方式整理学习成果，参加集体展示活动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'愿意用自己喜欢的方式整理学习成果'无法对具体孩子判断会/不会，属于情感态度描述"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的情感态度与行为表现（愿意、参加），而非可直接观察和判定的具体能力。其中‘愿意用自己喜欢的方式整理学习成果’是情感态度描述，无法对具体孩子判定‘会/不会’。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的情感态度与行为表现（愿意、参加），而非可直接观察和判定的具体能力。其中‘愿意用自己喜欢的方式整理学习成果’是情感态度描述，无"}
{"id": "ca_afU5P5S6", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能按照一定的顺序讲述见闻", "verb": "讲述", "object": "见闻", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能按时间顺序描述周末去公园的完整经历，从出发到回家", "能按空间顺序说出教室里从前到后摆放了哪些物品"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}：今天在幼儿园/学校都做了哪些事，能按顺序说给我听听吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能按照一定的顺序讲述见闻，说出自己的感受和想法；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "按顺序讲述见闻属于信息交流", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_NZrRZvAs", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能尝试根据语文学习经验和生活经验解决日常生活中的问题", "verb": "尝试", "object": "根据语文学习经验和生活经验解决日常生活中的问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用查字典的方法解决阅读中遇到的生字问题", "能根据购物小票计算总价并核对找零是否正确"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用学过的语文知识或生活经验来解决遇到的小问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能尝试根据语文学习经验和生活经验解决日常生活中的问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "第二条证据「能根据购物小票计算总价并核对找零是否正确」是数学能力，与「根据语文学习经验和生活经验解决日常生活中的问题」这条语文能力不匹配，证明不了该能力；第一条查字典证据尚可，但仅覆盖识字工具使用，不足以支撑整条断言。"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}]}
{"id": "ca_hyYPrfhQ", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用表现事物特征的词语描摹事物形象，并用积累的有新鲜感的词句描述想象的事物或画面", "verb": "用...描摹...并用...描述...", "object": "事物形象、想象的事物或画面", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用“金灿灿”“软绵绵”等词语描述一个想象中的水果", "能说出“云朵像棉花糖一样在天上散步”这样的句子"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用哪些好听的词来说说你想象中的小动物？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用表现事物特征的词语描摹形象，用积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句描述想象的事物或画面；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用语言建构与表达", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能用表现事物特征的词语描摹形象，用积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句描述想象的事物或画面", "repair": {"why": "将教学目标转化为学生可观察的能力行为，明确了“描摹”的对象为“事物形象”，并调整了句式，使其可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能用表现事物特征的词语描摹事物形象’是能力描述，但‘并用积累的有新鲜感的词句描述想象的事物或画面’更像是对前者的补充或目标，而非一个独立的、可单独判断‘会/不会’的能力点，其边界模糊。"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确将这两个行为并列，都是对学生的要求。断言的改写（将‘描摹形象’改为‘描摹事物形象’，省略了‘特别是’）是忠实的合并与简化，并未改变原意或引入模糊的能力边界。", "quote": "能用表现事物特征的词语描摹形象，用积累的语言材料，特别是有新鲜感的词句描述想象的事物或画面；", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_wn42zV7E", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能结合关键词句解释作品中人物的行为，从某个角度分析和评价人物", "verb": "解释", "object": "作品中人物的行为，从某个角度分析和评价人物", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能根据故事中人物说的一句话，说出他当时为什么这样做", "能选一个角度说喜欢或不喜欢这个人物，并举出故事里的一处表现"], "assessment": "你能和{{name}}聊聊故事里的人物吗？比如问问他，你觉得故事里的小主人公为什么这么做呀？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能结合关键词句解释作品中人物的行为，从某个角度分析和评价人物；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：课标原句（能结合关键词句解释作品中人物的行为，从某个角度分析和评价人物）本身是一个完整的、较高层级的能力要求，而非针对。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「结合关键词句解释人物行为、从某个角度分析和评价人物」属于第二学段（3-4年级））→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据二要求「说出故事里它骗小红帽开门的哪句话体现了这点」，这已是在文本中定位并引用具体语句支撑评价，超出G1–G2的阅读）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「结合关键词句解释人物行为、从某个角度分析和评价人物」属于第二学段（3-4年级））→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "课标原句（能结合关键词句解释作品中人物的行为，从某个角度分析和评价人物）本身是一个完整的、较高层级的能力要求，而非针对G1学段的具体能力点。诊断中明确指出该能力通常在G3及以上学段才要求，与抽坏的断言完全一致，只是学段错配。由于课标原句本身"}}
{"id": "ca_5VMPUPS4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能复述读过的故事，概括文本内容，根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流", "verb": "复述", "object": "读过的故事，概括文本内容，根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用三句话讲清《小蝌蚪找妈妈》的主要情节", "能向同伴提出一个关于故事结局的疑问并讨论"], "assessment": "你有没有听{{name}}复述过一个故事，或者问过你关于故事的问题？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能复述读过的故事，概括文本内容，根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，未明确区分学段，且‘根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流’在G1学段的具体能力要求不明确，无法直接转。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「概括文本内容」「根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流」超出G1–G2要求，课）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，未明确区分学段，且‘根据自己的阅读理解提出问题并与他人交流’在G1学段的具体能力要求不明确，无法直接转化为可判定的学生行为。"}}
{"id": "ca_fgyYhRpg", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "乐于参与读书交流活动", "verb": "交流", "object": "活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化自信"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能主动举手分享自己读过的一个故事片段", "能针对同伴的讲述提出一个相关问题并认真倾听回答"], "assessment": "我们可以问家长：{{name}}最近有没有在家或学校里主动讲过书里的故事？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "乐于参与读书交流活动，能诵读学过的优秀诗文，尝试用不同的语气、语调表达自己的理解与感受。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘乐于参与’是情感态度描述，无法对单个孩子判定‘会/不会’，更接近课程目标而非可测评的能力断言"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "原句是课标对学生活动参与的情感描述，掌握证据中‘主动举手’‘认真倾听’也属行为习惯，不是语文核心能力"}, {"type": "stage", "detail": "‘提出一个相关问题并认真倾听回答’涉及对他人话语的理解与追问能力，G1-G2段低年级学生难以稳定达成"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_FkHRkmq9", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能诵读学过的优秀诗文，并尝试用不同的语气、语调进行表达", "verb": "诵读", "object": "学过的优秀诗文", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用不同的语调朗读《咏鹅》", "能用不同的语气背诵《静夜思》"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用不同的声音读出古诗的感觉吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "乐于参与读书交流活动，能诵读学过的优秀诗文，尝试用不同的语气、语调表达自己的理解与感受。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "诵读与语调练习，非科学实践", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能诵读学过的优秀诗文，尝试用不同的语气、语调表达自己的理解与感受", "repair": {"why": "将‘尝试用不同的语气、语调表达自己的理解与感受’简化为‘尝试用不同的语气、语调进行表达’，符合该学段对‘尝试’的要求，并确保行为可观察。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.87, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_tMsBEGef", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能向他人讲述叙事性作品的主要内容", "verb": "讲述", "object": "叙事性作品的主要内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能看着绘本封面和插图，说出故事里发生了什么事", "能用自己的话，把故事的开头、经过和结果讲给同伴听"], "assessment": "你可以让{{name}}给你讲讲他刚看过的绘本，看看他能不能把故事的主要内容说清楚。", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "主动阅读成语故事、寓言故事、神话故事、革命英雄故事等叙事性作品，能向他人讲述主要内容；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "讲述主要内容属于信息交流", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能向他人讲述主要内容", "repair": {"why": "将泛指的'主要内容'具体化为课标原句中的'叙事性作品的主要内容'，使对象明确可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.938, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_CM9h586M", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用自己喜欢的形式记录阅读感受与生活体验", "verb": "记录", "object": "阅读感受与生活体验", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["审美创造", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能画出一幅画并配上简短文字描述书中最喜欢的角色", "能用三五句话写下周末在公园观察到的有趣小事"], "assessment": "请问{{name}}最近一次读完书后，是用什么方式把自己的感受画下来或写下来的？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用自己喜欢的形式记录阅读感受与生活体验。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G1-G2学段学生尚处于识字写字初期，‘能用三五句话写下周末在公园观察到的有趣小事’对一二年级学生而言，书面表达要求偏高，与学段实际能力不匹配"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：句末谓语是虚动词「感受」：前面的「记录」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：句末谓语是虚动词「感受」：前面的「记录」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定"}
{"id": "ca_JjPT569q", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能记录活动过程，表达自己的感受", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的感受", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用几句话写出活动做了什么和自己觉得开心或难过", "能画出活动场景并配上简单文字说明自己的心情"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我你参加活动后写了什么感受吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参加文学体验活动，能记录活动过程，表达自己的感受；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：句末谓语是虚动词「感受」：前面的「表达」只是状语里的动作，真正要求的仍不可判定", "by": "decidability-gate"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是活动目标，而非学生可观察的具体能力。‘记录活动过程’和‘表达自己的感受’在课标语境中是活动要求，不是可判定的学生能力表现。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是活动目标，而非学生可观察的具体能力。‘记录活动过程’和‘表达自己的感受’在课标语境中是活动要求，不是可判定的学生能力表现。"}
{"id": "ca_5UqVGynh", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能运用联想、想象续讲或续写童话、寓言故事", "verb": "续讲或续写", "object": "童话、寓言故事", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能根据《小蝌蚪找妈妈》的开头，续讲出小蝌蚪遇到小鱼的情节", "能为《龟兔赛跑》续写一个包含新角色（如小蚂蚁）的结尾"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能根据一个故事开头，自己编出后面的情节吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能按照童话、寓言等文体样式，运用联想、想象续讲或续写故事；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "续编故事属于建构解释与设计方案", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "运用联想、想象续讲或续写故事", "repair": {"why": "将原句中的‘童话、寓言等文体样式’具体化为‘童话、寓言故事’，并明确了‘续讲或续写’的对象，使其在G1学段（口头为主）可观察、可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_5F284FLs", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用日记等方式记录个人的见闻、感受和想法", "verb": "记录", "object": "个人的见闻、感受和想法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能写出包含时间、地点和事件经过的简短日记", "能用一两句话描述自己对某件事的感受或看法"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把今天发生的事情和你的心情写下来吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 46, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用日记等方式记录个人的见闻、感受和想法；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言本身是课标原文的教学目标表述，不是一条可直接观测的学生能力断言，无法判断某个孩子是否‘会’"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学目标表述，不是可直接观测的学生能力断言，无法判断某个孩子是否‘会’"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学目标表述，不是可直接观测的学生能力断言，无法判断某个孩子是否‘会’"}
