{"id": "ca_Py3L8gjE", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学习策略", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能积极与教师、同学交流学习的体会和经验，汲取有效学习方法", "verb": "交流", "object": "学习的体会和经验，汲取有效学习方法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能主动向老师请教一个自己没弄懂的问题，并说出自己尝试过的方法", "能在小组讨论时，分享自己觉得好用的一个学习小技巧，并说明它好在哪里"], "assessment": "{{name}}能积极和老师、同学交流日语学习的体会和经验，学习有效的方法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 25, "srcCode": "2", "srcTopic": "学习策略", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "积极与教师、同学交流学习的体会和经验，汲取有效学习方法。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "交流学习体会属于信息交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：这是教学建议或学习态度要求，不是可观察、可判断的具体能力。无法对一个具体孩子答「会/不会」。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供任何可观察的行为或成果作为判断依据。 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生“积极与教师、同学交流学习的体会和经验，汲取有效学习方法”，这是对学生学习行为的具体要求，改写后的断言忠实于原文，且“能积极交流”是可观察、可判断的具体能力。", "quote": "积极与教师、同学交流学习的体会和经验，汲取有效学习方法。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_98N4y888", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学习策略", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能在学习活动中积极与同学协调、配合、合作", "verb": "配合", "object": "合作", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["小组合作任务中，能主动找到同伴商量分工，并明确说出自己负责的部分。", "在小组讨论遇到分歧时，能提出折中方案或发起投票来协调意见。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业中积极跟同学协调配合吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 25, "srcCode": "3", "srcTopic": "学习策略", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "在学习活动中积极与同学协调、配合、合作。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "社会性技能，非学科思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：能力描述为‘积极与同学协调、配合、合作’，属于态度或行为倾向，无法客观判断一个具体学生‘会/不会’，更像教学建议或课程目标"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘在学习活动中积极与同学协调、配合、合作’，能力断言‘能在学习活动中积极与同学协调、配合、合作’是对此的忠实转述，描述的是学生应具备的可观察行为。", "quote": "在学习活动中积极与同学协调、配合、合作。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_n8FxP4rK", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学习策略", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能主动拓宽日语学习的途径，把握和创造学习、运用日语的机会", "verb": "运用", "object": "日语的机会", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能说出自己最近通过哪些课外渠道（如动漫、歌曲、社交平台）主动接触日语，并举出一个具体例子。", "能描述自己如何主动寻找或创造使用日语的机会，例如主动与日语母语者交流或参加相关活动。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能主动拓宽日语学习的途径，把握和创造学习、运用日语的机会吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 25, "srcCode": "4", "srcTopic": "学习策略", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "主动拓宽日语学习的途径，把握和创造学习、运用日语的机会。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言学习习惯，非学科思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能主动拓宽日语学习的途径，把握和创造学习、运用日语的机会’是一句口号式的目标描述，无法对一个具体孩子判断‘会/不会’。掌握证据只是重复了断言本身，没有提供可观察、可验证的行为指标。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘主动拓宽…，把握和创造…’，断言是忠实转述。意见认为口号式描述无法判定，但这属于对课标要求本身的质疑，而非对断言忠实性的质疑。断言作为可观察的行为目标，应予保留。", "quote": "主动拓宽日语学习的途径，把握和创造学习、运用日语的机会。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_Yw8kqwwU", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学习策略", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能在交际中注意选择对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式", "verb": "表达", "object": "和行为方式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["和年纪小的孩子说话时，能主动用短句和常见词，不用对方没听过的复杂词语", "给家长讲学校的事时，会按大人的理解习惯，先说结果再说原因，不直接堆细节"], "assessment": "{{name}}在日语课堂或作业中，能注意选择对方容易理解的语言和行为方式吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 25, "srcCode": "3", "srcTopic": "学习策略", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "在交际中注意选择对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言交际能力，非科学思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.958, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ZRLGrxud", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "学习策略", "topic": "学习策略", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能关注交际中语言运用是否得体，根据需要做相应的调整", "verb": "运用", "object": "是否得体，根据需要做相应的调整", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能根据对话对象（如长辈、同学）调整称呼和语气", "能识别出一段话中不得体的表达并说明如何修改更合适"], "assessment": "{{name}}在日语课堂或作业中，能注意说话得不得体并根据情况调整吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 25, "srcCode": "4", "srcTopic": "学习策略", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "关注交际中语言运用是否得体，根据需要做相应的调整。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言得体性判断，非通用概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.958, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_HABgDACF", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能通过预测、推断等学习策略，大体把握语篇的内容", "verb": "推断", "object": "等学习策略，大体把握语篇的内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读完一篇新文章前，能根据标题和首段预测后文可能讲什么", "读完后能说出文章主要讲了哪几个方面，举出其中一点的具体内容"], "assessment": "{{name}}能通过预测、推断等学习策略，大体把握日语语篇的内容吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 26, "srcCode": "4.1.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "根据语篇中的标题、语句、图表、图像等提取所需信息；通过预测、推断等学习策略，大体把握语篇的内容。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用策略分析语篇并建构理解"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.952, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_tABEt2hZ", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能运用已有知识，表述自己的所见所闻", "verb": "运用", "object": "已有知识，表述自己的所见所闻", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能根据一段短文，用自己的话概括出文章讲了哪几件事。", "能就一个熟悉的话题，说出自己最近看到或经历过的一件事。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课上用学过的知识说说看到或听到的事情吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 26, "srcCode": "4.2.