{"id": "ca_UARVaB2Z", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能与他人互动交流，对赞扬、道歉、致谢等作出回应，用语礼貌", "verb": "交流", "object": "对赞扬、道歉、致谢等作出回应，用语礼貌", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用 'Thank you' 或 'You're welcome' 回应他人的感谢", "能用 'I'm sorry' 或 'That's okay' 回应他人的道歉"], "assessment": "{{name}}，当别人夸奖或感谢你时，你会怎么说呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-2 能与他人互动交流，对赞扬、道歉、致谢等作出回应，用语礼貌。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言交际，非科学思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分", "by": "decidability-gate"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_XykJLq2g", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能积极思考，尝试就不懂之处提出疑问", "verb": "尝试", "object": "就不懂之处提出疑问", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能在小组讨论时，指着新单词或句子问老师或同学是什么意思。", "能在阅读后，主动举手分享自己没看懂的地方并寻求帮助。", "你能发现{{name}}在遇到不懂的地方时，会主动提出问题吗？"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-5 对英语有好奇心，在阅读配图故事、对话等简单语篇材料时，能积极思考，尝试就不懂之处提出疑问。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'能积极思考,尝试就不懂之处提出疑问'是通用学习态度描述，缺乏对英语学科具体能力的指向，无法判定学生是否掌握"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS"}
{"id": "ca_R92qHDfg", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能模仿说话者的语音、语调", "verb": "模仿", "object": "说话者的语音、语调", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能准确复述教师读出的英文句子并模仿其升降调", "能在跟读录音时区分并再现角色对话中的不同语气"], "assessment": "您可以问{{name}}：刚才妈妈读的那句话哪里要升高声音，哪里要降低声音？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-6 在跟读简短的音视频材料时，能模仿说话者的语音、语调。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语音模仿属技能训练"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_HGDQgGb9", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过读、看等方式认读或说出典型的中外文化标志物", "verb": "认读或说出", "object": "典型的中外文化标志物", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识", "语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能看着图片认读出圣诞树、灯笼等文化标志物的名称", "能看着图片说出长城、金字塔等文化标志物的名称"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能认出这些图片里的文化标志物并说出它们的名字吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-8 能通过读、看等方式，认读或说出典型的中外文化标志物。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记文化标志物，非跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能通过读、看等方式,认读或说出典型的中外文化标志物", "repair": {"why": "保留了课标原句的核心意思（认读或说出文化标志物），将其转化为一个可直接观察和判定的能力表述，并补充了具体行为证据。", "grounding": 1.0}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.882, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["典型的中外文化标志物是读、看等方式认读或说出的对象。"]}}
{"id": "ca_j3MnDYGL", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能正确书写所学的单词和句子", "verb": "书写", "object": "所学的单词和句子", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能听写10个学过的英语单词，拼写全部正确", "能抄写一个完整的英语句子，大小写和标点符号都正确"], "assessment": "你能请{{name}}听写几个英语单词，或者让他抄写一个英语句子，看看拼写和书写是否准确吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-9 能正确书写所学的单词和句子。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "机械书写，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "repairAttempt": {"fixable": true, "noop": true, "why": "复审认为原断言本身没问题：原句本身是可判定的能力断言，无需修改，只需补充具体证据使其可观察。"}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能正确书写所学的单词和句子’是章节标题或教学目标，不是可对具体孩子判断‘会/不会’的能力断言"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能正确书写所学的单词和句子’，该断言是对原文的忠实转述，且‘能正确书写’是可观察、可判定的能力行为。", "quote": "1-9 能正确书写所学的单词和句子。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_FAmnJBnr", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能参照范例，仿写简单句", "verb": "仿写", "object": "简单句", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能根据范例 'I like apples.' 仿写出 'I like bananas.'", "能参照范例 'The cat is black.' 仿写出 'The dog is white.'"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着例句，自己写出一个新句子吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-10 能参照范例，仿写简单句。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "参照范例建模并仿写"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["modeling", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_xF3XsGBa", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "乐于观察生活中的语言和文化现象，尝试从不同角度看待事物", "verb": "尝试", "object": "从不同角度看待事物", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能指着街道招牌讨论中外文化的异同", "能在日记里记录并比较中外节日的不同习俗"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你最近有没有发现身边有趣的中外文化现象？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-11 乐于观察生活中的语言和文化现象，尝试从不同角度看待事物。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“乐于观察”是态度倾向，无法对具体孩子判定“会/不会”；“尝试从不同角度看待事物”是思维习惯描述，不是可测量的能力点"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "“能指着街道招牌讨论中外文化的异同”需要先具备相关文化知识和语言表达能力，证据本身预设了多项未声明的前提能力"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是情感态度与价值观目标，描述学生的主观意愿（乐于）和思维倾向（尝试），并非可观察、可判定的具体能力点，无法改写为‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是情感态度与价值观目标，描述学生的主观意愿（乐于）和思维倾向（尝试），并非可观察、可判定的具体能力点，无法改写为‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的能力断言。"}
{"id": "ca_5uUx2BjP", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "愿意参与课堂活动，与同伴一起通过模仿、表演等方式学习英语", "verb": "模仿", "object": "表演等方式学习英语", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能在小组活动中模仿角色对话并配合肢体动作", "能在同伴表演时主动接话或做出回应"], "assessment": "{{name}}在英语课上会主动和同学一起演故事吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-12 愿意参与课堂活动，与同伴一起通过模仿、表演等方式学习英语。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的情感态度目标（愿意参与），而非可观察、可判定的具体能力行为。。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是学生应达到的情感态度目标（愿意参与），而非可观察、可判定的具体能力行为。"}}
{"id": "ca_SeaUwxdJ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过简短语篇了解世界主要国家的生活习俗、饮食习惯、文化传统等，并初步比较文化异同", "verb": "了解并比较", "object": "通过简短语篇的世界主要国家的生活习俗、饮食习惯、文化传统等", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识", "语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能从一篇介绍万圣节的短文中，找出关于食物或活动的信息", "能说出一个关于某国家习俗或传统的简单事实，并与另一个国家进行对比"], "assessment": "{{name}}能从一篇介绍万圣节的短文中找出关于食物或活动的信息吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-4 能通过简短语篇了解世界主要国家的生活习俗、饮食习惯、文化传统等，初步比较文化异同。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇信息并比较文化异同", "stageFixedFrom": "G3-G4"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能通过简短语篇了解世界主要国家的生活习俗、饮食习惯、文化传统等,初步比较文化异同", "repair": {"why": "保留了课标原句的核心要求和结构，将“能通过简短语篇了解...并初步比较...”整合为一个连贯的能力断言，使其更符合“能+动词+对象”的句式，并确保了证据的具体性。学段问题由原句本身覆盖2-4年级，无需调整。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（能从语篇中找出信息并对比文化异同的能力要求较高，属于G7-G9的内容，G3-G4）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 51 页：第51页表23「二级（5～6年级）学业质量标准」2-4，学段 G3-G4 → G5-G6"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"]}
{"id": "ca_Krmjdt2y", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能借助图片、上下文线索尝试推测语篇中生词的含义", "verb": "尝试", "object": "推测语篇中生词的含义", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能指着故事书插图，说出生词可能表示图中物体或动作", "能读完句子后，用上下文解释生词在句中的大概意思"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着图和前后句子猜出不认识的词是什么意思吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-5 能借助图片、上下文线索尝试推测语篇中生词的含义。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析线索并建构解释"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_vT67arL4", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能流利地朗读课内所学语篇，发音清晰，语音、语调基本正确", "verb": "朗读", "object": "课内所学语篇，发音清晰，语音、语调基本正确", "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用正常语速朗读课文,单词发音准确,句子停顿自然", "能模仿录音的升调降调读出疑问句和陈述句,不漏词不添词"], "assessment": "请{{name}}朗读一篇课文,听听他的发音是否清楚,语调是否像平时说话一样自然?", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-7 能流利地朗读课内所学语篇，发音清晰，语音、语调基本正确。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "朗读技能，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分", "by": "decidability-gate"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_nxU6ege4", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能围绕相关主题与他人交流，表达自己的情感、态度和观点，基本达到交际的目的", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的情感、态度和观点，基本达到交际的目的", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用英语简单描述自己为什么喜欢或不喜欢某事，并给出一个理由", "能参与小组讨论，针对一个话题说出至少两句自己的看法，并尝试回应同伴的观点"], "assessment": "你家孩子能用英语表达自己对一件事的感受和想法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-8 能围绕相关主题与他人交流，表达自己的情感、态度和观点，基本达到交际的目的。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言为'能围绕相关主题与他人交流...基本达到交际的目的'，这是一个泛化的宏观能力描述，无法直接用于判断某个具体学生是否'会'，其掌握证据已将其分解为可操作的具体表现，但断言本身不够具体"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "断言'能围绕相关主题与他人交流,表达自己的情感、态度和观点,基本达到交际的目的'是一个完整的句子，但作为一条可评量的能力点，其主语'能'后面缺乏具体行为和情境的限定，更像一条课程目标或能力概括"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是宏观的课程目标描述，缺乏具体可观察的行为限定，无法直接用于判定单个学生是否掌握。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是宏观的课程目标描述，缺乏具体可观察的行为限定，无法直接用于判定单个学生是否掌握。"}
{"id": "ca_eDMMeFsu", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用简单句子描述一个中外节日习俗或现象，语句通顺", "verb": "描述", "object": "一个中外节日习俗或现象", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能说出春节吃饺子的习俗并用一个句子描述", "能说出圣诞节装饰圣诞树并用一个句子描述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语告诉我，中国的春节和美国的圣诞节有什么不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-9 能用简单的句子描述与中外文化有关的具体现象和事物，语句基本通顺。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "用语言描述节日习俗"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能用简单的句子描述与中外文化有关的具体现象和事物,语句基本通顺", "repair": {"why": "将抽象的‘具体现象和事物’具体化为‘一个中外节日习俗或现象’，使之可判定", "grounding": 0.75}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.682, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_4LL4dCBV", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能运用所学词句讲述一个简单的小故事，表意基本清楚", "verb": "讲述", "object": "一个简单的小故事", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用3-5个简单句子描述图片中的事件，如‘The boy is running. He is happy.’", "能用‘and’或‘then’等连接词将两个简单句子串联成一个小故事"], "assessment": "你可以让{{name}}看一张图片，然后用英语讲讲图片里发生了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-10 能运用所学词句讲述简单的小故事，表意基本清楚。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用词句讲述故事，属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能运用所学词句讲述简单的小故事,表意基本清楚", "repair": {"why": "将‘讲述简单的小故事’改为‘讲述一个简单的小故事’，使对象更具体，符合可判定要求。", "grounding": 1.0}, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.913, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_tczQedAx", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能正确使用大小写字母、标点符号进行书面表达，拼写基本正确", "verb": "使用", "object": "大小写字母、标点符号", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能写出包含大写字母和小写字母的简单句子", "能在句子末尾正确添加句号、问号或感叹号"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能正确写出带标点的英语句子，并拼写常用词吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-11 进行书面表达时，能正确使用大小写字母、标点符号，拼写基本正确。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "基础书写规范，无跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能正确使用大小写字母、标点符号,拼写基本正确", "repair": {"why": "修复了问题诊断指出的证据要求过高问题，保留了课标原句的核心能力要求，使断言具体可判定", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文的主语是学生（2-11 进行书面表达时，能正确使用大小写字母、标点符号，拼写基本正确），改写后的断言主语也是学生，但意见指出该描述是多条技能的合并，无。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": []}