{"id": "ca_4QuHmnJb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能参与简单的活动策划、组织工作", "verb": "参与", "object": "简单的活动策划、组织工作", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能就一次班级活动列出要做的三件事和先后顺序", "能说出自己负责哪一环节、和谁配合完成"], "assessment": "你能问问{{name}}，如果班级要办活动，ta会怎么帮忙计划吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参加跨学科学习活动，乐于观察、提问、交流，能参与简单的活动策划、组织工作；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议中的学生应达到状态，不是可直接观察判定的能力断言。课标原句‘能参与简单的活动策划、组织工作’未具体说明参。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（活动策划、组织工作属于综合性学习/口语交际中的统筹协调能力，课标中此类要求一般出）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据1「提出春游地点和活动建议并写在纸上」只体现提建议和书写，未体现「策划、组织」；证据2「按名单分配同学带零食、器材」）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「参与简单的活动策划、组织工作」属于口语交际/综合性学习中的组织协调能力，课标中）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议中的学生应达到状态，不是可直接观察判定的能力断言。课标原句‘能参与简单的活动策划、组织工作’未具体说明参与的具体行为标准，无法仅凭此句对孩子个体做出‘会/不会’的判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_wBxzhYwH", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能辨识同音字、形近字，并纠正书写中的错别字", "verb": "辨识、纠正", "object": "同音字、形近字、书写中的错别字", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能圈出‘已’和‘己’并解释区别", "能正确填写‘在’和‘再’的选词填空"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉妈妈「己」和「已」哪里不一样吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能辨识同音字、形近字，纠正错别字。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "辨识字形规律，分析字形差异", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能辨识同音字、形近字，纠正错别字", "repair": {"why": "原句本身是完整的能力描述，无需修改。诊断中的学段问题不影响断言本身的正确性，故保留原句并补充了更具体的对象‘书写中的’以增强可判定性。", "grounding": 0.85}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.706, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_mpRyDDzf", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用硬笔在田字格中规范、端正、整洁地书写本学期学写的常用汉字", "verb": "书写", "object": "本学期学写的常用汉字", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能用硬笔在田字格中写出笔画清晰、结构匀称的汉字", "能独立完成一页生字抄写，字迹大小一致、卷面干净"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把字写得像书上印的一样工整吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "书写技能，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字", "repair": {"why": "将累计目标‘2500个’改为‘本学期学写的’，使其符合G1学段的具体要求。", "grounding": 0.75}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 0.75, "verbatimCoverage": 0.667, "facts": ["能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字。"]}}
{"id": "ca_k5uXb2rL", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据字形推断字音字义，并借助语境和工具书验证自己的推断", "verb": "验证", "object": "自己的推断", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能根据“晴”字的“日”字旁推断其与太阳有关，并查字典验证读音和意思", "能通过上下文猜测生字“眺”的含义是远望，并在课文中找到“眺望”一词进行确认"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能先猜猜不认识的字怎么读、什么意思，再想办法去验证一下吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "有自觉识字的意识，在社会生活中发现自己不认识的字，能根据字形推断字音字义，并借助语境和工具书验证自己的推断；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学生在社会生活中识字的意识和方法，而非一个可直接观察和判定的具体能力行为。。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「根据字形推断字音字义，并借助语境和工具书验证推断」是课标第二学段（3-4年级））→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学生在社会生活中识字的意识和方法，而非一个可直接观察和判定的具体能力行为。"}}
{"id": "ca_fMUBhyHN", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息，初步判断内容或信息的合理性", "verb": "概括", "object": "说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息，初步判断内容或信息的合理性", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能读完一段介绍动物的短文后，用一两句话说出它主要讲了什么", "能看懂一张简单的课程表，并说出哪节课在星期几的第几节"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇短文主要讲了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息，初步判断内容或信息的合理性；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学目标，其指向的“说明性文字”和“非连续性文本”等文体概念，通常需要学生具备一定的抽象概括能力和文本分析经验，。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言要求概括说明性文字主要内容、提取非连续性文本关键信息并判断信息合理性，属于）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学目标，其指向的“说明性文字”和“非连续性文本”等文体概念，通常需要学生具备一定的抽象概括能力和文本分析经验，在G1学段（1-2年级）的课标中并未提出相应要求，因此该断言与学段不匹配，无法直接修改为针对G1学段的具体、可判定的能力断"}}
{"id": "ca_ptwpKpru", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序", "verb": "说明", "object": "事物或程序", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能按顺序说出制作纸飞机的三个步骤，每个步骤都用到‘首先’‘然后’‘最后’等连接词", "能指着图片说出图中动物的名称、颜色和正在做的动作，句子完整没有歧义"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用‘先…再…最后…’这样的词，说清楚你是怎么整理书包的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序，运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G1-G2学段学生能按顺序说出制作纸飞机的三个步骤，这属于口语表达的基础能力，但‘用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序’这一能力断言的表述更接近中高年级的说明文写作或复杂口语交际要求，与低年级‘说完整话’的典型表现不完全匹配，存在学段与内容难度轻微错位"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的能力目标，但未提供可观察、可判定的具体行为标准，无法直接转化为对单个学生的‘会/不会’判定。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的能力目标，但未提供可观察、可判定的具体行为标准，无法直接转化为对单个学生的‘会/不会’判定。"}
{"id": "ca_2PSeTyQj", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题", "verb": "运用", "object": "文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能读一段介绍某地过冬习俗的短文，说出文中提到的两种做法并据此说明自己可以怎么做", "能读一份活动通知，找出时间、地点、要带的东西，并据此说出自己该准备什么"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能从故事或图片里找到有用的信息来解决生活中的小问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序，运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议（‘能用…介绍…运用…’），不是可判定的学生能力断言。它描述的是教学应达成的综合效果，而非对单个学生‘会。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题」属于信息提取与运用的中高段要求，G1）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（「能根据故事中动物过冬的方式，说出自己冬天该穿什么衣服」中，动物过冬方式（冬眠、迁徙、储粮）与人类冬天穿衣之间没有文本信）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题」属于信息提取与运用的中高段要求，G1）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议（‘能用…介绍…运用…’），不是可判定的学生能力断言。它描述的是教学应达成的综合效果，而非对单个学生‘会/不会’的具体行为要求。"}}
{"id": "ca_gXUXxExK", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用多种媒介方式表达交流", "verb": "表达", "object": "交流", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能用图画和文字结合的方式讲述一个故事", "能用肢体动作和表情配合语言进行简单表演"], "assessment": "您可以问{{name}}：你能用画画和说话的方式给大家讲讲这个故事吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 47, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用多种媒介方式表达交流。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「能用多种媒介方式表达交流」是《义务教育语文课程标准》中「跨媒介阅读与交流」学习）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第一学段"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}}
{"id": "ca_yZQfkeWm", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能借助与文本相关的材料，结合作品关键语句评价文本中的主要事件和人物，提出自己的观点或看法", "verb": "评价", "object": "文本中的主要事件和人物，提出自己的观点或看法", "type": "META", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能对比课文与作者生平，分析‘孔乙己’悲剧的社会根源", "能引用‘范进中举’的关键细节，评价范进的个人选择与社会压力"], "assessment": "{{name}}能结合课外资料和课文关键句，说出你对‘孔乙己’或‘范进’的看法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能借助与文本相关的材料，结合作品关键语句评价文本中的主要事件和人物，提出自己的观点或看法；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "评价事件人物并提出观点", "stageFixedFrom": "G7-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["argumentation", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_kbzQXaJB", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能主动梳理、记录可供借鉴的语言运用实例", "verb": "记录", "object": "可供借鉴的语言运用实例", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能从所读材料中挑出可借鉴的语句，按用法分类记入笔记并注明可迁移之处", "能就同一表达功能收集两三个实例，比较异同后写明各自适用的写作场合"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你最近读书时有没有专门找一些写得特别好的句子记下来呀？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能主动梳理、记录可供借鉴的语言运用实例，比较其异同，积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G7-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "「主动梳理、记录」是学习习惯/行为要求，不是可判定的语文能力；且「可供借鉴的语言运用实例」表述笼统，无法对一个具体孩子答会/不会，真正可判定的是掌握证据里的「按用法分类记入笔记并注明可迁移之处」。", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是期望的学习过程，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力行为。例如‘比较其异同’和‘积极运用于…写作实践。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（断言要求的是「主动梳理、记录可供借鉴的语言运用实例」，核心在梳理（分类、归纳、提炼可迁移的用法）；而两条证据只到「圈画抄）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言要求「主动梳理、记录可供借鉴的语言运用实例」并「按用法分类记入笔记」「比较）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第三学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是期望的学习过程，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力行为。例如‘比较其异同’和‘积极运用于…写作实践中’均未提供具体、可判定的行为指标，无法据此判断单个学生是否‘会’。"}}
{"id": "ca_vnRXufEz", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "比较其异同，积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中", "verb": "比较", "object": "其异同，积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对比两篇写景散文的选材与手法，并口头分析其异同", "能将比较所得的写作技巧，在当堂短文练习中尝试运用"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说从比较中学到了什么，并试着用到自己的小练笔里吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能主动梳理、记录可供借鉴的语言运用实例，比较其异同，积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中”是教学建议或目标描述，无法判断具体学生是否掌握"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "“比较其异同，积极运用于不同类型的写作实践中”更接近教学目标或活动建议，而非可观测的学生能力描述"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "“能将比较所得的写作技巧，在当堂短文练习中尝试运用”中的“尝试运用”无法作为“掌握”的明确证据，程度模糊"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_KaD4C5mp", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能利用多种信息渠道获取资料，在简单的调查、访谈等活动中记录真实生活", "verb": "记录", "object": "真实生活", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据主题列出至少三种不同的资料来源（如书籍、网络、访谈）并说明各自用途", "能设计一份包含3-5个核心问题的访谈提纲，并在模拟访谈中记录对方的回答要点"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我，为了完成一个调查任务，你会从哪些不同的地方找资料，并且怎么把它们记下来吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "积极参加跨学科学习活动，能利用多种信息渠道获取资料，在简单的调查、访谈等活动中记录真实生活；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘能利用多种信息渠道获取资料’是教学目标而非可判定的学生能力，无法对具体学生回答‘会/不会’"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘在简单的调查、访谈等活动中记录真实生活’是教学活动描述，不是学生能力断言"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_789GWb8w", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据活动需要，结合自己的知识积累和生活经验提出要探究、解决的主要问题", "verb": "解决", "object": "主要问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能在小组讨论中主动提出一个与文本主题相关的、值得深入探究的问题", "能结合课文内容与生活实例，说明自己想探究某个问题的具体原因"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你在读完文章后，能自己提出想弄明白的问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能根据活动需要，结合自己的知识积累和生活经验提出要探究、解决的主要问题；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘能根据活动需要…提出要探究、解决的主要问题’表述为一种行为描述，而非可判定‘会/不会’的明确能力点，更像教学活动要求。"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "该断言更接近‘在…活动中应培养的能力方向’的教学建议或目标描述，而非学生具体可观察、可评估的语文能力。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_LUt8NvgD", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能借助跨学科知识和相关材料，与同学合作探索解决问题的具体方法", "verb": "探索", "object": "解决问题的具体方法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能与同学讨论并整合历史资料，解释《水浒传》中人物行为的时代背景", "能结合地理知识，分析《岳阳楼记》中景物描写与作者心境的关联"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能和同学一起用其他学科的知识来分析课文吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能借助跨学科知识和相关材料，与同学合作探索解决问题的具体方法，运用相关知识解释自己的想法，记录探究的过程及结论，写简单的研究报告；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘能借助跨学科知识和相关材料，与同学合作探索解决问题的具体方法’是一句教学建议或课程目标，无法直接判断某个具体学生‘会’或‘不会’"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "该断言描述的是教学活动或学习方式（合作探索），而非学生应具备的具体语文能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_TQv3e35K", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用相关知识解释自己的想法，记录探究的过程及结论，写简单的研究报告", "verb": "记录", "object": "探究的过程及结论，写简单的研究报告", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能围绕一个主题查阅资料，并用表格或清单整理出关键信息点", "能在报告中清晰写出自己提出的问题、调查方法和最终结论"], "assessment": "我们可以问问{{name}}，最近有没有针对一个话题做小调查并写下发现？