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "根据语篇的信息和内容做简要概述；就非常熟悉的主题，运用已有知识，表述自己的所见所闻。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用已有知识表述所见所闻"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.933, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_ZwnXCDD9", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能通过把握语篇中的关键词句等提取所需信息", "verb": "提取", "object": "所需信息", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给一篇短文，能圈出回答问题所需的关键句，并据此说出答案", "读一段材料后，能准确摘录出文中直接提到的某个事实或观点"], "assessment": "{{name}}能通过把握日语语篇中的关键词句来提取所需信息吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "5.1.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "通过把握语篇中的关键词句等提取所需信息；通过预测、推断等学习策略，了解语篇内容，理解主要意义。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇提取信息并交流"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.95, "facts": ["通过把握语篇中的关键词句等提取所需信息", "通过预测、推断等学习策略了解语篇内容", "通过预测、推断等学习策略理解主要意义"]}}
{"id": "ca_mEka3xwJ", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "学习能力", "statement": "能通过预测、推断等学习策略", "verb": "推断", "object": "等学习策略", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["学习能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读到标题或插图时，能说出自己对文章内容的猜测，并在读后验证对不对。", "面对有线索的段落，能根据前文推断出下文大概要讲什么，并解释推理依据。"], "assessment": "{{name}}在日语课堂或作业中，能通过预测、推断等学习策略来学习吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions", "analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "5.1.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "通过把握语篇中的关键词句等提取所需信息；通过预测、推断等学习策略，了解语篇内容，理解主要意义。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "运用策略进行预测推断", "longerSibling": "ca_HABgDACF"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能通过预测、推断等学习策略'是策略名称，不是可判断的具体能力。无法对一个孩子答'会/不会'。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：句子缺宾语，'能通过预测、推断等学习策略'做什么？是'理解语篇'还是'解决问题'？主干不完整。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：掌握证据'能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过预测、推断等学习策略'与能力断言完全相同，是同义反复，没有提供任何可观察的证明。 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'通过预测、推断等学习策略'来达成学习目标，断言'能通过预测、推断等学习策略'是对此要求的忠实转述，且'能通过...'本身描述了一种可观察的学习行为能力。", "quote": "通过预测、推断等学习策略，了解语篇内容，理解主要意义。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}, "fieldIssues": ["possible-truncation"]}
{"id": "ca_vFE3CjjT", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能根据语篇中的重复、解释、停顿等理解话语意义", "verb": "解释", "object": "停顿等理解话语意义", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["听一段有重复或解释的口语材料后，能说出说话人想强调的意思", "遇到没听清的句子，能根据上下文或说话人的解释猜出大意"], "assessment": "{{name}}能根据日语语篇中的重复、解释、停顿等理解话语意义吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "5.1.4", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "根据语篇中的重复、解释、停顿等理解话语意义。五级 表达", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语篇中的重复、解释等模式以理解意义"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.944, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_YuUJz9v6", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的基本要义", "verb": "概述", "object": "语篇的基本要义", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["听完一篇故事后，能说出故事讲了谁、发生了什么事。", "读完一篇短文后，能用一两句话告诉大家这篇文章主要说了什么。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的基本要义吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "5.2.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的基本要义；就熟悉的主题，运用已有知识，表述自己的所见所闻。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇信息并概述要义"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.944, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_xTBBX3Ju", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能通过把握语篇中的关键概念和细节提取所需信息，通过预测、推断等学习策略", "verb": "提取", "object": "所需信息，通过预测、推断等学习策略", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读完一篇短文后，能说出文章主要讲了什么，并指出支持这个结论的关键句子。", "读到一半时，能根据已有信息猜出下文大概会写什么，并说明理由。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能通过把握语篇中的关键概念和细节，提取出需要的信息吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "6.1.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "通过把握语篇中的关键概念和细节提取所需信息，通过预测、推断等学习策略，理解语篇的核心内容。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇信息并建构解释"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：断言内容是‘通过预测、推断等学习策略’，这是一个教学方法或策略的泛称，而非一个可观察、可判断的具体学生能力。它没有描述学生能做什么具体的产出或行为。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：断言句子不完整，缺少主干谓语。它以‘通过……’开头，但未说明学生用这些策略做什么（例如：‘能完成阅读理解任务’）。掌握证据部分与断言内容几乎完全相同，只是增加了‘能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成’，这并未补充一个具体的能力行为。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：掌握证据‘能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过把握语篇中的关键概念和细节提取所需信息，通过预测、推断等学习策略’与能力断言高度同义，只是添加了情境限定，并未提供新的、具体的、可验证 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确将‘通过预测、推断等学习策略’作为学生应掌握的、用于‘理解语篇核心内容’的能力路径。意见认为这只是教学方法泛称，忽略了课标将其作为学生学习策略能力的一部分来要求。断言虽截取自原文，但并非残句，而是对课标要求的忠实转述，学生需要掌握并运用这些策略。", "quote": "通过预测、推断等学习策略，理解语篇的核心内容", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_PsAe8EY2", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能把握语篇中的语境和相应的支撑论据", "verb": "支撑", "object": "论据", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能读完一篇议论文后，指出作者的核心观点，并找出文中支撑该观点的一处论据", "能就所给语篇说明某处论据与观点之间的关联，指出二者构成支撑关系"], "assessment": "{{name}}能把握日语语篇中的语境和相应的支撑论据吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "argumentation"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "6.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "把握语篇中的语境和相应的支撑论据，理解语篇中内在的逻辑关系。