{"id": "ca_aGHs4iAJ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能参照范例仿写简单的贺卡、邀请卡等，语言基本准确", "verb": "仿写", "object": "简单的贺卡、邀请卡等，语言基本准确", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能参照范例，独立写出一张包含称呼、祝福语和署名的生日贺卡", "能仿照邀请卡范例，写出包含活动名称、时间和地点的简单邀请卡"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能照着例子自己写一张贺卡或邀请卡吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-12 能参照范例仿写简单的贺卡、邀请卡等，语言基本准确。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 47% < 62%），不采纳。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 47% < 62%），不采纳"}}
{"id": "ca_DDic3DgN", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用简单的语句描述图片内容，意义连贯，句子形式基本正确", "verb": "描述", "object": "图片内容，意义连贯，句子形式基本正确", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能看着一张公园图片说出'The boy is flying a kite in the park.'", "能用三句以上连贯的话描述一张家庭聚餐图片"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着图片用几句连贯的话把看到的内容说清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-13 能用简单的语句描述图片内容，意义连贯，句子形式基本正确。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述图片并组织语言输出"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["能用简单的语句描述图片内容", "描述图片内容时意义连贯", "描述图片内容时句子形式基本正确"]}}
{"id": "ca_eiCZk5kG", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "愿意通过阅读等方式了解不同的语言和文化现象，尝试从不同角度分析问题", "verb": "尝试", "object": "从不同角度分析问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能主动阅读一本介绍外国节日的英文绘本，并说出至少两个与本国不同的习俗", "能针对同一幅外国儿童生活图片，提出两种不同的观察角度或问题"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你最近读的那本外国节日的书里，有什么让你觉得特别有意思或者和我们不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-14 愿意通过阅读等方式了解不同的语言和文化现象，尝试从不同角度分析问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘愿意通过阅读等方式了解’是情感态度倾向，不是可观测的能力行为；掌握证据中的‘能主动阅读’和‘能提出两种不同观察角度’才属于能力表述"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "证据‘提出两种不同的观察角度或问题’可以证明思维品质，但无法证明‘愿意了解’这种主观意愿，两者不对应"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_urtYtJfa", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能主动举手参与课堂提问或角色扮演，并与同伴围绕主题进行讨论和合作完成学习任务", "verb": "参与", "object": "课堂提问或角色扮演，并与同伴围绕主题进行讨论和合作完成学习任务", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力", "语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能主动举手参与课堂提问或角色扮演", "能与同组同学一起完成一份关于动物的英文海报"], "assessment": "{{name}}在英语课上会不会主动参与讨论，和同学合作完成任务？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 51, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "2-15 对英语学习有兴趣，主动参与课堂活动，与同伴一起围绕相关主题进行讨论，合作完成学习任务。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "主动参与讨论与合作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "对英语学习有兴趣,主动参与课堂活动,与同伴一起围绕相关主题进行讨论,合作完成学习任务", "repair": {"why": "将无法判定的‘兴趣’和‘行为表现’转化为可观察的具体行为，并将‘相关主题’具体化为‘主题’，将‘讨论’和‘合作完成任务’合并为一个可观察的连续行为。", "grounding": 0.71}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：该断言描述的是课堂行为表现，无法对单个学生判断‘会/不会’，更像教学目标而非可测评的能力点"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据仅重复断言本身（能主动举手）和一项具体任务（完成海报），未说明如何通过证据证明‘主动参与’和‘讨论合作’的能力水平"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'主动参与课堂活动，与同伴一起围绕相关主题进行讨论，合作完成学习任务'，断言'能主动举手参与课堂提问或角色扮演，并与同伴围绕主题进行讨论和合作完成学习任务'是对原文的忠实转述，且主语是学生，描述的是可观察的课堂行为表现。", "quote": "主动参与课堂活动，与同伴一起围绕相关主题进行讨论，合作完成学习任务", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_3KiSGiFa", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "表24 三级（7~9年级）学业质量标准3-1 能听懂相关主题的语篇，借助关键词句、图片等复述语篇内容", "verb": "复述", "object": "语篇内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能听懂一段关于环保的短文后，用3-5句英文复述出主要观点和细节", "能根据听到的故事，借助图片提示，用英文描述出故事的起因、经过和结果"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能听懂一段关于环保的短文后，用3-5句英文复述出主要观点和细节吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "表24 三级（7～9年级）学业质量标准3-1 能听懂相关主题的语篇，借助关键词句、图片等复述语篇内容。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "听懂并复述，属于信息获取与交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_nGDgGjdE", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能利用语篇所给提示预测内容的发展", "verb": "预测", "object": "内容的发展", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据标题和插图预测文章大意并说出预测依据", "能读完第一段后预测下一段可能讨论的内容"], "assessment": "{{name}}，读文章时你能根据已有信息猜出后面会讲什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "3-2 能利用语篇所给提示预测内容的发展，判断说话者的身份和关系，推断说话者的情感、态度和观点。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "预测需提问与分析语篇线索"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "analyzing-data"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_3qB34pPN", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能运用一定的阅读策略，借助表格、思维导图等工具梳理书面语篇的主要信息", "verb": "运用", "object": "一定的阅读策略，借助表格、思维导图等工具梳理书面语篇的主要信息", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成一篇课文的思维导图，清晰呈现主要观点和支撑细节", "能根据给定的表格模板，归纳出阅读材料中的人物、事件和结果"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用思维导图或表格把一篇文章的关键信息整理出来吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "3-6 能运用一定的阅读策略，借助表格、思维导图等工具梳理书面语篇的主要信息，理解大意。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "梳理语篇信息，识别模式与结构"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["patterns", "systems"], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_cpaYH76E", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解主要内容，推断隐含信息，表达个人看法，提出合理疑问", "verb": "表达", "object": "个人看法，提出合理疑问", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能复述一篇英语短文的故事情节，并解释主角行为背后的动机", "能针对课文内容提出一个有深度的问题，并解释为什么这个问题值得讨论"], "assessment": "{{name}}，读完一篇英语文章后，你能告诉我故事主要讲了什么，并想到一些课文中没直接说的问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "3-7 在阅读稍长的语篇材料时，能理解主要内容，推断隐含信息，表达个人看法，提出合理疑问，分析和解决问题。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言包含四个并列动作（理解、推断、表达、提出），无法对一个具体孩子判定是否掌握，更像课程目标而非可评估的能力点"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是阅读时应培养的综合能力，而非一个可直接观察和判定的具体能力点。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是阅读时应培养的综合能力，而非一个可直接观察和判定的具体能力点。"}
{"id": "ca_JxbvEgS9", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据口头交际的具体情境，初步运用得体的语言形式，表达自己的情感、态度和观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的情感、态度和观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据老师描述的校园冲突情境，用英语说出自己的看法并给出建议。", "能在角色扮演中，用恰当的语气和词汇表达对朋友行为的赞同或反对。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，当别人和你分享一件事时，你能用英语说出自己的真实想法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "3-9 能根据口头交际的具体情境，初步运用得体的语言形式，表达自己的情感、态度和观点。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'初步运用得体的语言形式'是能力描述，但'根据口头交际的具体情境'作为前提，无法直接判断一个学生是否达到此能力，需进一步细化情境和语言形式的具体标准"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动目标，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力。'初步运用得体的语言形式'和'根据口头交际的具体情境'作为前提，缺乏具体、可观察的判定标准，无法直接用于判断一个学生是否达到此能力。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动目标，而非可直接观察和判定的学生能力。'初步运用得体的语言形式'和'根据口头交际的具体情境'作为前提，缺乏具体、可观察的判定标准"}
{"id": "ca_aTemujyf", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能选用正确的词语、句式和时态，通过口语或书面语篇描述、介绍人和事物，表达个人看法，表意清晰，话语基本通顺", "verb": "表达", "object": "个人看法，表意清晰，话语基本通顺", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用一段连贯的英语书面语介绍一位朋友，包含外貌、性格和共同经历。", "能在口语中描述一个喜欢的物品，并用 'I think...' 句式说明喜欢它的原因。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语介绍一个朋友或你喜欢的东西吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 52, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.95", "srcText": "3-10 能选用正确的词语、句式和时态，通过口语或书面语篇描述、介绍人和事物，表达个人看法，表意清晰，话语基本通顺。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言输出与信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分", "by": "decidability-gate"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_xkGGKVxb", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能讲述具有代表性的中外杰出人物的故事，如科学家等为社会和世界作出贡献的人物，表达基本清楚", "verb": "表达", "object": "基本清楚", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能选一位中国杰出人物和一位外国杰出人物，分别讲出他做了什么、有什么贡献", "能当着同伴的面把一位杰出人物的故事讲完，听者能听清人物、事件和贡献"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能讲讲你知道的一个科学家的故事吗？他做了什么，为什么重要？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 53, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能讲述具有代表性的中外杰出人物的故事，如科学家等为社会和世界作出贡献的人物，表达基本清楚。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 60% < 62%），不采纳。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（断言要求的是「讲述中外杰出人物的故事」，但两条掌握证据都只涉及科学家（袁隆平、爱迪生），且第二条「说明发明对生活的影响」）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 60% < 62%），不采纳"}}
{"id": "ca_UMWv6gQt", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能正确使用所学语言，格式较为规范", "verb": "使用", "object": "所学语言，格式较为规范", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能写出包含主谓宾结构的完整英文句子，且首字母大写、句末有标点。", "能在书信或邮件中正确使用称呼语、正文和落款等格式。"], "assessment": "你可以看看{{name}}写的英文小短文或邮件，句子结构和格式是不是都挺规范的？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 53, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "进行书面表达时，能正确使用所学语言，格式较为规范。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言运用，非科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能正确使用所学语言,格式较为规范'是教学目标描述，不是可判断的具体能力点，无法对单个学生判定'会/不会'"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'能正确使用所学语言，格式较为规范'，断言是原文的忠实转述。作为教学目标描述，它本身就规定了学生应具备的能力，因此是可判断的。", "quote": "进行书面表达时，能正确使用所学语言，格式较为规范。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_YscivMQK", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能参照范例，仿写简短的文段（如回复信函等），语言准确，表意得体", "verb": "仿写", "object": "简短的文段（如回复信函等），语言准确，表意得体", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能参照一封感谢信的范例，独立写出一封格式、内容和语气都相似的简短回信。", "能模仿范例，为邀请朋友参加生日派对写一段意思清楚、语气友好的邀请文字。"], "assessment": "你能给{{name}}看一封示范信，然后让他/她模仿着写一封类似的信，看看他/她写得像不像、意思对不对吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 53, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能参照范例，仿写简短的文段（如回复信函等），语言准确，表意得体。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "仿写文段，建构表达并交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "可判定性过滤器：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分", "by": "decidability-gate"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_RbQBLMGv", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "运用所学语言与他人交流，传递信息，叙述事件，表达看法及观点，实现基本的沟通与交流", "verb": "表达", "object": "看法及观点，实现基本的沟通与交流", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语向同学描述昨天学校发生的趣事，并说明自己的感受", "能就班级活动安排提出建议，并解释为什么这个建议更好"], "assessment": "你可以问问{{name}}：用英语讲讲你最近一次和朋友聊天的内容，你们聊了什么？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 89, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "运用所学语言与他人交流，传递信息，叙述事件，表达看法及观点，实现基本的沟通与交流。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "核心是语言交流与信息传递"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言本身是教学目标描述，不是可判断学生‘会/不会’的具体能力点"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_Yrbd9Gww", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "理解日常生活中的简单语言材料，具备一定的获取和归纳特定信息或关键信息的能力，抓住要点", "verb": "归纳", "object": "特定信息或关键信息的能力，抓住要点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能听懂关于学校日常安排的简短对话，并回答出具体时间和地点", "能从一张简单的英文活动海报中，找出并列出所有关键的活动名称和时间"], "assessment": "你可以给{{name}}听一段简单的英文小对话或看一则通知，然后问问他/她里面提到了什么具体安排？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 89, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能在教师引导和协助下，围绕相应级别的主题，理解日常生活中的简单语言材料，具备一定的获取和归纳特定信息或关键信息的能力，抓住要点，分析、推断隐含的信息；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言包含多个模糊表述，如“一定的获取和归纳特定信息或关键信息的能力”，无法判断单个学生是否“会/不会”，更像一个宏观的课程目标而非可评测的能力点"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是在教师引导和协助下学生应达到的综合能力状态，而非一个可独立观察和判定的具体能力点。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是在教师引导和协助下学生应达到的综合能力状态，而非一个可独立观察和判定的具体能力点。"}