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 48, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能借助跨学科知识和相关材料，与同学合作探索解决问题的具体方法，运用相关知识解释自己的想法，记录探究的过程及结论，写简单的研究报告；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是教学活动或任务描述（写研究报告），不是可直接判断学生会不会的能力条目"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_ZdCHzjcQ", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能规范、端正、整洁地书写常用汉字", "verb": "书写", "object": "常用汉字", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能现场抄写一段约100字的课文片段，做到笔画规范、结构端正、卷面整洁无涂改", "能在规定时间内完成一页常用汉字的书写练习，做到字迹端正、行款整齐、无错别字"], "assessment": "您看{{name}}最近写的作业或试卷，字是不是都写得方方正正，很干净呢？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "在学习与生活中，累计认识 3500 个左右常用汉字，能规范、端正、整洁地书写常用汉字；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "领域标为「阅读与鉴赏」有误，这条属于「识字与写字」领域，与阅读鉴赏无关。"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是总目标，未限定学段，且‘规范、端正、整洁’是书写质量要求，非具体可观察行为，无法直接转化为对G7学生的具体能力判。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「规范、端正、整洁地书写常用汉字」是识字与写字领域第一学段（1-2年级）就提出的）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第四学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「规范、端正、整洁地书写常用汉字」是小学1-2年级（第一学段）的识字写字目标，课）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第四学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是总目标，未限定学段，且‘规范、端正、整洁’是书写质量要求，非具体可观察行为，无法直接转化为对G7学生的具体能力判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_hqaAnBWy", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯，选择并使用不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "verb": "选择并使用", "object": "不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能从积累的词句库中，为描写人物兴奋的心情挑选并使用一个特定的比喻句。", "在写一篇说明文时，能为了使语言更生动，选择并使用之前积累的一个拟人化词语。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说上次写作文时，你是怎么决定用哪种风格来写的吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "发现并积累不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落，能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "根据表达需要选择词句，属于建构表达与交流信息"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用", "repair": {"why": "补全了宾语“不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落”，使能力对象明确可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_mnKVG93w", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能区分事实与观点", "verb": "区分", "object": "事实与观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能从一篇新闻报道中准确标出作者给出的纯客观事实句，以及表达个人看法的句子。", "能在一篇议论文中，明确指出哪句话是作者的观点，并说明其论据是事实还是推论。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我刚才读的那段话里，哪句是事实，哪句是作者的看法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "阅读新闻报道、说明性文字以及非连续性文本，能区分事实与观点；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "区分事实与观点是论证的基础"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["argumentation"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_6kLb5kYy", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能利用掌握的多种证据判断信息的真实性与可信度", "verb": "判断", "object": "信息的真实性与可信度", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对比文章中引用的数据与权威来源是否一致", "能指出作者观点与文中事实证据之间的矛盾之处"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说这篇文章里哪些信息让你觉得可信，哪些让你怀疑吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能利用掌握的多种证据判断信息的真实性与可信度，能运用文本信息解决具体问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_eqGZSd3m", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能运用文本信息解决具体问题", "verb": "运用", "object": "文本信息解决具体问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据文章描述在地图上标出主人公的行进路线", "能从实验报告中提取关键数据来回答一个具体问题"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能根据文章内容解决实际问题吗？比如根据说明书画一个示意图。", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能利用掌握的多种证据判断信息的真实性与可信度，能运用文本信息解决具体问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析文本信息并据此解决问题"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_mNUbTAWd", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能区分观点与材料，并能解释观点与材料之间的联系", "verb": "区分", "object": "观点与材料，并能解释观点与材料之间的联系", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能圈出文章中的事实陈述与作者的主观判断，并说明哪句是观点、哪句是材料", "能解释作者用某个例子是为了证明哪个具体观点，并说明两者如何对应"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇文章里哪句话是作者的看法，哪句话是用来支持它的事实吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "SPLIT", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "阅读简单议论性文章，能区分观点与材料，并能解释观点与材料之间的联系；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "辨析因果联系并基于证据论证"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["cause-effect"], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "argumentation"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_uCS9zxVB", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用多种媒介形式交流沟通", "verb": "交流", "object": "沟通", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能制作包含图文和音频的演示文稿来分享读书心得", "能通过短视频和旁白清晰地介绍一个科学实验的步骤"], "assessment": "你可以观察一下，{{name}}在做小组汇报或介绍东西时，会不会用到图片、录音或者小视频来帮忙说明？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用多种媒介形式交流沟通；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘能用多种媒介形式交流沟通’是跨媒介阅读与交流学习任务群的总体要求，而非学生具体的能力表现。证据中‘能制作演示文稿’‘能通过短视频介绍’是更具体的能力表现，但断言本身更像是任务群名称或教学目标。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据‘能制作包含图文和音频的演示文稿来分享读书心得’与‘能通过短视频和旁白清晰地介绍一个科学实验的步骤’分别对应‘读书心得分享’和‘科学实验介绍’，但断言‘能用多种媒介形式交流沟通’过于宽泛，这两个具体证据无法充分证明学生具备该断言所指向的普遍性跨媒介沟通能力。"}, {"type": "stage", "detail": "证据中‘介绍一个科学实验的步骤’属于跨学科内容，其能力要求与语文核心能力关联度较弱，且在语文能力图谱中出现，可能混淆了学科边界。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_tBrj6hLx", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能使用常用的标点符号，准确地表情达意", "verb": "标点", "object": "符号，准确地表情达意", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能给同一句话加上不同标点，并说出各自表达的语气差别", "能根据一段话的情感基调，为其中两处选择标点并说明理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你写完这段话，能自己把标点检查一遍吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能使用常用的标点符号，准确地表情达意；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "「准确地表情达意」是课程目标的表述，不是可判定的学生行为；本条真正可测的只有「使用常用标点符号」这一半，后半句属于目标性描述，混入能力断言会让人无法对一个具体孩子答会/不会。"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学目标，不是可观察的学生能力断言，无法判定具体学生是否掌握。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「能使用常用的标点符号，准确地表情达意」是小学阶段（1-6年级，尤其第二、三学段）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第四学段"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「能使用常用的标点符号，准确地表情达意」是《义务教育语文课程标准》第一学段（1–）→ 撤销：课标正文标了第四学段，模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学目标，不是可观察的学生能力断言，无法判定具体学生是否掌握"}}
{"id": "ca_jYy6Uz8X", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "verb": "呈现", "object": "活动设计方案", "type": "REPRESENTATIONAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能为班级读书会画出包含时间、地点、流程和分工的示意图", "能写一段文字说明读书会活动的具体步骤和每个环节的目标"], "assessment": "你可以让{{name}}画一个生日派对计划或者学习小组活动的流程图，看看他/她是否能想得清楚、写得明白。", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "用流程图呈现方案，建模与设计"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["systems"], "practice": ["modeling", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_5vWXdeJP", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句", "verb": "整理", "object": "富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能将课文中的比喻句、拟人句分别归类到不同笔记本页面", "能按主题（如思乡、爱国）整理并摘抄多首古诗中的名句"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把课本里那些写得特别生动的句子和诗，分门别类地整理到自己的本子上吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句，分析作品表现手法的作用；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类整理即找规律与分析数据", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句是课标对整个义务教育阶段的能力要求，诊断指出其跨度过大。为使其可判定，根据学段要求将其限定为中高年级（G5），表述完全来自原句，并确保对象和行为明确、可观察。"}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：G1–G9跨度太大，低年级（如G1-G2）学生尚不具备独立分类整理复杂修辞和主题的能力，此能力更符合中高年级（如G5-G9）要求"}], "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生具备此能力，断言是忠实转述。意见中关于年级适用性的讨论属于教学实施层面的判断，不影响能力要求本身的成立。", "quote": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_FP8BngRb", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能从作品中找出值得借鉴的地方，对照他人的语言表达反思自己的语言实践", "verb": "表达", "object": "反思自己的语言实践", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对照范文中的一处表达，说出自己作文里对应位置写得不同并说明差异", "能针对自己作文的一处表达，参照范文的写法当场改出一句并说明改动理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说从别人的文章里学到了什么，用来改进自己的写作吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能从作品中找出值得借鉴的地方，对照他人的语言表达反思自己的语言实践；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学习过程，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力。‘值得借鉴’、‘反思’等表述主观性强，无法转化为对具。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言要求「对照他人的语言表达反思自己的语言实践」，属于课标第四学段（7-9年级）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 50 页：第50页学业质量描述，属第49页「第四学段（7～9年级）」（第51页起为课程实施），学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据「圈出范文中3处以上的好词好句」只能证明识别与摘抄能力，无法证明「反思自己的语言实践」这一核心要求；第二条证据虽涉及）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学习过程，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力。‘值得借鉴’、‘反思’等表述主观性强，无法转化为对具体学生‘会/不会’的判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_sQszGrR4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能概括文学作品中的典型形象特征和典型事件，并归纳总结出一些文化现象", "verb": "概括", "object": "文学作品中的典型形象特征和典型事件，并归纳总结出一些文化现象", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "文化自信"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能由《骆驼祥子》中祥子的遭遇，说出当时社会的一个普遍现象", "能由《朝花夕拾》片段，归纳出旧式教育中的一种文化现象"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说你从故事人物或事件里，发现了哪些过去人们的共同做法或观念吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能概括文学作品中的典型形象特征和典型事件，并归纳总结出一些文化现象，了解基本的中国古代文化常识；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "证据只覆盖了'归纳文化现象'这一半，未证明'概括典型形象特征和典型事件'——两条证据都是'由作品归纳现象'，没有一条要求说出祥子或某个人物的形象特征、也没有要求概括具体事件，前半条能力无证据支撑", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教师教学建议（'能概括...了解...'），描述的是教学目标而非学生可观察的能力行为，且'一些文化现象'指代不明。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（《骆驼祥子》《朝花夕拾》是七至九年级（初中）的整本书阅读书目，掌握证据全部落在初）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 50 页：第50页学业质量描述，属第49页「第四学段（7～9年级）」（第51页起为课程实施），学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（断言要求'归纳总结出一些文化现象'，但两条证据只到'概括形象特征与典型事件'（祥子经历性格、旧式教育特点），没有任何一条）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教师教学建议（'能概括...了解...'），描述的是教学目标而非学生可观察的能力行为，且'一些文化现象'指代不明。"}}