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语境与论据关系"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是把能力断言复述了一遍，没有提供任何可观察的行为标准或评估方式，无法证明学生是否真的‘能把握’"}], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.933, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_dMj4xEAm", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言技能内容分级", "topic": "语言技能内容分级", "dimension": "思维品质", "statement": "能根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的核心内容", "verb": "概述", "object": "语篇的核心内容", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["思维品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给一篇新文章，能用一两句话说出它的主要内容", "读完一个不太熟悉话题的段落，能说清里面讲了什么事或什么观点"], "assessment": "{{name}}能根据日语语篇的信息和内容，简要概述它的核心内容吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["analyzing-data", "communicating"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcCode": "6.2.1", "srcTopic": "语言技能内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的核心内容；就不太熟悉的主题，运用已有知识，表述自己的所见所闻。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析语篇信息并概括核心内容"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的核心内容' 与前置能力几乎同义反复，未提供具体可观察的行为标准，无法判断具体学生是否掌握"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的核心内容’，该断言是对此要求的忠实转述，且‘简要概述’是可观察的行为标准。", "quote": "根据语篇的信息和内容，简要概述语篇的核心内容", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_9ARCrnE9", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式", "verb": "运用", "object": "动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用 Vている 描述图片里人物正在做的事，用 Vてある 描述桌上已备好的物品。", "能根据情景选择 Vておく 表达为将来做准备，如把伞放在门口的动作。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在作业或课堂练习里用对Vている、Vてある、Vておく这些说法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科通用概念"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.929, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_3wzeBFwM", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用被动态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）", "verb": "运用", "object": "被动态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就给定的一段主动句，逐句改写成被动态，助词与词尾变形均正确", "能在一组含れる・られる的句子中，指出哪些是被动态并说出判断依据"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解并运用日语被动态（Vれる・Vられる）的基本语法形式吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.3", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用被动态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供可观察、可判断的具体行为表现（如‘能在句子中正确使用被动态描述客观事实’）"}], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.938, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_xptFJsts", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用可能态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）", "verb": "运用", "object": "可能态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给出含有「れる/られる」的句子，能说出动词的可能态原形是什么", "想表达「我能做某事」时，能主动把动词改成可能态来造句"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业里，用可能态（Vれる・Vられる）完成练习吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.4", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用可能态的基本语法形式（Vれる・Vられる）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，不涉及跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_Q8Up8vHT", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用授受表达方式（Vてくれる 、Vてあげる 、Vてもらう ）等语法形式", "verb": "表达", "object": "方式（Vてくれる 、Vてあげる 、Vてもらう ）等语法形式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用「Vてあげる」描述自己为他人做的事，用「Vてくれる」描述他人为自己做的事", "能根据情境选择正确的授受动词，完成句子填空或对话补全"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业中正确使用Vてくれる、Vてあげる、Vてもらう这些授受表达方式吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.5", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用授受表达方式（Vてくれる 、Vてあげる 、Vてもらう ）等语法形式。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科通用概念"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能理解与运用授受表达方式'是教学目标描述，不是对一个具体孩子能否答出或做出的具体能力断言，无法据其判断某个孩子'会不会'。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，是同义反复，没有提供任何可观察、可验证的掌握证据。 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能理解与运用...'中'完成'后接动词短语不自然，疑似从更复杂的任务描述中截断。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'理解与运用'相关语法形式，能力断言是对这一要求的忠实转述，主语是学生，表述完整。意见未考虑课标原文，因此不成立。", "quote": "理解与运用授受表达方式（Vてくれる 、Vてあげる 、Vてもらう ）等语法形式。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_2Zu2uF7s", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用表示意志（つもり） 、许可（Vてもいい ）的基本表达方式", "verb": "表达", "object": "方式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用「つもり」造出描述自己未来计划的句子，如「明日は早く起きるつもりです」", "能判断给出的对话中，哪句表示请求许可（Vてもいい），哪句表示拒绝"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解并使用表示意志的「つもり」和表示许可的「Vてもいい」吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.6", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用表示意志（つもり） 、许可（Vてもいい ）的基本表达方式。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言规则记忆与运用，非跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据是‘能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能理解与运用...’，这是对教学活动的描述，而非对学生能力的可观察、可判断的掌握证据。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘理解与运用表示意志、许可的基本表达方式’，改写断言‘能理解与运用…’是对此要求的忠实转述。‘能理解与运用’描述的是学生的可观察的语言行为，而非对教学活动的描述，因此意见不成立。", "quote": "理解与运用表示意志（つもり） 、许可（Vてもいい ）的基本表达方式。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_BxbczZ63", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用语篇中的指代关系（こそあ）", "verb": "运用", "object": "语篇中的指代关系（こそあ）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读一段含「これ/それ/あれ」的短文，能指出每个词指代前文哪个事物", "听一段对话后，能说出说话人用「こちら/そちら」指代的是哪个地点或物品"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解并运用日语语篇中的指代关系（こそあ）吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.7", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用语篇中的指代关系（こそあ）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言理解与运用，非跨学科通用概念"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是将能力断言原样复述了一遍，没有提供任何可观察、可判断的具体表现或行为指标，无法证明学生是否掌握该能力。"}], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.929, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_GWGSzR34", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解常见的词语搭配（ 如\"興味を持つ\"\"傘をさす\"等）", "verb": "搭配", "object": "（ 如\"興味を持つ\"\"傘をさす\"等）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["听到「興味を持つ」或「傘をさす」等搭配时，能判断它是否自然通顺。", "给一个名词如「傘」或「興味」，能从几个动词选项中选出正确搭配的那个。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解「興味を持つ」「傘をさす」这样的常见词语搭配吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.2.1", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解常见的词语搭 配（ 如“興味を持つ”“傘をさす”等） 。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言习惯记忆，非通用概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.938, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_VbrVGYGs", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能掌握上述 400 个词中日语汉字的书写方式 （参考附录 4 词汇表）", "verb": "书写", "object": "方式 （参考附录 4 词汇表）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能听写附录4词汇表中的日语汉字，书写正确无误", "能根据读音写出对应汉字，如听到「しゅうかん」能写出「週刊」"], "assessment": "{{name}}能写出那400个词里的日语汉字吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.2.5", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "掌握上述 400 个词中日语汉字的书写方式 （参考附录 4 词汇表） 。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记汉字书写，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：“能掌握上述400个词中日语汉字的书写方式”是课程目标或教学要求，不是可观察、可判断的具体学生能力。无法据此判断一个具体孩子“会”或“不会”。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：“能掌握...书写方式”是教学目标表述，而非对学生具体行为能力的描述。能力应表述为“能正确书写XX汉字”等具体行为。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全相同，是同义反复，没有提供任何可观察、可验证的行为证据。 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘掌握上述 400 个词中日语汉字的书写方式’，改写为‘能掌握…’是忠实转述，且‘掌握书写方式’是可观察、可判断的学生能力（如通过听写、默写等评估）。", "quote": "掌握上述 400 个词中日语汉字的书写方式", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_aKvtxnTW", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能用接近正常语速和比较符合意义需求的语音、语调朗读语篇", "verb": "朗读", "object": "语篇", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能看着一段课文，用正常说话的速度和自然的语调把它读出来，不拖长音也不念得飞快。", "能读完一段话后，根据句子的意思在合适的地方停顿，语气听起来像是在表达意思而不是在念字。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能用接近正常语速和比较符合意义需求的语音、语调朗读语篇吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.3.1", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "用接近正常语速和比较符合意义需求的语音、语调朗读语篇。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言朗读技能，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.957, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_kXV7Vf8D", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述", "verb": "完成", "object": "表述", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能独立朗读一段课文，语音清晰，句读停顿基本正确，语调有起伏", "能背诵或复述一首学过的古诗，发音准确，节奏感强，带有恰当的情感"], "assessment": "{{name}}在日语作业或课堂上，能用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.3.3", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言技能，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：“比较正确的语音、语调”缺乏可操作的判断标准，无法对具体学生判定“会/不会”"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述'，断言'能用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述'是对该要求的忠实转述。意见认为缺乏可操作的判断标准，但这属于教学实施层面的讨论，不改变该能力点在课标中的存在和被要求的事实。断言本身是对课标原文的忠实改写。", "quote": "用比较正确的语音、语调完成表述", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_KL8wNPzm", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用使役态的基本语法形式（Vせる・Vさせる）", "verb": "运用", "object": "使役态的基本语法形式（Vせる・Vさせる）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用「先生が学生に本を読ませる」这类句子，正确使用使役态表达「让/使某人做某事」。", "能判断「行く」的使役态是「行かせる」，并解释为何不是「行くさせる」。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解并运用使役态（Vせる・Vさせる）的基本语法形式吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用使役态的基本语法形式（Vせる・Vさせる）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语法形式记忆与套用，非跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，没有提供可观察的行为指标，无法判断具体学生是否掌握"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘理解与运用使役态的基本语法形式’，能力断言‘能理解与运用使役态的基本语法形式’是对此的忠实转述，且‘理解与运用’本身是可观察的学习行为指标。", "quote": "理解与运用使役态的基本语法形式（Vせる・Vさせる）。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_sifXSRKk", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用被动态中的\"受害\"语法意义", "verb": "运用", "object": "被动态中的\"受害\"语法意义", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能正确变换一个表示伤害事件的句子，使其从主动句变为被动态。", "能判断一个被动态句子，是强调主语是事件受害者而非受益者。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解并运用日语被动态中的'受害'语法意义吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.3", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用被动态中的“受害”语法意义。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法理解与运用"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【已解决 2026-08-20】原异议：证据只是重述了能力断言本身，没有说明如何证明学生'能理解与运用'，例如通过什么任务、产出什么结果 —— 证据已换成起草的可观察证据（evidenceDrafted），此条不再成立。"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 undecidable（掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，没有提供可观察的行为表现或判断标准，无法据此判断一个具体学生是否掌握）：可判定闸放行、第三个判官（豆包）也没挑出问题，二比一撤销"}]}