{"id": "ca_FhWzZ54J", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用简单的单词、短语和句子描述与中外文化有关的图片、熟悉的具体现象和事物", "verb": "描述", "object": "与中外文化有关的图片、熟悉的具体现象和事物", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语说出图片中中国春节的习俗，如贴春联、吃饺子", "能用简单句子描述万圣节的装扮和活动，如穿南瓜服、要糖果"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语说说这张图片里有什么，或者描述一个你知道的外国节日吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 89, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用简单的单词、短语和句子描述与中外文化有关的图片、熟悉的具体现象和事物。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述图片与现象，属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_a6aLXvDq", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能用简短的句子描述所学的中外文化节日或物品", "verb": "用简短的句子描述", "object": "所学的中外文化节日或物品", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G3"}, "evidence": ["学生能说出'The Dragon Boat Festival is in summer. People eat zong", "学生能描述'The Mid-Autumn Festival is a family reunion time. We e"], "assessment": "{{name}}能用英语简单描述一下某个中外节日或文化事物吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 89, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能用简短的句子描述所学的与中外文化有关的具体事物；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "用语言描述文化现象"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "statementBefore": "能用简短的句子描述所学的与中外文化有关的具体事物", "repair": {"why": "将泛指的‘具体事物’具体化为‘节日或物品’，使能力可判定，并提供了更具体的描述性证据。", "grounding": 0.81}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：G3学生用简短句子描述中外文化节日，难度适中，但掌握证据中描述Mid-Autumn Festival的句子不完整（'We e'），属于truncated"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生能用简短的句子描述与中外文化有关的具体事物。能力断言'能用简短的句子描述所学的中外文化节日或物品'是对此要求的忠实转述，节日和物品均属于'具体事物'的范畴。意见中提到的证据句子不完整（'We e'）是具体教学材料或评估样本的问题，不影响能力断言本身对课标要求的忠实性。", "quote": "能用简短的句子描述所学的与中外文化有关的具体事物", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_EgierWdk", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "初步具备比较和识别中外文化异同的能力", "verb": "比较", "object": "和识别中外文化异同的能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能说出中国春节和西方圣诞节在庆祝方式上的两个不同点", "能指出中外饮食习惯中至少一个相同之处"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说中国和外国过节时有什么不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 89, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "初步具备比较和识别中外文化异同的能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G3-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标层面的概括性描述（初步具备比较和识别中外文化异同的能力），属于教学方向，而非可观察、可测量的具体学生能力。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（该断言标注为G3–G9，但“比较和识别中外文化异同”在课标中属于文化意识二级目标）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 89 页：第89页表26文化意识学段分项特征「5～6年级」行末句，学段 G3-G9 → G5-G6"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标层面的概括性描述（初步具备比较和识别中外文化异同的能力），属于教学方向，而非可观察、可测量的具体学生能力断言，无法直接用于判断一个具体学生‘会’或‘不会’。"}}
{"id": "ca_ui7xikPj", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过语言简单、主题相关的语篇材料获取并归纳中外文化信息", "verb": "归纳", "object": "中外文化信息", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用一句话概括一篇关于春节习俗短文的主要内容", "能从一篇介绍万圣节的短文中找出两个关键活动并进行分类"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我那篇关于春节的文章主要讲了什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能通过语言简单、主题相关的语篇材料获取并归纳中外文化信息；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇信息并归纳交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": ["能通过语言简单、主题相关的语篇材料获取并归纳中外文化信息"]}}
{"id": "ca_z4bLdFPH", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "在参与交际活动时，意识到文化差异在语言交流中的表现", "verb": "交流", "object": "中的表现", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能指出对话中因文化差异导致的误解并解释原因", "能根据对方文化背景调整自己的表达方式以避免冲突"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说出不同文化的人说话方式有什么不一样吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "在参与交际活动时，意识到文化差异在语言交流中的表现，能尝试采用多种策略进行沟通和交流；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "交际中识别文化差异并交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_jfH499CK", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化现象和文化差异", "verb": "描述", "object": "熟悉的文化现象和文化差异", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语向同学介绍中西方节日（如春节与圣诞节）的至少两个不同习俗", "能用英语描述中西方日常问候方式（如握手与拥抱）的差异并简单说明原因"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语说说中外过节时最不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化现象和文化差异；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述文化现象需解释与交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_hG6DMPAe", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "具备比较、判断常见的中外文化差异性和相似性的基本能力", "verb": "比较", "object": "判断常见的中外文化差异性和相似性的基本能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能列举至少两个中外节日并说明各自的文化意义", "能指出中外饮食习惯中至少一处相同点和一处不同点"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说中国春节和西方圣诞节有什么相同和不同的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "具备比较、判断常见的中外文化差异性和相似性的基本能力；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言为能力描述，但表述为‘具备…基本能力’，更像课程目标而非可直接判断学生‘会/不会’的具体能力点"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据‘能列举…并说明…’与‘能指出…’是具体行为，但作为‘比较、判断’能力的证据略显单薄，未体现‘判断’这一高阶思维过程"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标（‘具备…基本能力’），不是可直接观察和判定的学生具体行为。课标未提供更具体的能力描述或行为动词，无法将其转化为‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的可判定断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标（‘具备…基本能力’），不是可直接观察和判定的学生具体行为。课标未提供更具体的能力描述或行为动词，无法将其转化为‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的可判"}
{"id": "ca_mt5gKcBN", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能提出自己的想法，有条理地表达观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语清晰陈述自己对某个文化现象的看法，并给出至少两个理由", "能在小组讨论中主动发言，用First, Second等词有条理地组织观点"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语说出自己对某个文化现象的看法，并用First, Second这样的词把理由说清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "具有问题意识，能提出自己的想法，有条理地表达观点；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "能力断言'能提出自己的想法,有条理地表达观点'表述笼统，更像教学目标或课程建议，而非可被直接观察和评估的学生具体能力表现"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_VZmyKqyL", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "学会换位思考，尝试多角度认识世界，辩证地看待事物并对事物作出正确的价值判断", "verb": "尝试", "object": "多角度认识世界，辩证地看待事物并对事物作出正确的价值判断", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能在讨论故事角色行为时，说出该角色的另一种可能想法或处境。", "能在观看不同国家的生活视频后，说出至少两种不同的文化习惯并说明其合理性。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，当你遇到和你想法不一样的人或事时，你能试着说出对方可能怎么想吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "学会换位思考，尝试多角度认识世界，辩证地看待事物并对事物作出正确的价值判断；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘辩证地看待事物并对事物作出正确的价值判断’过于抽象，无法对具体学生判断‘会/不会’，更像课程目标而非可测评的能力断言"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "‘说出至少两种不同的文化习惯并说明其合理性’只能证明文化知识描述能力，无法证明‘辩证地看待事物’或‘作出正确的价值判断’"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标（学会...），描述的是学生应达到的综合素养状态，而非一个可直接观察、可判定的具体行为能力。它包含‘辩证地看待事物’、‘作出正确的价值判断’等高度抽象的思维过程，无法转化为‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的句式来对具体学生进行‘会"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标（学会...），描述的是学生应达到的综合素养状态，而非一个可直接观察、可判定的具体行为能力。它包含‘辩证地看待事物’、‘作出正确的价值判断’等高度"}
{"id": "ca_LBzAniwa", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据获取的信息，尝试归纳、概括主要观点和规律，发现问题、分析问题并逐步创造性地解决新的问题", "verb": "概括", "object": "主要观点和规律，发现问题、分析问题并逐步创造性地解决新的问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能从一篇关于节日习俗的短文中，归纳出不同国家庆祝方式的共同点", "能根据观察到的动物迁徙规律，预测下一次迁徙的大致时间"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能从读到的故事里找出主要意思，或者根据发现的规律来预测接下来会发生什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能根据获取的信息，尝试归纳、概括主要观点和规律，发现问题、分析问题并逐步创造性地解决新的问题；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是对思维过程的描述，不是可观察、可评估的学生能力行为"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "证据示例一属于归纳共同点（分析），证据示例二属于预测规律（应用），与断言中'创造性地解决新的问题'不匹配"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_DiK4PnyS", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "判断信息的真实性，作出正确的价值判断，尝试提出合理的疑问", "verb": "尝试", "object": "提出合理的疑问", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对一段英文短文中的观点指出至少一个事实依据或矛盾之处", "能基于对比信息就某文化现象提出一个有依据的开放式问题"], "assessment": "我们可以问{{name}}：读到一则关于外国节日的介绍，你觉得哪些地方可能不太准确，想问什么？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能从不同角度认识和理解世界，对各种观点进行独立思考，判断信息的真实性，作出正确的价值判断，尝试提出合理的疑问。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "论证与交流信息"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘判断信息的真实性,作出正确的价值判断,尝试提出合理的疑问’是课程目标层面的宏观描述，无法直接用于判断一个具体学生是否掌握，缺乏可操作的行为动词和具体情境。"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["argumentation", "communicating"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'对各种观点进行独立思考，判断信息的真实性，作出正确的价值判断，尝试提出合理的疑问'，这条断言是忠实的摘录。", "quote": "对各种观点进行独立思考，判断信息的真实性，作出正确的价值判断，尝试提出合理的疑问", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_E72EF3CQ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能尝试通过模仿、说唱、表演等方式参与语言实践活动", "verb": "尝试", "object": "通过模仿、说唱、表演等方式参与语言实践活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能跟着音频模仿说出完整的英语句子", "能用动作配合表演出英语儿歌的内容"], "assessment": "{{name}}在英语活动中，会主动跟着模仿发音或用动作表演吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 91, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能尝试通过模仿、说唱、表演等方式参与语言实践活动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "参与语言实践活动，核心是交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_6pA2bnw9", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能初步制订自己的学习计划并尝试努力完成", "verb": "尝试", "object": "努力完成", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能列出包含具体学习任务和时间安排的周计划表", "能在一周后对照计划表，标注出已完成和未完成的任务"], "assessment": "你可以和{{name}}聊聊这周的计划表，问问他哪些任务完成了，哪些没完成，下次打算怎么调整？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 91, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能初步制订自己的学习计划并尝试努力完成；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言描述的是通用学习习惯，无法对一个具体孩子在英语学科上答「会/不会」"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是教学建议或课程目标，不是学生在英语学科中可观察、可测量的具体能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_ig8fhNDQ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "积极参与合作学习，初步", "verb": "合作", "object": "学习，初步", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能主动与同伴讨论课文内容并分享自己的观点", "能在小组活动中承担分配的任务并完成汇报"], "assessment": "{{name}}在小组学习时会主动参与讨论吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 91, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "积极参与合作学习，初步养成良好的学习习惯。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘积极参与合作学习,初步’是口号式表述，无法判断具体学生是否掌握"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议（‘积极参与合作学习’）和习惯养成目标（‘初步养成良好的学习习惯’），未描述具体、可观察的学生能力行为。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议（‘积极参与合作学习’）和习惯养成目标（‘初步养成良好的学习习惯’），未描述具体、可观察的学生能力行为。"}