{"id": "ca_ipAFj2JC", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能运用实证性材料对相关问题作出合理的解释与推断", "verb": "解释", "object": "与推断", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力", "语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能针对给定材料中的问题，用材料里的事实或数据说明自己的解释理由", "能依据材料中的实证信息，对问题作出推断并说明推断所依据的内容"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用文章里的证据来解释问题或推断结论吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能运用实证性材料对相关问题作出合理的解释与推断；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，未限定具体学段和可观察的学生行为，且‘推断作者未直接说明的结论’在G1阶段无法判定。。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「运用实证性材料对相关问题作出合理解释与推断」属于思辨性阅读与表达，是第四学段（）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 50 页：第50页学业质量描述，属第49页「第四学段（7～9年级）」（第51页起为课程实施），学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据只覆盖了「推断」这一半（找数据支撑观点、推断未直接说明的结论），没有覆盖「解释」这一半，无法证明学生能对相关问题）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，未限定具体学段和可观察的学生行为，且‘推断作者未直接说明的结论’在G1阶段无法判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_zWTWJPum", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过梳理、分析材料提炼出自己的看法", "verb": "分析", "object": "材料提炼出自己的看法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能给一段材料，先列出其中几条要点，再据此说出自己的一个看法", "能对同一话题的两段材料，指出它们的分歧并说明自己更认同哪一方"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能从材料里找出支持你观点的证据吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能通过梳理、分析材料提炼出自己的看法；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句‘能通过梳理、分析材料提炼出自己的看法’是高度概括的能力维度描述，而非可具体判定的学生行为表现。课标原文未提供足够。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「梳理、分析材料提炼自己的看法」属于思辨性阅读与表达，课标在第三、四学段（5-9）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 50 页：第50页学业质量描述，属第49页「第四学段（7～9年级）」（第51页起为课程实施），学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据「能用自己的话说出两篇课文主要观点的相同与不同」只证明能比较两篇课文的观点，未涉及「梳理、分析材料」并「提炼自己的看）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句‘能通过梳理、分析材料提炼出自己的看法’是高度概括的能力维度描述，而非可具体判定的学生行为表现。课标原文未提供足够细节（如针对何种材料、提炼出何种程度的‘看法’）来构成一个能对具体孩子判定‘会/不会’的断言。"}}
{"id": "ca_KGVJt4rT", "discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能综合运用绘画、表演、创作等多种活动样式开展校园活动和社会活动", "verb": "运用", "object": "绘画、表演、创作等多种活动样式开展校园活动和社会活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化自信", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用绘画或表演等形式，向同学介绍一个校园节日活动方案", "能和小组成员一起，用肢体动作或图画来呈现一个社区环保故事"], "assessment": "咱们家孩子在活动中，能自己想出用画、演这些办法来把事情说清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "通过合作，能综合运用绘画、表演、创作等多种活动样式开展校园活动和社会活动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "这是对教学活动的描述，不是学生能回答‘会/不会’的具体能力，如‘能用绘画介绍方案’中的‘介绍’无法客观判断掌握程度"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘能综合运用绘画、表演、创作等多种活动样式开展校园活动和社会活动’更像课程目标或教学建议，而非可直接观测的学生能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_1fyve57q", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出累计认识常用汉字2500个左右，其中1600个左右会写", "verb": "说出", "object": "累计认识常用汉字2500个左右，其中1600个左右会写", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：累计认识常用汉字2500个左右，其中1600个左右会写是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出累计认识常用汉字2500个左右，其中1600个左右会写吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "累计认识常用汉字2500个左右，其中1600个左右会写", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识字量目标，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_M3AUytZu", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "审美鉴赏与创造", "statement": "能用毛笔临摹正楷字帖", "verb": "临摹", "object": "正楷字帖", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["审美鉴赏与创造"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["学生用毛笔在纸上临摹字帖中的正楷字", "学生完成临摹后，作品中的字形结构与字帖基本一致"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出毛笔临摹的对象是正楷字帖吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "用毛笔临摹正楷字帖", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "临摹字帖属技能训练，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 16, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.9, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出毛笔临摹的对象是正楷字帖", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文『用毛笔临摹正楷字帖』是明确的行为要求，动词是『临摹』，对象是『正楷字帖』，属于程序性技能。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}}
{"id": "ca_7yXhLQAS", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出略读的目的是粗知文章大意", "verb": "说出", "object": "略读的目的是粗知文章大意", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：略读的目的是粗知文章大意是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出略读的目的是粗知文章大意吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "学习略读，粗知文章大意", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定阅读目的，属提问与界定问题"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions"], "dropReason": "改写凭空造出「X的作用/目的是Y」这类关系，原文没有这个判断。接地校验查不出来 —— 编的是关系不是词，字面覆盖率照样很高。"}
{"id": "ca_M7d6v5kv", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出理解生词意义的途径是借助字典、词典和生活积累", "verb": "说出", "object": "理解生词意义的途径是借助字典、词典和生活积累", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：理解生词意义的途径是借助字典、词典和生活积累是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出理解生词意义的途径是借助字典、词典和生活积累吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能借助字典、词典和生活积累，理解生词的意义", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "学生需说明理解词义的方法", "srcPage": 16, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.762, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_9mV62ahn", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "审美鉴赏与创造", "statement": "能说出硬笔书写楷书的要求是行款整齐、力求美观、有一定的速度", "verb": "说出", "object": "硬笔书写楷书的要求是行款整齐、力求美观、有一定的速度", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["审美鉴赏与创造"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：硬笔书写楷书的要求是行款整齐、力求美观、有一定的速度是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出硬笔书写楷书的要求是行款整齐、力求美观、有一定的速度吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "硬笔书写楷书，行款整齐，力求美观，有一定的速度", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识字书写类，无跨学科概念与科学实践", "srcPage": 18, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.792, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_bBcJaDtM", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出默读一般读物每分钟不少于300字", "verb": "说出", "object": "默读一般读物每分钟不少于300字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：默读一般读物每分钟不少于300字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出默读一般读物每分钟不少于300字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "默读一般读物每分钟不少于300字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "默读速度是技能熟练度，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_vqZdYc08", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出课外阅读总量不少于100万字", "verb": "说出", "object": "课外阅读总量不少于100万字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：课外阅读总量不少于100万字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出课外阅读总量不少于100万字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "课外阅读总量不少于100万字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "阅读量要求，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_DVwM6S6T", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "verb": "说出", "object": "背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "背诵记忆，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_6n6vZNVt", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "verb": "背诵", "object": "能背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：能背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出能背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "背诵优秀诗文60篇（段）", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "背诵记忆，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_IS3st2Zw", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出写作的目的是自我表达和与人交流", "verb": "说出", "object": "写作的目的是自我表达和与人交流", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：写作的目的是自我表达和与人交流是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出写作的目的是自我表达和与人交流吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "懂得写作是为了自我表达和与人交流。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记性知识，无跨学科思维或实践动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "改写凭空造出「X的作用/目的是Y」这类关系，原文没有这个判断。接地校验查不出来 —— 编的是关系不是词，字面覆盖率照样很高。"}
{"id": "ca_sTsIxpdv", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "verb": "说出", "object": "记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能写简单的记实作文和想象作文，内容具体，感情真实。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类要求，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 20, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 0.867, "verbatimCoverage": 0.762, "facts": ["能写简单的记实作文", "能写简单的想象作文", "记实作文内容具体", "想象作文内容具体", "记实作文感情真实"]}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_ypctvSOd", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出课外阅读总量不少于260万字", "verb": "说出", "object": "课外阅读总量不少于260万字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：课外阅读总量不少于260万字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出课外阅读总量不少于260万字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "课外阅读总量不少于260万字。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "阅读量要求，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_nTmLIjpz", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出每学年阅读名著的数量要求是两三部", "verb": "说出", "object": "每学年阅读名著的数量要求是两三部", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：每学年阅读名著的数量要求是两三部是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出每学年阅读名著的数量要求是两三部吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "每学年阅读两三部名著", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "记忆性要求，无思维或实践动作", "srcPage": 22, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.526, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_g8uDKxm7", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品应占60%~70%", "verb": "说出", "object": "体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品应占60%~70%", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品应占60%~70%是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品应占60%~70%吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品，应占60%～70%", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "内容比例要求，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 26, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.885, "facts": ["体现中华优秀传统文化、革命文化、社会主义先进文化的作品应占60%～70%"]}}