{"id": "ca_X6zsxJb6", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用动词的命令形", "verb": "运用", "object": "动词的命令形", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能根据指令（如「站起来」「坐下」）做出相应的动作。", "能用命令形向他人发出一个简单的指令，如「看这里」或「给我」。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业中理解和运用动词的命令形吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.4", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用动词的命令形。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言规则记忆与运用，无跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.917, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_XpVetDA4", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解\"Vれる・Vられる \"表示\"尊敬\"的语法意义", "verb": "表示", "object": "\"尊敬\"的语法意义", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能听出对话中「先生が来る」和「先生が来られる」哪句是尊敬语", "能将「先生がおっしゃる」改写成用「Vれる・Vられる」形式的尊敬句"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解「Vれる・Vられる」表示尊敬的语法意义吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.6", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解“Vれる・Vられる ”表示“尊敬”的语法意义。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言知识理解，非跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，无法判断学生是否真正掌握，只是复述了断言本身"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生“理解”这一语法意义，能力断言“能理解”是忠实转述，且“理解”本身是可观察、可评估的能力。", "quote": "理解“Vれる・Vられる ”表示“尊敬”的语法意义。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_iKLEstFv", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用授受表达的敬语表达方式（Vていただく 、Vてくださる ）", "verb": "表达", "object": "的敬语表达方式（Vていただく 、Vてくださる ）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用「～ていただく」或「～てくださる」说出至少两个礼貌请求或感谢的完整句子", "能判断给出的例句中，哪句用了敬语形式的授受表达，哪句没有"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语作业里用「Vていただく」和「Vてくださる」吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.7", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用授受表达的敬语表达方式（Vていただく 、Vてくださる ）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言规则记忆与套用，非通用概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_E9USxApY", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语", "verb": "表达", "object": "逻辑关系的词语", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给一段含「しかし」「つまり」等词的日语短文，能指出这些词并说明前后句的关系。", "读一段日语文章，能解释「なお」等词在文中起到的补充或转折作用。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解日语语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["patterns"], "practice": ["analyzing-data"], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.10", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语 。如 しかも 、つまり、なお等。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别语篇逻辑关系词的模式与功能"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，无法判断学生是否真正掌握，只是复述了一遍要求"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'理解语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语'，能力断言'能理解语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语'是对此要求的忠实转述，且'能理解'是可观察的能力表现。", "quote": "理解语篇中表达逻辑关系的词语", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_gdD86aez", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用语篇中的敬体与简体", "verb": "运用", "object": "语篇中的敬体与简体", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能读一段日文对话，指出哪句是敬体、哪句是简体，并说明说话人关系", "能根据给定的对话对象（如长辈或朋友），将一段敬体句子改写成简体，或反之"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在课堂上分清并使用敬体和简体吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.1.11", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用语篇中的敬体与简体。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言形式运用，非跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.923, "facts": []}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：证据仍是兜底模板（复读断言），起草工具三次调用都没拿到可用结果。拿不出「凭什么说他会」，就不该被档案引用。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘理解与运用语篇中的敬体与简体’，改写断言‘能理解与运用语篇中的敬体与简体’是忠实的转述，且主语是学生。", "quote": "理解与运用语篇中的敬体与简体。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_P7QNFTLk", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用常见的拟声词、拟态词", "verb": "运用", "object": "常见的拟声词、拟态词", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能听声音后说出对应拟声词，如听到敲门声能说'咚咚咚'", "能用拟态词描述事物，如说'慢吞吞地走'或'亮晶晶的星星'"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业中理解和运用常见的拟声词、拟态词吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.2.1", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用常见的拟声词、拟态词。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言知识记忆与运用，非跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据原文复述了能力断言本身，没有提供可观察的学生行为表现，无法判定掌握与否"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生'理解与运用常见的拟声词、拟态词'，断言'能理解与运用常见的拟声词、拟态词'是忠实转述，且'理解与运用'本身是可观察的行为表现。", "quote": "理解与运用常见的拟声词、拟态词", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_6ArYy24w", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能掌握上述 600 个词中日语汉字的书写方式", "verb": "书写", "object": "方式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能听写或默写出课标词汇表中指定的日语汉字，笔画顺序和结构正确。", "能根据读音或词义，从给出的选项中正确写出对应的日语汉字。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能写出那600个词里的日语汉字吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "5.2.9", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "掌握上述 600 个词中日语汉字的书写方式。 （参考附录4 词汇表） 。同上。六级", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记汉字书写，无跨学科思维或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：'能掌握上述600个词中日语汉字的书写方式'是重复了能力断言本身作为证据，没有提供可观察、可判断的具体行为表现，无法据此判断一个孩子是否会。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘掌握上述 600 个词中日语汉字的书写方式’，能力断言‘能掌握上述600个词中日语汉字的书写方式’是对此要求的忠实转述，且‘掌握书写方式’本身是可观察、可判断的行为表现（如听写、默写等）。", "quote": "掌握上述 600 个词中日语汉字的书写方式。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_Sqm3ThtP", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解与运用使役被动态的用法（Vさせられる ）", "verb": "运用", "object": "使役被动态的用法（Vさせられる ）", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用「被迫做某事」的句式，将一个简单句改写成使役被动态。", "能判断一个含有「させられる」的句子，其动作执行者是被迫还是自愿。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在日语课堂或作业中正确使用使役被动态（Vさせられる）吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "6.1.1", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用使役被动态的用法（Vさせられる ）。