{"id": "ca_dZGrNhhL", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能主动利用图书馆和其他资源进行拓展学习，初步具备自主学习、合作学习、探究学习的能力", "verb": "合作", "object": "学习、探究学习的能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据课堂主题自主去图书馆借阅相关书籍", "能在小组讨论时提出自己查到的资料与同学分享"], "assessment": "你能看看{{name}}是不是会自己找书看，还喜欢和同学讨论新学到的东西吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 91, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能主动利用图书馆和其他资源进行拓展学习，初步具备自主学习、合作学习、探究学习的能力，养成良好的学习习惯。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言描述的是学习方式而非具体能力，无法判断单个学生是否掌握"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是课程目标或教学建议，不是学生可观察的具体能力表现"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "证据仅描述行为表现，未说明如何证明学生具备该能力"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_jTbZaU38", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据写作任务的要求，收集、整理和归纳相关语言和文化知识", "verb": "归纳", "object": "相关语言和文化知识", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据写作主题，从书籍或网络中找出5个相关词汇和2个文化背景事实", "能将收集到的信息按主题分类，列出一个包含词汇、例句和文化要点的提纲"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能为一篇关于节日的作文找到相关词汇和文化知识，并把它们整理成提纲吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 187, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据写作任务的要求，收集、整理和归纳相关语言和文化知识；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "该断言要求'根据写作任务收集、整理和归纳语言和文化知识'，属于初中高年级（G7–G9）写作与学习策略要求，G3–G4 学生尚不具备独立检索、归纳文化知识的能力，学段下限标成 G3 明显偏低"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只要求'找出5个相关词汇和2个文化背景事实'并'列出提纲'，只能证明信息收集与罗列，证明不了断言中的'整理和归纳'（分类、概括、提炼）这一核心能力"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动（收集、整理和归纳），而非学生可观察的具体能力。无法直接转化为对单个学生‘会/不会’的。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动（收集、整理和归纳），而非学生可观察的具体能力。无法直接转化为对单个学生‘会/不会’的判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_E23xNFp8", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据写作提纲，撰写符合文体要求的短文，内容完整，结构清晰，语言通顺，表达得体", "verb": "表达", "object": "体", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据给出的议论文提纲，写出包含论点、论据和结论的完整段落", "能检查并修改短文中不通顺的句子，确保用词正式且符合书信格式要求"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你上次根据提纲写的短文，格式和用词都符合要求吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 187, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据写作提纲，撰写符合文体要求的短文，内容完整，结构清晰，语言通顺，表达得体；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "按提纲设计并输出符合要求的文本"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言描述的是写作的综合要求（内容完整、结构清晰等），无法对一个具体孩子判断‘会/不会’，更像课程目标而非可测评的能力点"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_y3Mwbi8J", "discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据评价标准，对自己和同伴的写作进行评价和修改", "verb": "评价", "object": "标准，对自己和同伴的写作进行评价和修改", "type": "META", "literacy": ["语言能力", "学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用红笔在同伴作文旁标注出一处语法错误并给出修改建议", "能对照评分表为自己的作文打分，并划掉一个不恰当的词换上更准确的表达"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用评分标准给同学的作文提意见，并自己修改吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 187, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据评价标准，对自己和同伴的写作进行评价和修改。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "标注学段G3–G9跨度过大且起点偏低：G3学生刚接触英语书面表达，尚不具备'根据评价标准评价和修改'的元认知能力，课标中此类自评互评要求通常出现在初中阶段（G7起），G3–G6标注缺乏依据"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "'用红笔标注出一处语法错误'只能证明识别错误，无法证明'根据评价标准进行评价和修改'这一能力；且'红笔'是形式要求而非能力证据，与断言中的'评价标准'无对应关系"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 35% < 62%），不采纳。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 35% < 62%），不采纳"}}
{"id": "ca_0D0zqfVQ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出预备级主要满足1~2年级教学需要", "verb": "说出", "object": "预备级主要满足1~2年级教学需要", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：预备级主要满足1~2年级教学需要是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出预备级主要满足1~2年级教学需要吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "预备级主要满足1～2年级教学需要", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述课程定位，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "课程编排说明（开设什么课/怎么排课），不是学生能力。抽取阶段的过滤漏网。"}
{"id": "ca_DwHhVTUf", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "语言知识", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能识别并读出26个大、小写字母", "verb": "识别并读出", "object": "26个大、小写字母", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["学生能看着卡片上的字母说出其名称和发音", "学生能听字母发音后，在纸上写出对应的字母"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出能识别并读出26个大、小写字母吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘识别并读出26个大、小写字母’，断言‘能识别并读出26个大、小写字母’是忠实转述。意见中关于学段范围的讨论，是针对能力锚点标注的学段（G1–G9）是否合理，而非针对断言本身是否忠实于课标原文。断言本身是成立的。", "quote": "识别并读出26个大、小写字母", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "识别并读出26个大、小写字母；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记字母，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 26, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.556, "facts": ["26个大写字母是存在的", "26个小写字母是存在的"], "passed": true}, "statementBefore": "能识别并读出26个大、小写字母", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文动词为‘识别并读出’，是明确的学生行为要求", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：G1–G9学段范围过宽，识别26个字母是G1–G2的基础内容，标注到G9不符合实际教学进度"}]}
{"id": "ca_ObHVLvEg", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出单词是由字母构成的", "verb": "说出", "object": "单词是由字母构成的", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：单词是由字母构成的是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出单词是由字母构成的吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "知道单词由字母构成；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "字母构成单词，结构决定拼写", "srcPage": 27, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function"], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.583, "facts": ["单词由字母构成"]}}
{"id": "ca_9Dx2feL0", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体", "verb": "说出", "object": "语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在语言使用中，语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "理解形式与功能的对应关系", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.833, "facts": ["语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体。"]}}
{"id": "ca_bU1qCy44", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出三级+级别要求围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达", "verb": "说出", "object": "三级+级别要求围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：三级+级别要求围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出三级+级别要求围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达，", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "词汇量要求，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 0.826, "verbatimCoverage": 0.733, "facts": ["围绕相关主题接触并使用约1800个单词进行交流与表达"]}}
{"id": "ca_3KKREUj1", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出三级+级别要求根据实际情况接触并学习相关主题范围内约200个单词", "verb": "说出", "object": "三级+级别要求根据实际情况接触并学习相关主题范围内约200个单词", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：三级+级别要求根据实际情况接触并学习相关主题范围内约200个单词是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出三级+级别要求根据实际情况接触并学习相关主题范围内约200个单词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "另外可以根据实际情况接触并学习相关主题范围内约200个单词，", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "记忆与积累，非跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.733, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_J2Y2xsnu", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出三级语法知识要求初步意识到语言使用中的语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体", "verb": "说出", "object": "三级语法知识要求初步意识到语言使用中的语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：三级语法知识要求初步意识到语言使用中的语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出三级语法知识要求初步意识到语言使用中的语法知识是\"形式—意义—使用\"的统一体吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "1. 初步意识到语言使用中的语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，明确学习语法的目的是在语境中运用语法知识理解和表达意义；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语法形式与功能的对应关系"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function", "patterns"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.684, "facts": ["语言使用中的语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体", "学习语法的目的是在语境中运用语法知识理解和表达意义"], "passed": true}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_r6jcHroF", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能表达语篇是表达意义的语言单位", "verb": "表达", "object": "语篇是表达意义的语言单位", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生能用自己的话解释为什么一段文字是一个语篇", "学生能举例说明一个语篇是如何表达意义的"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出语篇是表达意义的语言单位吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "语篇是表达意义的语言单位", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言知识概念，非跨学科思维或实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 1.0, "facts": ["语篇是表达意义的语言单位"], "passed": true}, "statementBefore": "能说出语篇是表达意义的语言单位", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将动词从'说出'改回原文的'表达'，并将宾语从名词短语'语篇是表达意义的语言单位'调整为'表达'的宾语（即对'语篇'概念的解释）。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["表达"]}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘能表达语篇是表达意义的语言单位’是一句学科定义的陈述，不是对具体学生可观察能力的判断。掌握证据中‘用自己的话解释’和‘举例说明’同样无法判定一个具体孩子是否掌握，因为缺乏明确的行为标准和层级。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文‘语篇是表达意义的语言单位’是定义性陈述，而改写后的断言‘能表达语篇是表达意义的语言单位’主语不明确，且脱离了具体的、可观察的学生行为标准，无法直接用于判断学生能力。原句要求的是对语篇概念的理解，而非‘表达语篇’这一模糊行为。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"id": "ca_BZkEy9u7", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "语言知识", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能说出文化知识的学习更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观", "verb": "说出", "object": "文化知识的学习更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：文化知识的学习更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出文化知识的学习更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "文化知识的学习不限于了解和记忆具体的知识点，更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "文化理解，非通用概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 30, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.889, "facts": ["文化知识的学习不限于了解和记忆具体的知识点", "文化知识的学习更重要的是发现、判断其背后的态度和价值观"]}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_7Sn6ZC1l", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出听、读、看是理解性技能", "verb": "说出", "object": "听、读、看是理解性技能", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：听、读、看是理解性技能是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出听、读、看是理解性技能吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "听、读、看是理解性技能，说、写是表达性技能。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类陈述，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 32, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.909, "facts": ["听是理解性技能", "读是理解性技能", "看是理解性技能", "说是表达性技能", "写是表达性技能"]}}