{"id": "ca_JqcRZU67", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出反映世界文明优秀成果、科技进步、日常生活特别是儿童生活等方面的作品是社会主义先进文化的内容主题之一", "verb": "说出", "object": "反映世界文明优秀成果、科技进步、日常生活特别是儿童生活等方面的作品是社会主义先进文化的内容主题之一", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：反映世界文明优秀成果、科技进步、日常生活特别是儿童生活等方面的作品是社会主义先进文化的内容主题之一是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出反映世界文明优秀成果、科技进步、日常生活特别是儿童生活等方面的作品是社会主义先进文化的内容主题之一吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在突出上述主题的同时，还应选择反映世界文明优秀成果、科技进步、日常生活特别是儿童生活等方面的主题。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记性内容，无跨学科思维或实践动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_CGwvpgE3", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能进行口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动", "verb": "交流与沟通 / 表达", "object": "口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生能就一个主题进行口头或书面的讨论与回应", "学生能使用不同媒介（如文字、图片、视频）来呈现和说明自己的观点"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动是各类主题的主要载体之一吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "各类主题的主要载体还应包括口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "核心是获取、评估与交流信息", "srcPage": 26, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 1.0, "facts": ["各类主题的主要载体还应包括口头和书面交流与沟通。", "各类主题的主要载体还应包括跨媒介阅读与表达。", "各类主题的主要载体还应包括语文实践活动。"], "passed": true}, "statementBefore": "能说出口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动是各类主题的主要载体之一", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将「说出…是载体」的陈述句，改为「能进行…实践」的能力句，使用了原文动词「交流与沟通」和「表达」，并明确了实践对象。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["表达", "交流"]}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "能力断言'能进行口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动'是课标中对整个学段目标的概括性描述，而非可具体观测、判断单个学生'会不会'的单一能力点。它更像是一个课程目标或教学领域名称，不是一条可评估的能力断言。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文是'各类主题的主要载体还应包括口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动'，这句话的主语是'载体'，描述的是教材或课程应包含的活动类型，而非直接对学生提出的能力要求。能力断言'能进行口头和书面交流与沟通、跨媒介阅读与表达等语文实践活动'是对课程内容的转述，而非一个可具体观测、判断单个学生'会不会'的单一能力点，更像一个课程目标或教学领域名称（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"id": "ca_e3hj0G3O", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能按照词类梳理字词，并整理典型的语法、修辞应用实例", "verb": "应用", "object": "语法、修辞应用实例", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生从课文中找出比喻、拟人等修辞手法并归类整理", "学生将常见语法错误进行分类，并标注正确用法"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出语法、修辞应用实例是需要整理的典型语言现象吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "学习按照词类梳理字词，学习整理典型的语法、修辞应用实例。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语言规律并分类整理实例", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.905, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出语法、修辞应用实例是需要整理的典型语言现象", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中只要求学生‘说出’的现象，修复为课标原文要求的‘梳理’和‘整理’的具体动作，并明确指向‘应用实例’这一对象。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["应用"]}}
{"id": "ca_KIIdkRR3", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出应先认先写《识字、写字教学基本字表》中的字", "verb": "说出", "object": "应先认先写《识字、写字教学基本字表》中的字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["问：应先认先写《识字、写字教学基本字表》中的字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出应先认先写《识字、写字教学基本字表》中的字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "应先认先写《识字、写字教学基本字表》中的字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识字记忆，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_Ehwr5KJ5", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "整本书阅读", "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出《小英雄雨来》《雷锋的故事》等图书表现了英雄模范事迹", "verb": "说出", "object": "《小英雄雨来》《雷锋的故事》等图书表现了英雄模范事迹", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：《小英雄雨来》《雷锋的故事》等图书表现了英雄模范事迹是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《小英雄雨来》《雷锋的故事》等图书表现了英雄模范事迹吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "阅读表现英雄模范事迹的图书，如《小英雄雨来》《雷锋的故事》等，讲述英雄模范的动人故事。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类内容，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.818, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_jutkAKe4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "整本书阅读", "dimension": "审美鉴赏与创造", "statement": "能说出《稻草人》《爱的教育》等作品传达了真善美", "verb": "说出", "object": "《稻草人》《爱的教育》等作品传达了真善美", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["审美鉴赏与创造"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：《稻草人》《爱的教育》等作品传达了真善美是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《稻草人》《爱的教育》等作品传达了真善美吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "阅读儿童文学名著，如《稻草人》《爱的教育》等，感受作品传达的真善美，用自己喜欢的方式讲述故事大意。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "文学鉴赏，非科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.789, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_152UB3Gh", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "整本书阅读", "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出《可爱的中国》《小兵张嘎》《闪闪的红星》等作品反映了革命传统", "verb": "说出", "object": "《可爱的中国》《小兵张嘎》《闪闪的红星》等作品反映了革命传统", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：《可爱的中国》《小兵张嘎》《闪闪的红星》等作品反映了革命传统是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《可爱的中国》《小兵张嘎》《闪闪的红星》等作品反映了革命传统吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "阅读反映革命传统的作品，如《可爱的中国》《小兵张嘎》《闪闪的红星》等，讲述自己感受到的家国情怀和爱国精神。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类内容，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.84, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_Xq8Tze9r", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出《寄小读者》《十万个为什么》《海底两万里》等作品属于文学、科普、科幻等方面的优秀作品", "verb": "说出", "object": "《寄小读者》《十万个为什么》《海底两万里》等作品属于文学、科普、科幻等方面的优秀作品", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：《寄小读者》《十万个为什么》《海底两万里》等作品属于文学、科普、科幻等方面的优秀作品是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《寄小读者》《十万个为什么》《海底两万里》等作品属于文学、科普、科幻等方面的优秀作品吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "阅读文学、科普、科幻等方面的优秀作品，如《寄小读者》《十万个为什么》《海底两万里》等，学习梳理作品的基本内容，针对作品中感兴趣的话题展开交流。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "文学体裁分类，非科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "独立验证不通过 —— 没有标准答案：原文是「讨论/探讨」类活动，不是可判定的事实", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}}
{"id": "ca_0PmQ3XrM", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品", "verb": "说出", "object": "《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "阅读革命文学作品，如《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》等", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "文学体裁归类，非跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.81, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_pV6oK7k2", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出《朝花夕拾》《骆驼祥子》《艾青诗选》《西游记》《格列佛游记》《钢铁是怎样炼成的》是文学名著", "verb": "说出", "object": "《朝花夕拾》《骆驼祥子》《艾青诗选》《西游记》《格列佛游记》《钢铁是怎样炼成的》是文学名著", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：《朝花夕拾》《骆驼祥子》《艾青诗选》《西游记》《格列佛游记》《钢铁是怎样炼成的》是文学名著是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《朝花夕拾》《骆驼祥子》《艾青诗选》《西游记》《格列佛游记》《钢铁是怎样炼成的》是文学名著吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "独立阅读古今中外诗歌集、中长篇小说、散文集等文学名著，如《朝花夕拾》《骆驼祥子》《艾青诗选》《西游记》《格列佛游记》《钢铁是怎样炼成的》等", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.939, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ohdfFfiE", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "审美鉴赏与创造", "statement": "能说出结合自己的阅读体会尝试撰写文学鉴赏文章是读书活动的一种形式", "verb": "说出", "object": "结合自己的阅读体会尝试撰写文学鉴赏文章是读书活动的一种形式", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["审美鉴赏与创造"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：结合自己的阅读体会尝试撰写文学鉴赏文章是读书活动的一种形式是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出结合自己的阅读体会尝试撰写文学鉴赏文章是读书活动的一种形式吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "结合自己的阅读体会，尝试撰写文学鉴赏文章", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "撰写鉴赏文章是建构解释与交流", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.621, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_irEeQk5z", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "跨学科学习", "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "statement": "能说出龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象", "verb": "说出", "object": "龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "探寻日常生活中龙凤、松竹梅兰等中华文化意象", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "文化意象识记，非思维或实践训练", "srcPage": 42, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G5-G6", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.75, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_8xVO5dmi", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出心理健康、身体素质是师生共同关心的问题领域", "verb": "说出", "object": "心理健康、身体素质是师生共同关心的问题领域", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：心理健康、身体素质是师生共同关心的问题领域是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出心理健康、身体素质是师生共同关心的问题领域吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在心理健康、身体素质等方面，选择师生共同关心的问题", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记性内容，无跨学科思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_9BoApD52", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出在心理健康、身体素质等方面选择师生共同关心的问题是开展校园调查的选题范围", "verb": "说出", "object": "在心理健康、身体素质等方面选择师生共同关心的问题是开展校园调查的选题范围", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在心理健康、身体素质等方面选择师生共同关心的问题是开展校园调查的选题范围是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在心理健康、身体素质等方面选择师生共同关心的问题是开展校园调查的选题范围吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在心理健康、身体素质等方面，选择师生共同关心的问题，", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定调查选题范围"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_1W2aA2JT", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "跨学科学习", "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能说出组织小课题组是开展校园调查的一种组织形式", "verb": "说出", "object": "组织小课题组是开展校园调查的一种组织形式", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：组织小课题组是开展校园调查的一种组织形式是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出组织小课题组是开展校园调查的一种组织形式吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "组织小课题组，开展校园调查，", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定调查组织形式并交流信息", "srcPage": 42, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.55, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_4dFLm3cU", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能正确书写800个左右常用汉字", "verb": "书写", "object": "能正确书写800个左右常用汉字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["问：能正确书写800个左右常用汉字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出能正确书写800个左右常用汉字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能正确书写800个左右常用汉字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识字书写属记忆与技能训练"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_EfqwYJrx", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出甲骨文是已知最早的汉字", "verb": "说出", "object": "甲骨文是已知最早的汉字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：甲骨文是已知最早的汉字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出甲骨文是已知最早的汉字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "知道甲骨文是已知最早的汉字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记性知识，无跨学科思维或实践动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 1.0, "facts": ["甲骨文是已知最早的汉字"], "passed": true}, "dropReason": "模型污染：这句课标原文只存在于历史课标，模型在语文课标的页面上吐出了记忆里的别科原文。接地校验查不出来 —— 引用原文和断言是一起编的，两者当然对得上。"}