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语法记忆与套用，非跨学科思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.923, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_Y8xwAajX", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能理解\"Vれる・Vられる \"表示\"自发\"的用法", "verb": "表示", "object": "\"自发\"的用法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给一个描述自然现象的句子，能判断出「Vれる・Vられる」是表达说话人自发的感受而非被动或可能。", "给一个使用「Vれる・Vられる」自发用法的句子，能解释其表达的是内心自然涌现的情感。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能理解“Vれる・Vられる”表示“自发”的用法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcCode": "6.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解“Vれる・Vられる ”表示“自发”的用法。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言规则理解，非跨学科或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据与能力断言完全相同，没有提供可观察的证明行为，相当于同义重复"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生“理解”这一用法，能力断言“能理解”是忠实转述，且“理解”本身是可观察的认知行为，符合能力锚点的定义。", "quote": "理解“Vれる・Vられる ”表示“自发”的用法。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_82WMU44J", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "statement": "能用比较自然的语音、语调、语速表达自己的意图和情感", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的意图和情感", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用自然的语气和语速，向同伴讲述一件自己印象深刻的事，并表达出当时的感受。", "能根据不同的交流对象（如老师、同学），调整自己的语速和语调，清晰地表达请求或想法。"], "assessment": "{{name}}在日语课堂或作业中，能用比较自然的语音、语调、语速表达自己的意图和情感吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 30, "srcCode": "6.3.3", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "用比较自然的语音、语调、语速表达自己的意图和情感。", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言表达能力，非跨学科概念或科学实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：“比较自然的语音、语调、语速”是主观描述，无法客观判断一个具体学生是否达到，缺乏可操作的判定标准。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生用比较自然的语音、语调、语速表达自己的意图和情感，能力断言是忠实转述，且表达意图和情感是可观察的言语行为，具有可操作性。", "quote": "用比较自然的语音、语调、语速表达自己的意图和情感", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用 Vている 描述图片里人物正在做的事，用 Vてある 描述桌上已备好的物品。", "能根据情景选择 Vておく 表达为将来做准备，如把伞放在门口的动作。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在作业或课堂练习里用对Vている、Vてある、Vておく这些说法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科通用概念", "splitFrom": "ca_9ARCrnE9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_8fzVCSEh", "statement": "能理解与运用动词的Vている语法形式", "verb": "运用", "object": "动词的Vている语法形式", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用 Vている 描述图片里人物正在做的事，用 Vてある 描述桌上已备好的物品。", "能根据情景选择 Vておく 表达为将来做准备，如把伞放在门口的动作。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在作业或课堂练习里用对Vている、Vてある、Vておく这些说法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科通用概念", "splitFrom": "ca_9ARCrnE9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_8StDt4m3", "statement": "能理解与运用动词的Vてある语法形式", "verb": "运用", "object": "动词的Vてある语法形式", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据中混入了Vている和Vておく的描述，与断言的Vてある不一致，且证据描述的是教学活动而非学生能力"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式’，断言‘能理解与运用动词的Vてある语法形式’是原文要求的子集，是忠实的转述。意见中提到的‘混入Vている和Vておく’是原文本身就包含的，且断言描述的是学生能力，而非教学活动。", "quote": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "语言知识内容分级", "topic": "语言知识内容分级", "dimension": "语言能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["语言能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能用 Vている 描述图片里人物正在做的事，用 Vてある 描述桌上已备好的物品。", "能根据情景选择 Vておく 表达为将来做准备，如把伞放在门口的动作。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在作业或课堂练习里用对Vている、Vてある、Vておく这些说法吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcCode": "4.1.2", "srcTopic": "语言知识内容分级", "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "语言语法学习，非跨学科通用概念", "splitFrom": "ca_9ARCrnE9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_eU2k79E4", "statement": "能理解与运用动词的Vておく语法形式", "verb": "运用", "object": "动词的Vておく语法形式", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据中‘能用 Vている 描述图片里人物正在做的事’与‘能用 Vてある 描述桌上已备好的物品’只能证明学生掌握了 Vている 和 Vてある，无法证明其掌握了 Vておく。唯一提及 Vおく 的证据是‘能根据情景选择 Vておく 表达为将来做准备，"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘理解与运用’包括Vておく在内的语法形式，能力断言‘能理解与运用动词的Vておく语法形式’是对此要求的忠实、直接的转述。意见所质疑的证据不足问题，属于对教学实践或评估方式的讨论，并不否定课标本身对该语法点的明确要求。", "quote": "理解与运用动词的Vている、Vてある 、Vておく 等语法形式。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_kXsBw7dp", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式", "verb": "归纳", "object": "推断等方式", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕非常熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的具体信息，大体把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中简单的逻辑关系。通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就非常熟悉的主题做简单的描述，大致表达自己的观点；能基于客观事实，以思辨的方式对语篇信息提出问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言不完整，缺少宾语或目标，无法判断具体能力内容，如“能通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式”做什么？"}]}
{"id": "ca_7gw8sPfQ", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力", "verb": "运用", "object": "能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕非常熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的具体信息，大体把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中简单的逻辑关系。通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就非常熟悉的主题做简单的描述，大致表达自己的观点；能基于客观事实，以思辨的方式对语篇信息提出问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力’无法对具体孩子答‘会/不会’，是口号式表述，缺乏可观测、可判断的行为指标"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据直接复述能力断言本身，没有提供任何可观测的行为或证据来证明学生达到了该能力"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "掌握证据在‘将自己的语言’处明显截断，句子不完整"}]}