{"id": "ca_r2lQxQtn", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出说、写是表达性技能", "verb": "说出", "object": "说、写是表达性技能", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：说、写是表达性技能是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出说、写是表达性技能吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "听、读、看是理解性技能，说、写是表达性技能。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "分类陈述，无跨学科思维或实践动作", "srcPage": 32, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.889, "facts": ["听是理解性技能", "读是理解性技能", "看是理解性技能", "说是表达性技能", "写是表达性技能"]}}
{"id": "ca_pIemEcJp", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出课外视听活动每周不少于30分钟", "verb": "说出", "object": "课外视听活动每周不少于30分钟", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：课外视听活动每周不少于30分钟是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出课外视听活动每周不少于30分钟吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "课外视听活动每周不少于30分钟；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述行为标准，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_62pUMgiR", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出课外阅读量累计达到4000~5000词", "verb": "说出", "object": "课外阅读量累计达到4000~5000词", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：课外阅读量累计达到4000~5000词是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出课外阅读量累计达到4000~5000词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "课外阅读量累计达到4000～5000词；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述阅读量，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_oWAtrBeq", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出课外阅读量累计达到15万词以上", "verb": "说出", "object": "课外阅读量累计达到15万词以上", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：课外阅读量累计达到15万词以上是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出课外阅读量累计达到15万词以上吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "课外阅读量累计达到15万词以上。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述阅读量，非思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "指标类（阅读量/速度/字数），是给学生定的目标不是可说的知识。这类由 mappings/stage-targets.json 那套机制承载。"}
{"id": "ca_0o5F9rdp", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出在词语与相应事物之间建立联系是认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在词语与相应事物之间建立联系是认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在词语与相应事物之间建立联系是认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在词语与相应事物之间建立联系是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在词语与相应事物之间建立联系；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述认知策略，非学科能力"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_vUz251QZ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出在新旧语言知识之间建立联系是认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在新旧语言知识之间建立联系是认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：在新旧语言知识之间建立联系是认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在新旧语言知识之间建立联系是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在新旧语言知识之间建立联系；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知陈述，非具体思维或动作", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.65, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_AfEuP717", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出通过分类等方法加深对词汇的理解和记忆是认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "通过分类等方法加深对词汇的理解和记忆是认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：通过分类等方法加深对词汇的理解和记忆是认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出通过分类等方法加深对词汇的理解和记忆是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "通过分类等方法加深对词汇的理解和记忆；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述认知策略，非学科能力锚点", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.692, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_vyVhd0St", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出积极运用所学英语进行表达和交流是认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "积极运用所学英语进行表达和交流是认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：积极运用所学英语进行表达和交流是认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出积极运用所学英语进行表达和交流是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "积极运用所学英语进行表达和交流；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述学习态度，非具体思维或动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "独立验证不通过 —— 没有标准答案：原文是「讨论/探讨」类活动，不是可判定的事实", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}}
{"id": "ca_B7ia6PVu", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能观察生活和媒体中使用的简单英语", "verb": "观察", "object": "生活和媒体中使用的简单英语", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生能在教室里找到并指出英语标识或标语", "学生能在观看英文动画片时，留意并模仿其中简单的问候语"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出注意观察生活和媒体中使用的简单英语是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "注意观察生活和媒体中使用的简单英语。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "观察语言使用，获取信息", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["investigating", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出注意观察生活和媒体中使用的简单英语是认知策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中的动词‘说出’替换为原文动词‘观察’，并移除了‘是认知策略’这一非能力描述，使断言回归为对学生具体行为的要求。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["观察"]}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘能观察生活和媒体中使用的简单英语’是教学活动描述，不是可判定的能力断言；掌握证据中的‘找到并指出’‘留意并模仿’是具体行为，但能力断言本身是口号式表述，无法直接判定一个孩子‘会/不会’"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "模型与可判定闸判断一致（无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS）→ 弃用。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}], "dropReason": "模型判「不可判定」，可判定闸也拦（无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS）。两个判官一致，不需要人。不硬拆 —— 拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_NNhnOpEZ", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能说出没听懂对方说的英语时会请对方说慢一些或再说一遍是交际策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "没听懂对方说的英语时会请对方说慢一些或再说一遍是交际策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：没听懂对方说的英语时会请对方说慢一些或再说一遍是交际策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出没听懂对方说的英语时会请对方说慢一些或再说一遍是交际策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "没听懂对方说的英语时，会请对方说慢一些或再说一遍；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言交际策略，非科学概念或实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.72, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_AgLGQtXa", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能在表达遇到困难时用简单的手势、指示代词等手段辅助表达", "verb": "表达", "object": "遇到困难时", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["学生在口语交流中遇到想不起来的词时，用手指着实物并说\"那个\"", "学生想描述一个位置但说不清楚时，用手指了指方向并说\"那里\""], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在表达遇到困难时用简单的手势、指示代词等手段辅助表达是交际策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在表达遇到困难时，用简单的手势、指示代词等手段辅助表达。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "用非语言手段辅助沟通", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.957, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出在表达遇到困难时用简单的手势、指示代词等手段辅助表达是交际策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中要求“说出”的知识性内容，改回课标原文要求的“表达”这一具体行为，并明确了在“遇到困难时”这一具体情境下的操作。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["表达"]}}
{"id": "ca_EJRB6ve4", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出有与同伴合作学习的愿望、乐于与他人共同完成学习任务是情感管理策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "有与同伴合作学习的愿望、乐于与他人共同完成学习任务是情感管理策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：有与同伴合作学习的愿望、乐于与他人共同完成学习任务是情感管理策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出有与同伴合作学习的愿望、乐于与他人共同完成学习任务是情感管理策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "有与同伴合作学习的愿望，乐于与他人共同完成学习任务。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "情感态度描述，非认知能力或实践动作", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第二学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.667, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_22ePEXgb", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "根据需要进行预习，对所学内容主动复习和归纳；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知策略属学习方法，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.679, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_D75ELQGv", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划，合理安排学习时间；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "学生需界定问题并设计方案", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.7, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_dsY0pQzz", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出主动利用图书馆和相关资源进行拓展学习是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "主动利用图书馆和相关资源进行拓展学习是元认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：主动利用图书馆和相关资源进行拓展学习是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出主动利用图书馆和相关资源进行拓展学习是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "主动利用图书馆和相关资源进行拓展学习；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并解释一种学习策略", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.667, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_k4b085U3", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出初步借助词典等简单的工具书学习英语是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "初步借助词典等简单的工具书学习英语是元认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：初步借助词典等简单的工具书学习英语是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出初步借助词典等简单的工具书学习英语是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "初步借助词典等简单的工具书学习英语；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知策略，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_ZIdiXTsX", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出主动了解英语学习方法、探索适合自己的学习方法是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "主动了解英语学习方法、探索适合自己的学习方法是元认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：主动了解英语学习方法、探索适合自己的学习方法是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出主动了解英语学习方法、探索适合自己的学习方法是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "主动了解英语学习方法，探索适合自己的学习方法；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知策略属学习策略，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.654, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_h830Lttq", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思，根据需要调整计划，遇到问题主动请教", "verb": "对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思，根据需要调整计划，遇到问题主动请教", "object": "学习过程和效果", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生能主动说出本次学习哪些部分掌握了，哪些部分需要改进", "学生能在遇到难题时，主动向老师或同学寻求帮助"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思、根据需要调整计划、遇到问题主动请教是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "llm-proposed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思，根据需要调整计划，遇到问题主动请教。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知与自我调节，涉及提问与调整方案", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思、根据需要调整计划、遇到问题主动请教是元认知策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文要求学生对学习过程和效果进行自我评价和反思，根据需要调整计划，遇到问题主动请教，这是可观察的行为动词短语。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}, "dropReason": "一条塞了三条要求（自我评价与反思／调整计划／主动请教），verb 字段还吞了整句 —— 去重签名 (verb, object) 因此形同虚设。不硬拆：拆句需要教学判断"}