{"id": "ca_KUOKHox4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字", "verb": "说出", "object": "第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能用硬笔规范、端正、整洁地书写2500个左右常用汉字。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "书写技能训练，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_MbHhC0ud", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言运用", "statement": "能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息", "verb": "概括", "object": "说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生能读完一篇介绍大熊猫生活习性的短文后，写出其主要特点", "学生能从一份包含图表和文字的校园活动通知中，提取出活动时间、地点和要求"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "提取与整合文本信息", "srcPage": 47, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能概括说明性文字的主要内容或简单的非连续性文本的关键信息", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中的动词‘说出’替换为原文动词‘概括’，并移除了‘第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能’这一非原文对象，使断言直接描述学生应具备的能力。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["说明"]}}
{"id": "ca_ndCKv0OV", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序", "verb": "说明", "object": "事物或程序", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生能用准确的语言向同学介绍一个自然现象（如彩虹）的成因", "学生能用准确的语言向他人说明一个简单实验（如种豆芽）的步骤"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "清晰介绍说明事物或程序", "srcPage": 47, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明事物或程序", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将削平的断言「能说出…」按原文动词改为「能用准确的语言清楚地介绍、说明…」，保留了原文的动词、对象和能力要求。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["说明"]}}
{"id": "ca_zgsfpp5t", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题", "verb": "运用 / 解决", "object": "文本主要信息 / 现实生活中的简单问题", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生阅读一篇关于垃圾分类的短文后，能根据文中信息，正确地将家中的垃圾进行分类投放", "学生阅读一份产品说明书后，能运用其中的主要信息，解决如何正确使用该产品的问题"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用信息解决现实问题", "srcPage": 47, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.952, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能运用文本主要信息解决现实生活中的简单问题", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中的名词性表述“能说出…应能运用…”改回了原文的动词性能力要求“能运用…解决…”，并明确了对象“文本主要信息”和“现实生活中的简单问题”，符合课标原文对学生能力的描述。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["运用", "解决"]}}
{"id": "ca_QQVrIxV7", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能围绕学习活动搜集材料，设计简单的活动方案", "verb": "设计", "object": "简单的活动方案", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生能根据一个学习主题（如'保护环境'）列出需要搜集的材料清单，并规划出活动的步骤", "学生能为一次班级读书会制定一份包含时间、地点、分工和流程的简要计划"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动搜集材料，提供简单的活动设计方案吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "围绕学习活动搜集材料，提供简单的活动设计方案", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定问题并设计方案", "srcPage": 47, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.944, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动搜集材料，提供简单的活动设计方案", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将被削平的‘提供’改回了原文的‘设计’，并明确了动词对象为‘简单的活动方案’，符合学生能力要求。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["设计"]}}
{"id": "ca_aubUqili", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料", "verb": "说出", "object": "第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "调查获取材料属探究与信息交流", "srcPage": 47, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "verbFixedFrom": "能说出第三学段（5~6年级）学生应能围绕学习活动展开调查，从多方面获取活动各阶段的材料"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["investigating", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.742, "facts": []}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:restates-plan", "detail": "原句层：无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS。可判定的能力版本是由它转写 / 拆出的子条"}]}
{"id": "ca_Y7cMtjH7", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出在交流反思中辨别是非、善恶和美丑", "verb": "说出", "object": "在交流反思中辨别是非、善恶和美丑", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：在交流反思中辨别是非、善恶和美丑是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在交流反思中辨别是非、善恶和美丑吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在交流反思中辨别是非、善恶和美丑", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "价值判断，非科学思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "独立验证不通过 —— 没有标准答案：原文是「讨论/探讨」类活动，不是可判定的事实", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}}
{"id": "ca_5P6VQtq5", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出在日常记录中应使用的规范、通行的字体是行楷字", "verb": "说出", "object": "在日常记录中应使用的规范、通行的字体是行楷字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在日常记录中应使用的规范、通行的字体是行楷字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在日常记录中应使用的规范、通行的字体是行楷字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在日常记录中使用规范、通行的行楷字", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记规范，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.714, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_hJnCwl0e", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出在社会生活中认读生字新词时应依据的三者关系是字音、字形、字义", "verb": "说出", "object": "在社会生活中认读生字新词时应依据的三者关系是字音、字形、字义", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在社会生活中认读生字新词时应依据的三者关系是字音、字形、字义是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在社会生活中认读生字新词时应依据的三者关系是字音、字形、字义吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在社会生活中能根据字音、字形、字义三者的关系准确认读、正确理解遇到的生字新词", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类知识，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.778, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_XgWaAcms", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出在讨论问题过程中发表看法时应做到的三点是有中心、有根据、有条理", "verb": "说出", "object": "在讨论问题过程中发表看法时应做到的三点是有中心、有根据、有条理", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在讨论问题过程中发表看法时应做到的三点是有中心、有根据、有条理是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在讨论问题过程中发表看法时应做到的三点是有中心、有根据、有条理吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在讨论问题过程中，能积极发表自己的看法，做到有中心，有根据，有条理", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "强调论证的中心、根据与条理"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["argumentation"], "dropReason": "独立验证不通过 —— 没有标准答案：原文是「讨论/探讨」类活动，不是可判定的事实", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}}
{"id": "ca_uEOIgP8e", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚", "verb": "说出", "object": "在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "语文表达规范，非跨学科思维", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.667, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_XzIpTcX4", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能说出在共同关注的热点问题学习活动中应完成的四个步骤是搜集资料、提取信息、概括观点和确立学习活动主题", "verb": "说出", "object": "在共同关注的热点问题学习活动中应完成的四个步骤是搜集资料、提取信息、概括观点和确立学习活动主题", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在共同关注的热点问题学习活动中应完成的四个步骤是搜集资料、提取信息、概括观点和确立学习活动主题是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在共同关注的热点问题学习活动中应完成的四个步骤是搜集资料、提取信息、概括观点和确立学习活动主题吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能就共同关注的热点问题搜集资料，提取信息，概括观点，确立学习活动主题", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定活动步骤与设计方案", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.683, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_wvs6gCpa", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "呈现设计方案属于解释与设计", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.548, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_guSTydlN", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出在学习活动中呈现学习成果时可使用的四种形式是文字、图表、图画和照片", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习活动中呈现学习成果时可使用的四种形式是文字、图表、图画和照片", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习活动中呈现学习成果时可使用的四种形式是文字、图表、图画和照片是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在学习活动中呈现学习成果时可使用的四种形式是文字、图表、图画和照片吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能围绕学习活动开展调查，用文字、图表、图画、照片等形式呈现学习成果", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类知识，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.613, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_swmgn0LN", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "statement": "能说出在学习活动中获取资料时可利用的渠道是图书馆等多种渠道", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习活动中获取资料时可利用的渠道是图书馆等多种渠道", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习活动中获取资料时可利用的渠道是图书馆等多种渠道是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在学习活动中获取资料时可利用的渠道是图书馆等多种渠道吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能利用图书馆等多种渠道获取资料，整理相关学习内容，完善自己的认识，撰写活动总结", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定获取资料的渠道", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.741, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_TSILelvD", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言运用", "statement": "能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述", "verb": "说出", "object": "在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在阅读过程中能把握主要内容，并通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并陈述表达理解的三种方式", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.647, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_63WQf5pd", "discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "statement": "能说出在介绍所读作品基本脉络时应理清的内容是行文思路", "verb": "说出", "object": "在介绍所读作品基本脉络时应理清的内容是行文思路", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在介绍所读作品基本脉络时应理清的内容是行文思路是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在介绍所读作品基本脉络时应理清的内容是行文思路吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能理清行文思路，用多种形式介绍所读作品的基本脉络", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "语文表达规范，非跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.692, "facts": []}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着拼音卡片准确拼读出‘b-á→bá’等音节", "能在田字格中正确书写‘zh’、‘ch’等声母和‘ang’、‘eng’等韵母"], "assessment": "{{name}}能看着拼音卡片拼读出'b-á→bá'这样的音节吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 14, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "能准确地拼读音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "拼音拼读与书写属基础技能训练", "splitFrom": "ca_UiMzwsV6"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_npnfQi7n", "statement": "能准确地拼读音节", "verb": "拼读", "object": "音节", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据第二条“能在田字格中正确书写‘zh’、‘ch’等声母和‘ang’、‘eng’等韵母”描述的是“书写”能力，与能力断言“拼读音节”不符。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能准确地拼读音节’，能力断言‘能准确地拼读音节’是对此的忠实转述。提意见者混淆了‘拼读’与‘书写’两个独立要求，且未看到原文。", "quote": "能准确地拼读音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能看着拼音卡片准确拼读出‘b-á→bá’等音节", "能在田字格中正确书写‘zh’、‘ch’等声母和‘ang’、‘eng’等韵母"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着拼音卡片拼读出音节，并在本子上正确写出声母和韵母吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 14, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "能准确地拼读音节，正确书写声母、韵母和音节。