{"id": "ca_G6LatVAG", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能就非常熟悉的主题做简单的描述，大致表达自己的观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就非常熟悉的主题做一段简单描述，说出自己的看法", "能围绕熟悉的主题，用简单的话说出自己的观点和理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，挑个你特别熟的话题，跟爸爸妈妈说说你的想法和理由，好吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕非常熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的具体信息，大体把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中简单的逻辑关系。通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就非常熟悉的主题做简单的描述，大致表达自己的观点；能基于客观事实，以思辨的方式对语篇信息提出问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_tvrZY8Rf", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能基于客观事实，以思辨的方式对语篇信息提出问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题", "verb": "提出", "object": "问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就所读日语语篇提出一个基于文中事实的疑问，并指出依据在文中哪处", "能针对该疑问说出自己的看法，并给出一个尝试解决的办法"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你读的这篇日语短文里，有没有哪句话让你觉得奇怪或者想问点什么？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕非常熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的具体信息，大体把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中简单的逻辑关系。通过发现中日语言的明显差异，逐步建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就非常熟悉的主题做简单的描述，大致表达自己的观点；能基于客观事实，以思辨的方式对语篇信息提出问题，阐述自己的观点并尝试解决问题。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 undecidable（能力断言是口号式表述，无法对具体学生判断'会/不会'，缺乏可观察的行为指标）：可判定闸放行、第三个判官（豆包）也没挑出问题，二比一撤销"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（断言异议已二比一撤销，但证据是兜底模板或缺家长问句 —— 先补真证据再升档）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_mzXEPKiv", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过文化比较，加深对中华文化的理解并能用所学日语简单介绍身边的人和事", "verb": "比较", "object": "加深对中华文化的理解并能用所学日语简单介绍身边的人和事", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就身边一件事说出中日做法的一处异同，并说明自己更认同哪种", "能用日语向他人介绍一位身边人的姓名、身份和一件日常事"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能举一个中日不一样的地方，再用日语说说你身边的人吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-2", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能从所接触的语篇或现象中，了解日本或其他国家在生活、人文、社会、自然等方面的情况，发现中日及其他国家文化元素的异同。对于不同文化及其背景下的行为和思维方式采取尊重和包容的态度。通过文化比较，加深对中华文化的理解并能用所学日语简单介绍身边的人和事。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "fieldIssues": ["evidence-weak"], "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "「加深对中华文化的理解」是课程目标/育人导向的表述，不是可观测的学生能力；「通过文化比较」是教学方式建议，不是能力本身。整条把目标、途径、能力混在一起，无法对一个具体孩子答会/不会。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只要求「说出中日做法的一处异同」和「介绍身边人的姓名、身份、一件日常事」，这两项都只证明语言表达与简单对比，证明不了「加深对中华文化的理解」这一半断言。"}]}
{"id": "ca_YnsTNPZM", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能在与同学和教师的互动中能借助手势、表情等非言语行为，共同完成学习任务", "verb": "完成", "object": "学习任务", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在小组完成学习任务时，用手势或表情向同学示意自己的意思，并得到同学回应后继续推进任务", "能在向教师请教或回答时，配合手势、表情把自己的想法表达清楚，使教师和同学明白并接上话"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你和同学、老师一起做任务时，会不会用手势、表情帮着把意思说明白？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "4-3", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能运用资源策略，根据情境、任务等搜集相关的学习资源并加以分析、处理。能在教师的指导下，运用调控策略，总结和反思自己的学习行为和学习过程，根据需要尝试调整学习方法、学习策略和情感态度，保持好奇心。能在教师的指导下，开展自主学习；在与同学和教师的互动中能借助手势、表情等非言语行为，共同完成学习任务。", "srcLevel": 4, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_YLDimsei", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过发现和分析中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力", "verb": "分析", "object": "中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过发现和分析中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "5-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的关键信息，把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，把握语篇中较为复杂的逻辑关系。通过发现和分析中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就熟悉的主题做较为复杂的描述，完整地表达自己的观点；能借助工具书、网络等媒介手段搜集所需信息，以思辨方式对语篇信息提出问题，运用举例、引用、推理等方法阐述自己的观点，分析并解决问题。", "srcLevel": 5, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "这是一句教学目标式的口号，无法对一个具体孩子判断「会/不会」。例如「能通过发现和分析中日语言的差异」这个过程本身无法直接观测和判定。"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "掌握证据在「语言运」处被截断，句子不完整。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供任何可观察、可验证的行为表现或成果作为证据。"}]}
{"id": "ca_kULWAvB9", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能就熟悉的主题做较为复杂的描述，完整地表达自己的观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就熟悉主题连贯说出若干句，讲清事情经过或理由", "能围绕熟悉话题表明自己的看法，并说出支持的理由"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能就熟悉的事多说几句，把想法和理由讲清楚吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "5-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的关键信息，把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，把握语篇中较为复杂的逻辑关系。通过发现和分析中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就熟悉的主题做较为复杂的描述，完整地表达自己的观点；能借助工具书、网络等媒介手段搜集所需信息，以思辨方式对语篇信息提出问题，运用举例、引用、推理等方法阐述自己的观点，分析并解决问题。", "srcLevel": 5, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_39HBabxV", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能分析并解决问题", "verb": "分析", "object": "并解决问题", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能分析并解决问题"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "5-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的关键信息，把握语篇的主要意义、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，把握语篇中较为复杂的逻辑关系。通过发现和分析中日语言的差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就熟悉的主题做较为复杂的描述，完整地表达自己的观点；能借助工具书、网络等媒介手段搜集所需信息，以思辨方式对语篇信息提出问题，运用举例、引用、推理等方法阐述自己的观点，分析并解决问题。", "srcLevel": 5, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "能力断言“能分析并解决问题”过于笼统，没有指明分析什么、解决哪类问题，无法对具体学生判断“会/不会”"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据“能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能分析并解决问题”只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供任何可观察、可验证的具体行为表现"}]}