{"id": "ca_Z614y40F", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务", "verb": "运用", "object": "已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生在完成一项新任务时，主动调用已学过的词汇和句型进行表达", "学生在解决一个新问题时，联系自己的生活经历来寻找答案"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务'，断言'能运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务'是忠实转述，且主语是学生。意见中提到的'无法判断'是对课标要求的误解，课标本身即作为教学目标提出，断言符合原文。", "quote": "运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言积累与经验迁移，非特定思维或实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出运用已有语言积累和生活经验完成新的学习任务是认知策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将断言中的名词性表述“说出…是认知策略”改回了原文的动词性表述“运用…完成新的学习任务”，并明确了对象和可观察的行为。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["运用"]}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是一句教学目标式的口号，无法对一个具体孩子判断‘会/不会’，因为‘已有语言积累’和‘生活经验’没有界定，任何孩子都可以声称自己在做这件事"}]}
{"id": "ca_RbY3Axbl", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容", "verb": "借助", "object": "图表、思维导图等工具", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["学生在学习后，能绘制思维导图来梳理单元知识点", "学生能使用表格对比归纳不同语法规则"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容'，这是对学生行为的要求，而非对教师的描述。能力断言'能借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容'是对课标原文的忠实转述。关于年级适用性的质疑，不在本次裁决范围内。", "quote": "借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容；", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "归纳整理信息，发现规律", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容是认知策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文要求学生『借助图表、思维导图等工具归纳、整理所学内容』，这是对学生学习行为的要求，属于程序性能力。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：该能力在G1（一年级）无法实现，一年级学生尚未具备英语系统学习和归纳整理的认知基础，G1–G9跨度不合理"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是对教学方法的描述（借助工具），而非学生的能力断言；学生能力应表述为'能归纳、整理所学内容'，工具是手段不是能力本身"}]}
{"id": "ca_Aenaf4ML", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出在学习内容与个人经历之间建立有意义的联系是认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在学习内容与个人经历之间建立有意义的联系是认知策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：在学习内容与个人经历之间建立有意义的联系是认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在学习内容与个人经历之间建立有意义的联系是认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在学习内容与个人经历之间建立有意义的联系；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述学习策略，非具体学科能力", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.714, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_vEjBSv5I", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出借助非语言信息线索理解他人表达的信息是交际策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "借助非语言信息线索理解他人表达的信息是交际策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：借助非语言信息线索理解他人表达的信息是交际策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出借助非语言信息线索理解他人表达的信息是交际策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "借助非语言信息线索理解他人表达的信息；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并解释交际策略", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.667, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_OwakCU0Y", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能运用各种学习和运用语言的实践活动，保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心", "verb": "运用", "object": "各种学习和运用语言的实践活动", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["在小组活动中，学生能主动提出并执行一个简单的英语角色扮演计划", "在项目学习中，学生能使用英语与同伴合作完成一份关于校园植物的图文报告"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心、主动参与各种学习和运用语言的实践活动是情感管理策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心’，这是对学生情感态度目标的要求。能力断言‘能运用各种学习和运用语言的实践活动，保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心’是对原文的忠实转述，且‘保持积极态度和自信心’在教学实践中可通过学生的参与度、坚持性等行为表现进行观察和判断。", "quote": "保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心，主动参与各种学习和运用语言的实践活动", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心，主动参与各种学习和运用语言的实践活动；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "情感态度目标，非认知能力锚点", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出保持对英语学习的积极态度和自信心、主动参与各种学习和运用语言的实践活动是情感管理策略", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "将「说出」改为原文动词「运用」，并调整宾语为「各种学习和运用语言的实践活动」，形成具体可观察的行为描述。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": ["运用"]}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是情感态度目标（保持积极态度和自信心），不是可观察、可判断的具体语言能力，无法对单个孩子答「会/不会」"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：证据描述的是活动参与表现（主动提出计划、合作完成报告），证明的是活动参与能力，无法证明「保持积极态度和自信心」这一情感状态"}]}
{"id": "ca_Qj8XukqC", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出主动与同学开展合作学习、乐于与他人分享学习资源和策略方法是情感管理策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "主动与同学开展合作学习、乐于与他人分享学习资源和策略方法是情感管理策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：主动与同学开展合作学习、乐于与他人分享学习资源和策略方法是情感管理策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出主动与同学开展合作学习、乐于与他人分享学习资源和策略方法是情感管理策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "主动与同学开展合作学习，乐于与他人分享学习资源和策略方法；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "情感态度描述，非学科能力", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.742, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_MBI0BGXL", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能说出遇到困难或取得进步时能有效调整自己的情绪是情感管理策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "遇到困难或取得进步时能有效调整自己的情绪是情感管理策略", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：遇到困难或取得进步时能有效调整自己的情绪是情感管理策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出遇到困难或取得进步时能有效调整自己的情绪是情感管理策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "遇到困难或取得进步时能有效调整自己的情绪。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "情绪管理策略，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.714, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_FtJHz5pg", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出提升学习效率和自控力的方法是合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间", "verb": "说出", "object": "提升学习效率和自控力的方法是合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：提升学习效率和自控力的方法是合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出提升学习效率和自控力的方法是合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "6. 合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间，提升学习效率和自控力；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "陈述性知识，非思维或实践", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.75, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_vVyFaxv7", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出丰富英语学习内容的方法是搜索并利用线上线下资源", "verb": "说出", "object": "丰富英语学习内容的方法是搜索并利用线上线下资源", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：丰富英语学习内容的方法是搜索并利用线上线下资源是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出丰富英语学习内容的方法是搜索并利用线上线下资源吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "7. 搜索并利用线上线下资源丰富自己的英语学习内容；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "界定问题并获取信息", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.76, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_J00980Na", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能与同学组成小组合作学习英语", "verb": "组成小组", "object": "小组", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["学生与同学组成3-5人小组", "学生在小组内用英语进行讨论或完成任务"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出合作学习英语的方式是经常和同学组成小组吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文第9条明确要求学生'经常和同学组成小组，合作学习英语'，这是对学生学习行为的要求。断言'能与同学组成小组合作学习英语'忠实转述了原文，主语是学生，且'能'对应了'经常'这一行为要求的达成。意见将'教学组织形式'与'能力'对立，但课标中对学生学习行为的要求本身就构成了可判定的能力点。", "quote": "9. 经常和同学组成小组，合作学习英语；", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "9. 经常和同学组成小组，合作学习英语；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "小组合作属于交流信息", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "statementBefore": "能说出合作学习英语的方式是经常和同学组成小组", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文『经常和同学组成小组』是要求学生执行的行为，用原文动词『组成』重写。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能与同学组成小组合作学习英语’是课堂教学组织形式（教学建议），而非可对具体学生判定‘会/不会’的学科能力。掌握证据‘学生与同学组成3-5人小组’描述的是活动步骤，不是能力表现。"}]}
{"id": "ca_Y3g6nM27", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出开展英语学习和交流的机会是课内外用英语沟通与交流", "verb": "说出", "object": "开展英语学习和交流的机会是课内外用英语沟通与交流", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：开展英语学习和交流的机会是课内外用英语沟通与交流是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出开展英语学习和交流的机会是课内外用英语沟通与交流吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "10. 善于抓住课内外用英语沟通与交流的机会开展学习和交流。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类陈述，无思维与实践动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "独立验证不通过 —— 没有标准答案：原文是「讨论/探讨」类活动，不是可判定的事实", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}}
{"id": "ca_lzRk6CD5", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出增强理解和记忆的方法是利用不同感官", "verb": "说出", "object": "增强理解和记忆的方法是利用不同感官", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：增强理解和记忆的方法是利用不同感官是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出增强理解和记忆的方法是利用不同感官吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "2. 在学习中利用不同感官增强理解和记忆；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "陈述性知识，无跨学科思维或实践动作", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.65, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_Gft5XvMz", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出整理、归纳所学内容的目的是把握重点和难点", "verb": "说出", "object": "整理、归纳所学内容的目的是把握重点和难点", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：整理、归纳所学内容的目的是把握重点和难点是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出整理、归纳所学内容的目的是把握重点和难点吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "4. 整理、归纳所学内容，把握重点和难点；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "说明整理归纳的目的"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "dropReason": "改写凭空造出「X的作用/目的是Y」这类关系，原文没有这个判断。接地校验查不出来 —— 编的是关系不是词，字面覆盖率照样很高。"}