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "拼音拼读与书写属基础技能训练", "splitFrom": "ca_UiMzwsV6"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_DwSzxbSW", "statement": "能正确书写声母、韵母和音节", "verb": "书写", "object": "声母、韵母和音节", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据语境和部首，在字典中快速找到多音字并选择正确读音", "能通过查阅词典，准确理解生僻词语在文中的具体含义"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}，在读到不认识的字词时，是不是会主动去查字典、词典，而且能用对方法？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "1. 能熟练地使用字典、词典独立识字，会用多种检字方法。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "工具使用，非思维或实践类别", "splitFrom": "ca_4AcQgaPb"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_AkkBE4ts", "statement": "能熟练地使用字典独立识字", "verb": "使用", "object": "字典独立识字", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据语境和部首，在字典中快速找到多音字并选择正确读音", "能通过查阅词典，准确理解生僻词语在文中的具体含义"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}，在读到不认识的字词时，是不是会主动去查字典、词典，而且能用对方法？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "1. 能熟练地使用字典、词典独立识字，会用多种检字方法。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "工具使用，非思维或实践类别", "splitFrom": "ca_4AcQgaPb"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_UuRKusxH", "statement": "能熟练地使用词典独立识字", "verb": "使用", "object": "词典独立识字", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能快速浏览一篇陌生文章并准确说出其主要内容和结构", "能在规定时间内阅读多篇不同题材的文章并提取关键信息"], "assessment": "你观察{{name}}读课外书时，他能很快抓住书的重点吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能较熟练地运用略读和浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定阅读目的并获取信息", "splitFrom": "ca_ZrSbtGS6"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "id": "ca_b4VQQPpD", "statement": "能较熟练地运用略读的方法，扩大阅读范围", "verb": "运用", "object": "略读的方法，扩大阅读范围", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "思维能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能快速浏览一篇陌生文章并准确说出其主要内容和结构", "能在规定时间内阅读多篇不同题材的文章并提取关键信息"], "assessment": "你观察{{name}}读课外书时，他能很快抓住书的重点吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能较熟练地运用略读和浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定阅读目的并获取信息", "splitFrom": "ca_ZrSbtGS6"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "id": "ca_vMXiLmzt", "statement": "能较熟练地运用浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围", "verb": "运用", "object": "浏览的方法，扩大阅读范围", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能从积累的词句库中，为描写人物兴奋的心情挑选并使用一个特定的比喻句。", "在写一篇说明文时，能为了使语言更生动，选择并使用之前积累的一个拟人化词语。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说上次写作文时，你是怎么决定用哪种风格来写的吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "发现并积累不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落，能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "根据表达需要选择词句，属于建构表达与交流信息", "splitFrom": "ca_hqaAnBWy"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用", "repair": {"why": "补全了宾语“不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落”，使能力对象明确可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "id": "ca_tSXNvU5x", "statement": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "verb": "表达", "object": "需要和习惯选择不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能从积累的词句库中，为描写人物兴奋的心情挑选并使用一个特定的比喻句。", "在写一篇说明文时，能为了使语言更生动，选择并使用之前积累的一个拟人化词语。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说上次写作文时，你是怎么决定用哪种风格来写的吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "发现并积累不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落，能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "根据表达需要选择词句，属于建构表达与交流信息", "splitFrom": "ca_hqaAnBWy"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用", "repair": {"why": "补全了宾语“不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落”，使能力对象明确可判定。", "grounding": 1.0}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "id": "ca_WVk3SK7E", "statement": "能根据自己的表达需要和习惯使用不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "verb": "表达", "object": "需要和习惯使用不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：证据仅展示单一修辞手法（比喻、拟人）的使用，无法判断是否达到'不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落'这一复杂能力的整体水平"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落。断言是对此的忠实转述。意见中提及的证据问题（如单一修辞手法）是对具体教学或评价情境的质疑，而非对能力断言本身与课标原文一致性的质疑。", "quote": "发现并积累不同语境下具有个性化特征的词句和段落，能根据自己的表达需要和习惯选择使用。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能圈出文章中的事实陈述与作者的主观判断，并说明哪句是观点、哪句是材料", "能解释作者用某个例子是为了证明哪个具体观点，并说明两者如何对应"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇文章里哪句话是作者的看法，哪句话是用来支持它的事实吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "阅读简单议论性文章，能区分观点与材料，并能解释观点与材料之间的联系；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "辨析因果联系并基于证据论证", "splitFrom": "ca_mNUbTAWd"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["cause-effect"], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "argumentation"], "id": "ca_ZR9h6Ecy", "statement": "能区分观点与材料", "verb": "区分", "object": "观点与材料", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": "阅读与鉴赏", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能圈出文章中的事实陈述与作者的主观判断，并说明哪句是观点、哪句是材料", "能解释作者用某个例子是为了证明哪个具体观点，并说明两者如何对应"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我这篇文章里哪句话是作者的看法，哪句话是用来支持它的事实吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 49, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "阅读简单议论性文章，能区分观点与材料，并能解释观点与材料之间的联系；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "辨析因果联系并基于证据论证", "splitFrom": "ca_mNUbTAWd"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["cause-effect"], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "argumentation"], "id": "ca_DGQ5e238", "statement": "能解释观点与材料之间的联系", "verb": "解释", "object": "观点与材料之间的联系", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能将课文中的比喻句、拟人句分别归类到不同笔记本页面", "能按主题（如思乡、爱国）整理并摘抄多首古诗中的名句"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把课本里那些写得特别生动的句子和诗，分门别类地整理到自己的本子上吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句，分析作品表现手法的作用；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类整理即找规律与分析数据", "splitFrom": "ca_5vWXdeJP", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句是课标对整个义务教育阶段的能力要求，诊断指出其跨度过大。为使其可判定，根据学段要求将其限定为中高年级（G5），表述完全来自原句，并确保对象和行为明确、可观察。"}, "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "id": "ca_bCNzBZSs", "statement": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语", "verb": "整理", "object": "富有表现力的词语", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据是摘抄和归类句子，不是对词语的分类整理；比喻句、拟人句是修辞手法，不是词语；古诗名句按主题整理是内容归纳，不是词语分类"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能分类整理富有表现力的词语’，断言是原文的忠实摘录。提意见者混淆了‘词语’与‘句子’、‘修辞手法’等概念，但原文的表述是清晰且独立的。", "quote": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能将课文中的比喻句、拟人句分别归类到不同笔记本页面", "能按主题（如思乡、爱国）整理并摘抄多首古诗中的名句"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把课本里那些写得特别生动的句子和诗，分门别类地整理到自己的本子上吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句，分析作品表现手法的作用；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类整理即找规律与分析数据", "splitFrom": "ca_5vWXdeJP", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句是课标对整个义务教育阶段的能力要求，诊断指出其跨度过大。为使其可判定，根据学段要求将其限定为中高年级（G5），表述完全来自原句，并确保对象和行为明确、可观察。"}, "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "id": "ca_B9g9de3m", "statement": "能分类整理精彩段落", "verb": "整理", "object": "精彩段落", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：标注学段G1–G9跨度太大，小学低年级（如一年级）学生尚不具备按主题（如思乡、爱国）分类整理古诗名句的抽象概括能力"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句’，断言‘能分类整理精彩段落’是对此的忠实简化。提意见者基于对学段适宜性的教学经验判断，但这并非断言本身不忠实于课标的要求。", "quote": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言运用", "审美创造"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能将课文中的比喻句、拟人句分别归类到不同笔记本页面", "能按主题（如思乡、爱国）整理并摘抄多首古诗中的名句"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能把课本里那些写得特别生动的句子和诗，分门别类地整理到自己的本子上吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句，分析作品表现手法的作用；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类整理即找规律与分析数据", "splitFrom": "ca_5vWXdeJP", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句是课标对整个义务教育阶段的能力要求，诊断指出其跨度过大。为使其可判定，根据学段要求将其限定为中高年级（G5），表述完全来自原句，并确保对象和行为明确、可观察。"}, "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "id": "ca_CS4zA2qi", "statement": "能分类整理经典诗文名句", "verb": "整理", "object": "经典诗文名句", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据仅涉及比喻句、拟人句的归类和按主题摘抄古诗名句，但能力断言是‘能分类整理经典诗文名句’，证据未覆盖‘经典诗文名句’的全部范围（如非比喻、拟人的名句，或非古诗的名句），也未体现‘整理’的完整过程（如筛选、辨析、系统化）"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能分类整理…经典诗文名句’，能力断言‘能分类整理经典诗文名句’是对此的忠实转述。意见中关于证据覆盖范围和整理过程的质疑，属于对教学实施细节的讨论，而非对能力断言本身是否忠实于课标的质疑。", "quote": "能分类整理富有表现力的词语、精彩段落和经典诗文名句", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能写简单的记实作文和想象作文，内容具体，感情真实。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类要求，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 20, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_sTsIxpdv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_CJHAqdMm", "statement": "能说出记实作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "verb": "说出", "object": "记实作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能说出记实作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实’是让学生复述课标原文，属于知识记忆，而非运用‘具体、感情真实’进行写作的能力。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据‘问：记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实是什么？能答出即为会’只能证明学生能背诵或复述要求，无法证明学生能‘说出’这些要求（即理解和解释），更无法证明其作文能达到这些要求。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能写简单的记实作文和想象作文’，其中‘内容具体，感情真实’是对作文内容的具体要求。改写后的断言‘能说出记实作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实’是对原文要求的一种忠实转述和理解性检查，将‘写’的要求转化为‘说出’（即理解和解释）这一可观察的能力行为，符合将课标要求转化为具体能力断言的原则。提意见者混淆了‘复述原文’与‘理解和解释原文要求’，而‘说出’本身就属于一种能力。", "quote": "能写简单的记实作文和想象作文，内容具体，感情真实。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出记实作文和想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能写简单的记实作文和想象作文，内容具体，感情真实。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类要求，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 20, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_sTsIxpdv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_xehZrK7R", "statement": "能说出想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "verb": "说出", "object": "想象作文的内容要求是具体、感情真实", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是对课标原文的复述要求，不是学生能力。学生能说出内容要求不等于能写出符合要求的作文，这是知识记忆而非能力表现。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能写简单的记实作文和想象作文’，其中‘内容具体，感情真实’是对作文的要求。将‘能写’转述为‘能说出…内容要求’，是将写作能力拆解为对写作要求的陈述能力，这在教学评价中常作为观察学生是否理解写作标准的可观察行为，属于能力表现的一种形式。意见认为这是知识记忆而非能力，但‘能说出’本身是可观察的言语行为，符合能力锚点的定义。", "quote": "能写简单的记实作文和想象作文，内容具体，感情真实。