{"id": "ca_4wLMEvXn", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能说出理解主题的方法是利用信息结构图等", "verb": "说出", "object": "理解主题的方法是利用信息结构图等", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：理解主题的方法是利用信息结构图等是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出理解主题的方法是利用信息结构图等吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "5. 在学习中善于利用信息结构图等理解主题；", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "说明理解主题的方法", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.632, "facts": []}, "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index"}
{"id": "ca_4yaUp7J1", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能说出词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练", "verb": "说出", "object": "词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "要让学生认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "认知观念，非具体学科能力", "srcPage": 46, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.842, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_DOHqbV1e", "discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出语篇知识的作用是有效获取和传递信息，表达观点和态度", "verb": "说出", "object": "语篇知识的作用是有效获取和传递信息，表达观点和态度", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：语篇知识的作用是有效获取和传递信息，表达观点和态度是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出语篇知识的作用是有效获取和传递信息，表达观点和态度吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "引导学生充分利用语篇知识有效获取和传递信息，表达观点和态度。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "理解结构功能与系统作用，建构解释"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function", "systems"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "dropReason": "改写凭空造出「X的作用/目的是Y」这类关系，原文没有这个判断。接地校验查不出来 —— 编的是关系不是词，字面覆盖率照样很高。"}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["看到 China 能说出 Chinese", "能区分国家名与国民/语言名的写法"], "assessment": "{{name}}看到 China 能说出 Chinese 吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 138, "srcPageRange": "138–138", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 36, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类内容，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "splitFrom": "ca_lbiHj20K"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_nVsMUWv6", "statement": "能说出常见国家、地区名称的英文表达", "verb": "说出", "object": "常见国家、地区名称的英文表达", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["看到 China 能说出 Chinese", "能区分国家名与国民/语言名的写法"], "assessment": "给{{name}}一个国家名，他能说出对应的国民和语言怎么说吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 138, "srcPageRange": "138–138", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 36, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类内容，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "splitFrom": "ca_lbiHj20K"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_f2um2zYH", "statement": "能说出常见国家、地区名称对应的国民的英文表达", "verb": "说出", "object": "常见国家、地区名称对应的国民的英文表达", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["看到 China 能说出 Chinese", "能区分国家名与国民/语言名的写法"], "assessment": "给{{name}}一个国家名，他能说出对应的国民和语言怎么说吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 138, "srcPageRange": "138–138", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 36, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类内容，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "splitFrom": "ca_lbiHj20K"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_rPqr6AWu", "statement": "能说出常见国家、地区名称对应的语言的英文表达", "verb": "说出", "object": "常见国家、地区名称对应的语言的英文表达", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只覆盖了最基础的'国家名对应语言名'，但能力断言包含'国家、地区名称'，证据中未体现对地区（如Asia, North America）或更多国家（如Japan-Japanese）的掌握要求"}]}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["给出动词原形能写出过去式与过去分词", "能识别 cost/cut 这类三态同形的动词"], "assessment": "给{{name}}报动词原形，他能写出过去式和过去分词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 140, "srcPageRange": "140–144", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 106, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "语言记忆与规则应用，非跨学科思维", "splitFrom": "ca_LARmngwc"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_dpJmntWK", "statement": "能说出英语不规则动词的过去式", "verb": "说出", "object": "英语不规则动词的过去式", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["给出动词原形能写出过去式与过去分词", "能识别 cost/cut 这类三态同形的动词"], "assessment": "给{{name}}报动词原形，他能写出过去式和过去分词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 140, "srcPageRange": "140–144", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 106, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "语言记忆与规则应用，非跨学科思维", "splitFrom": "ca_LARmngwc"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_seWjznCw", "statement": "能说出英语不规则动词的过去分词", "verb": "说出", "object": "英语不规则动词的过去分词", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["给出动词原形能写出过去式与过去分词", "能识别 cost/cut 这类三态同形的动词"], "assessment": "给{{name}}报动词原形，他能写出过去式和过去分词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 140, "srcPageRange": "140–144", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 106, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "语言记忆与规则应用，非跨学科思维", "splitFrom": "ca_LARmngwc"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_LaGqyHdD", "statement": "能写出英语不规则动词的过去式", "verb": "写出", "object": "英语不规则动词的过去式", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "语言知识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "LANGUAGE", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["给出动词原形能写出过去式与过去分词", "能识别 cost/cut 这类三态同形的动词"], "assessment": "给{{name}}报动词原形，他能写出过去式和过去分词吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-appendix", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 140, "srcPageRange": "140–144", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "itemCount": 106, "declaredCount": null, "crosscuttingWhy": "语言记忆与规则应用，非跨学科思维", "splitFrom": "ca_LARmngwc"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_uTNveYfj", "statement": "能写出英语不规则动词的过去分词", "verb": "写出", "object": "英语不规则动词的过去分词", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能准确复述教师读出的英文句子并模仿其升降调", "能在跟读录音时区分并再现角色对话中的不同语气"], "assessment": "您可以问{{name}}：刚才妈妈读的那句话哪里要升高声音，哪里要降低声音？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-6 在跟读简短的音视频材料时，能模仿说话者的语音、语调。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语音模仿属技能训练", "splitFrom": "ca_R92qHDfg"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_yzCGGdUV", "statement": "能模仿说话者的语音", "verb": "模仿", "object": "说话者的语音", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能准确复述教师读出的英文句子并模仿其升降调", "能在跟读录音时区分并再现角色对话中的不同语气"], "assessment": "您可以问{{name}}：刚才妈妈读的那句话哪里要升高声音，哪里要降低声音？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 50, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.91", "srcText": "1-6 在跟读简短的音视频材料时，能模仿说话者的语音、语调。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语音模仿属技能训练", "splitFrom": "ca_R92qHDfg"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_aEQNyH9N", "statement": "能模仿说话者的语调", "verb": "模仿", "object": "说话者的语调", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语向同学介绍中西方节日（如春节与圣诞节）的至少两个不同习俗", "能用英语描述中西方日常问候方式（如握手与拥抱）的差异并简单说明原因"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语说说中外过节时最不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化现象和文化差异；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述文化现象需解释与交流", "splitFrom": "ca_jfH499CK"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "id": "ca_7uacrxQc", "statement": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化现象", "verb": "描述", "object": "熟悉的文化现象", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "LIST", "strand": "文化意识", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力", "文化意识"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用英语向同学介绍中西方节日（如春节与圣诞节）的至少两个不同习俗", "能用英语描述中西方日常问候方式（如握手与拥抱）的差异并简单说明原因"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用英语说说中外过节时最不一样的地方吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 90, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化现象和文化差异；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述文化现象需解释与交流", "splitFrom": "ca_jfH499CK"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "id": "ca_dubSdyLz", "statement": "能基于已有经验和知识，用所学英语描述熟悉的文化差异", "verb": "描述", "object": "熟悉的文化差异", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "根据需要进行预习，对所学内容主动复习和归纳；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知策略属学习方法，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_22ePEXgb"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_E7BKyBxz", "statement": "能说出根据需要进行预习是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "根据需要进行预习是元认知策略", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这条断言描述的是对元认知策略的概念定义（‘是元认知策略’），而非学生在语言实践中‘能做到’的具体能力。掌握证据也仅要求复述课标原文，属于知识记忆，不是语言运用能力。"}, {"type": "undecidable", "detail": "这是一个关于学习策略的定义性陈述，无法用来判断一个具体学生在实际英语学习或交际中是否‘会’使用预习、复习等策略。它更接近教学目标或教师知识。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文是‘根据需要进行预习，对所学内容主动复习和归纳’，这是一个行为要求，但断言将其改写为‘能说出根据需要进行预习是元认知策略’。这改变了原意：原文要求学生‘进行预习’（行动），而断言要求学生‘能说出…是元认知策略’（对策略的定义性知识）。这属于将行为要求偷换为概念定义，且主语从‘学生应做’变成了‘学生能说出定义’，后者并非原文要求。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：根据需要进行预习、对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "根据需要进行预习，对所学内容主动复习和归纳；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "元认知策略属学习方法，非跨学科概念或科学实践", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_22ePEXgb", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第三学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_rpCjJJ6a", "statement": "能说出对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是一条知识性定义复述（答出即为会），不是可观察的英语能力；无法判断一个孩子是否'会'元认知策略。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'元认知策略'的定义复述属于认知心理学概念，不是英语学科语言能力。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据仅要求复述课标原文，证明的是记忆定义，而非英语运用能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'对所学内容主动复习和归纳'，断言'能说出对所学内容主动复习和归纳是元认知策略'是对这一要求的忠实转述，且'能说出'是可观察的行为。", "quote": "对所学内容主动复习和归纳", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划，合理安排学习时间；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "学生需界定问题并设计方案", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_D75ELQGv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "id": "ca_iUR3Zmvw", "statement": "能说出在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划是元认知策略", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是对元认知策略的定义描述，不是学生能力。学生能力应是'能制订简单的学习计划'，而非'能说出...是元认知策略'。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文是'在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划，合理安排学习时间'，这是一个行为要求，主语是学生。