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "跨学科学习", "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出龙凤是中华文化意象吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "探寻日常生活中龙凤、松竹梅兰等中华文化意象", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "文化意象识记，非思维或实践训练", "srcPage": 42, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_irEeQk5z", "stageFixedFrom": "G5-G6", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "id": "ca_W7Ter2ps", "statement": "能说出龙凤是中华文化意象", "verb": "说出", "object": "龙凤是中华文化意象", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能说出龙凤是中华文化意象’是知识复述，不是可观察的能力表现，无法判断一个孩子是否真正‘会’。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'探寻日常生活中龙凤…等中华文化意象'，'能说出龙凤是中华文化意象'是对该要求的忠实、可观察的能力转述。", "quote": "探寻日常生活中龙凤、松竹梅兰等中华文化意象", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "跨学科学习", "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出龙凤、松竹梅兰是中华文化意象吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "探寻日常生活中龙凤、松竹梅兰等中华文化意象", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "文化意象识记，非思维或实践训练", "srcPage": 42, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_irEeQk5z", "stageFixedFrom": "G5-G6", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "id": "ca_JbM3iZw3", "statement": "能说出松竹梅兰是中华文化意象", "verb": "说出", "object": "松竹梅兰是中华文化意象", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"]}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语文表达规范，非跨学科思维", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_uEOIgP8e"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_ePSPWrfD", "statement": "能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式", "verb": "说出", "object": "在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言要求学生复述课标原文中的三点要求，属于对课程内容的记忆，而非可观察的语文能力；无法据此判断一个具体孩子在真实表达情境中是否能做到选择恰当的表达方式"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文是‘能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识’，这是一个完整的句子，主语是‘能’（即学生），描述的是学生应具备的综合表达能力。而改写后的断言‘能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式’，将原文中并列的多个要求（观察、抓住特征、选择表达方式、安排详略、条理清楚）简化并扭曲为‘说出三点是选择恰（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语文表达规范，非跨学科思维", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_uEOIgP8e"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_pbRBNCGi", "statement": "能说出在表达时应做到的三点是合理安排详略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在表达时应做到的三点是合理安排详略", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：能说出三点具体是哪三点——这是在要求学生复述知识点，不是在检验一个可观察的表达能力。一个学生能背诵这三点，不代表他真的能‘合理安排详略’。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘合理安排详略’是教学目标或写作要求，本身不是一个可独立判断‘会不会’的学生能力。学生的能力应该是‘写作时能对材料进行详略安排’。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确列出了‘合理安排详略’作为学生应能做到的表达要求之一。改写断言‘能说出在表达时应做到的三点是合理安排详略’是对原文中‘选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识’这三点（或其要点）的忠实转述和概括，符合判据允许的拆句和转述原则。", "quote": "能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言建构与运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言建构与运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在表达时应做到的三点是选择恰当的表达方式、合理安排详略和条理清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语文表达规范，非跨学科思维", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_uEOIgP8e"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_pkt3vpk4", "statement": "能说出在表达时应做到的三点是条理清楚", "verb": "说出", "object": "在表达时应做到的三点是条理清楚", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是对课标原文的复述要求，不是学生能展示的语文能力；学生无法通过‘说出三点’来证明自己具备表达能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文是‘能多角度观察生活，抓住事物特征，选择恰当的表达方式，合理安排详略，条理清楚地表达自己的感受和认识’，这是一个整体的能力要求。改写后的断言‘能说出在表达时应做到的三点是条理清楚’将原文的复合能力要求简化为对‘条理清楚’这一点的复述，且‘能说出三点’本身并非课标要求的语文能力，而是对知识要点的复述，这偏离了原文对学生‘表达自己的感受和认识’这一实践能（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时，可以用哪两种形式？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "呈现设计方案属于解释与设计", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_wvs6gCpa"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "id": "ca_PakDhNTs", "statement": "能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用流程图", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用流程图", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这条能力断言描述的是对学习活动中呈现形式的知识性了解，无法判断一个具体孩子是否真正具备使用流程图呈现活动设计方案的能力。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据是询问并背诵两种形式，这证明的是对知识点的记忆，而非‘能说出’（即能运用）流程图的能力。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能说出...可使用流程图’更接近对课程内容的陈述或教学目标，而非学生可观察、可评估的语文能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案'，'能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用流程图'是对该要求的忠实转述。'能说出'本身是可观察、可评估的行为，是能力的一部分。", "quote": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维发展与提升", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维发展与提升"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用的两种形式是流程图和文字吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "呈现设计方案属于解释与设计", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_wvs6gCpa"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "id": "ca_KQVDenaS", "statement": "能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用文字", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用文字", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是对课标表述的复述，不是学生能力。学生不会被要求‘说出呈现活动设计方案时可使用文字’，这是编写说明或教学建议。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案'，断言'能说出在学习活动中呈现活动设计方案时可使用文字'是对原文的忠实转述，学生确实被要求掌握这一能力。", "quote": "能用流程图、文字等形式呈现活动设计方案", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在阅读文学作品时，表达对作品理解可以使用朗读、概括和讲述这三种方式吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在阅读过程中能把握主要内容，并通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并陈述表达理解的三种方式", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_TSILelvD"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "id": "ca_Dgtdwp5U", "statement": "能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用朗读", "verb": "说出", "object": "在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用朗读", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是一条关于课标规定的知识问答，不是学生能够展示的实际能力；证据只要求复述课标原文，不涉及任何实际操作或运用"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。原文的主语是学生‘能把握主要内容，并通过…表达对作品的理解’，而改写的断言‘能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用朗读’主语虽是学生，但内容变成了对课标规定本身的知识性复述（即‘知道可以用朗读来表达’），而非课标要求的‘能通过朗读来表达理解’这一实际操作能力。意见指出它更接近对课标知识的问答，而非可观察的能力表现，此判断成立。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，在阅读文学作品时，你能说出哪三种方式来表达对作品的理解吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在阅读过程中能把握主要内容，并通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并陈述表达理解的三种方式", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_TSILelvD"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "id": "ca_hhpy4KUa", "statement": "能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用概括", "verb": "说出", "object": "在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用概括", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是对课标原文的复述要求，不是学生能力。学生能力应是'能用概括的方式表达对文学作品的理解'，而非'能说出表达方式有哪些'"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'通过...概括...等方式，表达对作品的理解'。改写后的断言'能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用概括'是对这一要求的忠实转述，它描述了学生能够识别并陈述出'概括'是表达理解的一种方式，这本身是一种可观察的、关于能力的认知行为，符合课标要求。", "quote": "在阅读过程中能把握主要内容，并通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言运用", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言运用"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用的三种方式是朗读、概括和讲述是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，在阅读文学作品时，表达对作品的理解可以用哪三种方式？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "语文", "srcText": "在阅读过程中能把握主要内容，并通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并陈述表达理解的三种方式", "srcPage": 49, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_TSILelvD"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "id": "ca_aqianqex", "statement": "能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用讲述", "verb": "说出", "object": "在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用讲述", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：断言描述的是课标原文的复述（询问三种方式是什么），而非学生的能力（如'能运用讲述方式表达对作品的理解'）。这是知识回忆，不是能力。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据要求'答案与课标原文一致'，这是考察机械记忆，无法证明学生是否具备在实际阅读中运用讲述方式表达理解的能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解'。断言'能说出在阅读文学作品过程中表达对作品理解时可使用讲述'是对原文要求的忠实转述，即学生能知道并说明讲述是表达理解的一种方式。'能说出'本身是一种可观察的能力表现，不应被视为纯粹的知识回忆。", "quote": "通过朗读、概括、讲述等方式，表达对作品的理解", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生在回答时，能准确说出《红岩》和《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品。", "学生在被问及《革命烈士诗抄》时，能指出它也是一部革命文学作品。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《红岩》和《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_0PmQ3XrM", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生以已知的革命文学作品名单为基础，进行辨识和归类，其行为（列举并说明归属）是旁观者可以观察和判定的。", "srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 40, "srcText": "阅读革命文学作品，如《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》等", "crosscuttingWhy": "列举与归类，属识记与分类，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_P9gPDTGW"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_BJiThwjS", "statement": "能列举出《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》这三部作品中的两部", "verb": "举出", "object": "《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》这三部作品中的两部", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：能列举出三部作品中的两部，这只是对阅读篇目的记忆要求，不是语文能力。掌握证据是能说出作品体裁，说明实际考察的是作品分类而非列举能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'阅读革命文学作品'，并列举了具体篇目。'能列举出其中两部'是对'阅读'这一行为的可观察、可检验的转述，属于忠实的能力断言。意见将'列举'等同于'记忆'并否定其能力属性，但'能说出'本身就是一种可观察的语文能力表现。", "quote": "阅读革命文学作品，如《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》等", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "语文", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "文化传承与理解", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化传承与理解"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生在回答时，能准确说出《红岩》和《红星照耀中国》是革命文学作品。", "学生在被问及《革命烈士诗抄》时，能指出它也是一部革命文学作品。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出《红岩》和《红星照耀中国》都是革命文学作品吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_0PmQ3XrM", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生以已知的革命文学作品名单为基础，进行辨识和归类，其行为（列举并说明归属）是旁观者可以观察和判定的。", "srcSubject": "语文", "srcPage": 40, "srcText": "阅读革命文学作品，如《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》等", "crosscuttingWhy": "列举与归类，属识记与分类，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_P9gPDTGW"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_7HRfRGPQ", "statement": "能说明《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》都属于革命文学作品", "verb": "说明", "object": "《革命烈士诗抄》《红岩》《红星照耀中国》都属于革命文学作品", "reviewedBy": []}