改写后的断言'能说出在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划是元认知策略'将行为要求变成了对策略的定义性陈述，这超出了原文的要求。原文并未要求学生能说出或识别这是元认知策略。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划、合理安排学习时间是元认知策略是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出合理安排学习时间是元认知策略吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcText": "在教师指导下制订简单的学习计划，合理安排学习时间；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "学生需界定问题并设计方案", "srcPage": 39, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_D75ELQGv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "explaining-designing"], "id": "ca_4aQrwvZ7", "statement": "能说出合理安排学习时间是元认知策略", "verb": "说出", "object": "合理安排学习时间是元认知策略", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是对元认知策略的定义性知识，不是学生能展示的可观察行为能力；掌握证据要求复述课标原文，属于知识记忆而非能力表现"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文的主语是学生（隐含），但原文要求的是学生‘制订计划、安排时间’的行为，而改写后的断言‘能说出合理安排学习时间是元认知策略’变成了对元认知策略的定义性知识，这偏离了原文对学生行为能力的要求。意见成立，因为断言确实将行为能力要求转换成了定义性知识记忆。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "普通高中英语课程语法知识", "topic": "普通高中英语课程语法知识", "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": "必修", "evidence": ["能结合阅读材料，用两三句话说出自己对文中人物或事件的真实感受。", "能就课文话题与同学进行简短对话，表达赞同、反对或疑问。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能表达情感态度，进行人际交流吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "2", "srcTopic": "普通高中英语课程语法知识", "srcCourse": "必修", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "运用所学的语法知识，理解所学语篇的基本意义和深层意义，恰当地描述真实和想象世界中的人和物、情景和事件，表达观点、意图和情感态度，进行人际交流；", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "核心是人际交流与信息传递", "splitFrom": "ca_tEkSpesq"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_jPvTF2xU", "statement": "能表达情感态度，进行人际交流", "verb": "表达", "object": "情感态度，进行人际交流", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这条断言是教学目标而非可检测的个体能力，'能表达情感态度，进行人际交流'是一句笼统的课程目标，无法直接用于判断一个具体学生'会/不会'。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。原文是'恰当地描述真实和想象世界中的人和物、情景和事件，表达观点、意图和情感态度，进行人际交流'，这是一个整体性的教学目标描述，主语是隐含的'学生'在'运用所学的语法知识'这一前提下应达到的综合结果。改写后的断言'能表达情感态度，进行人际交流'虽然源自原文，但将其从完整的语境（运用语法知识理解语篇并描述、表达、交流）中孤立出来，变成了一条独立的、笼统的能力要（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能听读一个新句子后，说出里面哪个词在什么位置，起到什么作用", "能对比两个句子，指出其中一个词或语序变了，导致意思或用法有什么不同"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出一个句子的结构、意思和使用场景吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns", "structure-function"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_9Dx2feL0", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将语法知识的三个维度作为分析对象，对一个具体的语法结构进行可观察的特征描述和归类。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "在语言使用中，语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语法形式-意义-使用的规律与结构功能", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_xkDNtkD2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_4b7t8N9A", "statement": "能识别并说出一个语法结构在形式方面的特征", "verb": "说出", "object": "一个语法结构在形式方面的特征", "reviewedBy": [], "evidenceDrafted": true}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能指出一个句子中某个语法结构，并说出它让句子意思发生了什么变化。", "能对比两个句子，说出其中一个语法结构的改变如何影响了句子的意义。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出一个句子的结构、意思和使用场景吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns", "structure-function"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_9Dx2feL0", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将语法知识的三个维度作为分析对象，对一个具体的语法结构进行可观察的特征描述和归类。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "在语言使用中，语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语法形式-意义-使用的规律与结构功能", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_xkDNtkD2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_FbthKzeE", "statement": "能识别并说出一个语法结构在意义方面的特征", "verb": "说出", "object": "一个语法结构在意义方面的特征", "reviewedBy": [], "evidenceDrafted": true, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：标注学段 G1–G9 过宽。'识别并说出语法结构在意义方面的特征' 是语法分析能力，G1（一年级）学生刚接触英语，无法理解抽象的语法结构及其意义变化，此能力至少应从 G3（三年级）或更高年级开始标注。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：该能力断言过于宽泛，未指定任何具体的语法结构（如时态、语态、从句等）。对一个一年级学生，无法用这条断言回答'会/不会'，因为它没有边界。它更像一个贯穿多年的课程目标或教学话题，而非一个可评估的具体能力点。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：该表述更像一个教学目标或语法教学的核心要求（'识别并说出特征'），而非学生可直接观察和评估的具体行为。掌握证据（指出、对比、说出变化）描述的是教学活动或评估任务，而非能力本身。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：给出的掌握证据是教学活动或任务描述（'指出一个句子...'，'对比两个句子...'），它们描述了如何评估或教授此能力，但并未提供能证明学生'掌握'该能力的具体标准或表现指标。例如，未说明需要识别多少种结构、达到何种准确性或流利度。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确将语法知识定义为“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，这意味着学生需要理解语法结构的意义方面。断言“能识别并说出一个语法结构在意义方面的特征”是对这一要求的忠实转述，是学生应具备的能力。", "quote": "在语言使用中，语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能针对一个语法结构，说出它在具体语境中为什么这样用、而不那样用。", "能在一段话里，辨认出某个语法结构的使用特征，并说明其在表达效果上的作用。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出一个句子的结构、意思和使用场景吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns", "structure-function"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_9Dx2feL0", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将语法知识的三个维度作为分析对象，对一个具体的语法结构进行可观察的特征描述和归类。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "在语言使用中，语法知识是“形式—意义—使用”的统一体，", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语法形式-意义-使用的规律与结构功能", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_xkDNtkD2"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_jniyBMhr", "statement": "能识别并说出一个语法结构在使用方面的特征", "verb": "说出", "object": "一个语法结构在使用方面的特征", "reviewedBy": [], "evidenceDrafted": true}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能说出两种具体的时间管理方法，如番茄工作法、四象限法则，并解释其操作步骤。", "能针对一个具体任务（如周末作业），说出如何用其中一种方法来安排完成顺序和时间。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出至少两种合理规划时间的具体方法吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["cause-effect", "systems"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_FtJHz5pg", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将‘合理规划时间提升效率’这一知识，转化为可观察的、能具体阐述方法及其作用的行为。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 40, "srcText": "6. 合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间，提升学习效率和自控力；", "crosscuttingWhy": "解释方法如何提升效率，涉及因果与系统规划", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_7AbztAgh", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "id": "ca_bFrwiqQv", "statement": "能说出至少两种合理规划时间的具体方法", "verb": "说出", "object": "至少两种合理规划时间的具体方法", "reviewedBy": [], "evidenceDrafted": true, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是通用学习策略或生活技能，不是英语学科能力，英语课标中不应包含此类跨学科通用能力"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生具备‘合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间’的能力，这是对学生学习行为的要求，属于英语学科核心素养中‘学习能力’的组成部分。断言‘能说出至少两种合理规划时间的具体方法’是对该要求的合理、可观察的转述。", "quote": "合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间，提升学习效率和自控力", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能列举出‘制定每日学习计划表’和‘使用番茄工作法’两种方法，并说明前者帮助明确任务优先级，后者帮助保持专注", "学生能解释‘将大任务分解为小步骤’这一方法如何通过减少拖延来提升效率"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出制定每日学习计划表和使用番茄工作法这两种方法，分别怎么帮助提升学习效率吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["cause-effect", "systems"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_FtJHz5pg", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将‘合理规划时间提升效率’这一知识，转化为可观察的、能具体阐述方法及其作用的行为。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 40, "srcText": "6. 合理规划、分配、利用和管理时间，提升学习效率和自控力；", "crosscuttingWhy": "解释方法如何提升效率，涉及因果与系统规划", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_7AbztAgh", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9", "srcStage": "第四学段"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "topicFrom": "curriculum-page-index", "id": "ca_8nj8xC9P", "statement": "能解释具体方法如何提升学习效率", "verb": "解释", "object": "具体方法如何提升学习效率", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生在阅读中遇到生词时，能说出‘我可以通过上下文猜这个词的意思’。", "学生在分析单词时，能说出‘我可以通过词根un-知道这个单词是否定的意思’。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能举出两个例子，说明自己怎么通过上下文或词根来猜单词意思吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns", "cause-effect"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_4yaUp7J1", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生从‘知道词汇学习不只是死记硬背’上升到‘能说出或演示具体的、非机械操练的词汇学习方法’。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 46, "srcText": "要让学生认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别构词规律并解释学习机制", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_Bdn9TZpa"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_WX73T4nb", "statement": "能举出两个具体例子，说明词汇学习可以通过语境猜测进行", "verb": "说明", "object": "词汇学习可以通过语境猜测进行", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：能力断言要求学生能举出两个具体例子，但掌握证据只要求学生说出策略名称（如'我可以通过上下文猜'），并未要求学生实际举出例子。证据与断言不匹配。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据中的第二个例子（通过词根un-猜测）属于构词法知识，而非断言所要求的'通过语境猜测'，证据偏离了能力描述的核心。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练’。能力断言‘能举出两个具体例子，说明词汇学习可以通过语境猜测进行’是对这一要求的合理、具体化转述，旨在让学生通过实例来‘认识’到词汇学习的多样性和非机械性。断言的主语是学生，且要求的行为（举出例子）是可观察的，符合能力描述。意见中关于证据与断言不匹配的质疑，是基于对‘掌握证据’的具体要求，而非对断言本身是否忠实于课标的判断。", "quote": "要让学生认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "英语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学科内容", "topic": null, "dimension": "学习能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生在阅读中遇到生词时，能说出‘我可以通过上下文猜这个词的意思’。", "学生在分析单词时，能说出‘我可以通过词根un-知道这个单词是否定的意思’。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能举出两个例子，说明自己怎么通过上下文或词根来猜单词意思吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns", "cause-effect"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_4yaUp7J1", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生从‘知道词汇学习不只是死记硬背’上升到‘能说出或演示具体的、非机械操练的词汇学习方法’。", "srcSubject": "英语", "srcPage": 46, "srcText": "要让学生认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别构词规律并解释学习机制", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_Bdn9TZpa"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_875qvGfw", "statement": "能举出两个具体例子，说明词汇学习可以通过词根分析进行", "verb": "说明", "object": "词汇学习可以通过词根分析进行", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：能力断言要求学生‘举出两个具体例子’，这是教学活动或任务要求，而非可判断‘会/不会’的学生能力。能力应表述为‘能通过词根分析理解生词含义’。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据中‘能说出我可以通过上下文猜这个词的意思’与能力断言‘通过词根分析’不匹配，证据未能证明词根分析能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘认识到’词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。能力断言‘能举出两个具体例子，说明词汇学习可以通过词根分析进行’是学生‘认识到’这一点的具体表现和可观察行为，是忠实于原文要求的。意见中关于‘教学活动’和‘证据不匹配’的判断，是基于对课标原文的误解。", "quote": "要让学生认识到词汇学习不是单纯的词汇记忆和机械的操练。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}