{"id": "ca_95QX9X8H", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过文化比较，加深对中华文化的理解并以对方易于理解的方式，用所学日语简单介绍身边的中华文化现象", "verb": "比较", "object": "加深对中华文化的理解并以对方易于理解的方式，用所学日语简单介绍身边的中华文化现象", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过文化比较，加深对中华文化的理解并以对方易于理解的方式，用所学日语简单介绍身"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "5-2", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能从所接触的语篇或现象中，了解日本或其他国家在生活、人文、社会、自然等方面的情况，发现中日及其他国家文化的元素与特征，对比其异同并分析相互之间的关系。能意识到不同文化背景下的思维定势并作出判断。通过文化比较，加深对中华文化的理解并以对方易于理解的方式，用所学日语简单介绍身边的中华文化现象。", "srcLevel": 5, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘加深对中华文化的理解’是内在认知状态，无法通过外部行为判断一个孩子是否达成；‘以对方易于理解的方式’标准模糊，无法判定具体掌握程度"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "掌握证据在‘用所学日语简单介绍身’处截断，句子不完整"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供可观察、可验证的行为表现或评价标准"}]}
{"id": "ca_pzzws9t9", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提供有效信息和建设性意见", "verb": "表达", "object": "和行为方式，提供有效信息和建设性意见", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提供有效信息和建设性意"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 32, "srcCode": "5-3", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能运用资源策略，根据情境、任务等搜集并开发满足个性化学习需求的学习资源并加以分析、处理。能运用调控策略，总结、反思、评估自己的学习行为和学习过程，根据需要尝试调整学习方法、学习策略和情感态度，保持好奇心。能主动开展自主学习；在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提供有效信息和建设性意见。", "srcLevel": 5, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "这是教学建议或活动要求（合作学习中的表达方式），而非可独立观测的学生语言能力。无法对一个孩子直接判定「会/不会」这条能力。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据与能力断言几乎同义反复，只是重复了一遍断言，没有提供可验证的观测指标或行为样例。"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "掌握证据结尾明显截断（“建设性意”），句子不完整。"}]}
{"id": "ca_xtKZhvkF", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能通过发现和分析中日语言的微妙差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力", "verb": "分析", "object": "中日语言的微妙差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能通过发现和分析中日语言的微妙差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 33, "srcCode": "6-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕不太熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的关键信息与深层含义，把握语篇的意图、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中复杂的逻辑关系。通过发现和分析中日语言的微妙差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就不太熟悉的主题做有条理的描述，清晰地表达自己的观点；能借助工具书、网络等媒介手段搜集所需信息和相关资料，以思辨的方式对所获取的信息提出问题，运用举例、引用、推理等方法阐述自己的观点，尝试从多角度分析问题、解决问题。", "srcLevel": 6, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "这是对教学目标的描述，而非可观察的学生能力。无法对一个具体孩子判断其是否会‘建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力’。"}, {"type": "truncated", "detail": "掌握证据句子在‘自己的语’处被截断，意思不完整。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供任何可观察、可验证的行为证据。"}]}
{"id": "ca_wQsGtFmm", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能就不太熟悉的主题做有条理的描述，清晰地表达自己的观点", "verb": "表达", "object": "自己的观点", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能就不太熟悉的主题，用举例或引用材料的方式说出自己的观点并说明理由", "能借助工具书或网络搜集相关资料，对所获信息提出一个质疑并多角度分析"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能就一个不太熟的话题，举个例子说说你的看法和理由吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28", "ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 33, "srcCode": "6-1", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能围绕不太熟悉的主题，调动已有知识与策略，理解语篇的关键信息与深层含义，把握语篇的意图、观点和情感态度。通过梳理、归纳、推断等方式，理解语篇中复杂的逻辑关系。通过发现和分析中日语言的微妙差异，建构相应的语言知识结构并将知识转化为自己的语言运用能力。能就不太熟悉的主题做有条理的描述，清晰地表达自己的观点；能借助工具书、网络等媒介手段搜集所需信息和相关资料，以思辨的方式对所获取的信息提出问题，运用举例、引用、推理等方法阐述自己的观点，尝试从多角度分析问题、解决问题。", "srcLevel": 6, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据与能力断言完全重复，未提供任何可观察、可判断的具体行为指标，无法判断学生是否掌握）：证据已重写，复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_pDLuTvVf", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提出建设性意见，推动学习任务的顺利完成", "verb": "提出", "object": "建设性意见，推动学习任务的顺利完成", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能在日语课堂或作业情境中完成：能在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提出建设性意见，推动学"], "assessment": null, "evidenceSource": "fallback", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:review-2026-08-29"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 33, "srcCode": "6-3", "srcTopic": null, "srcCourse": null, "srcCourseNo": "", "srcText": "能运用资源策略，根据情境、任务等多渠道搜集、开发满足个性化学习需求的学习资源并加以分析、处理。能运用调控策略，总结、反思、评估自己的学习行为和学习过程，根据需要尝试调整学习方法、学习策略和情感态度，保持好奇心，形成终身学习的意识。能主动开展自主学习；在与同学的合作学习中以对方易于理解的语言表达和行为方式，提出建设性意见，推动学习任务的顺利完成。", "srcLevel": 6, "method": "gaozhong-xueye-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "该断言描述的是通用合作学习能力，无法对一个具体孩子判断其日语水平是否达标，缺乏日语学科特有的可观察行为指标"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据只是重复了能力断言本身，没有提供可验证的日语语言行为或成果作为证据"}]}
{"id": "ca_MrvhUE6m", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能了解其中所承载的文化信息", "verb": "了解", "object": "其中所承载的文化信息", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["从四级材料中挑出一个含文化信息的表达（如寒暄语、节庆用语），说出它对应的日本文化背景", "被问及该表达时，能指出它在什么场合使用、反映了什么习俗或观念"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 24, "srcText": "级别 内容要求四级况，了解其中所承载的文化信息。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_rLRtQMNt", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解语篇中内在的逻辑关系", "verb": "理解", "object": "语篇中内在的逻辑关系", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["在语篇中标出两处支撑同一观点的语句，并口头说明它们分别从哪个角度支持该观点", "针对语篇中一处结论，说出它是由前文哪两句话推导出来的，并指出推导所依据的逻辑关系（如因果、转折、递进）"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcText": "把握语篇中的语境和相应的支撑论据，理解语篇中内在的逻辑关系。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_4wiQxfPd", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能根据语篇中所体现的特有思维方式，理解作者、说话人的情感态度和价值观", "verb": "理解", "object": "作者、说话人的情感态度和价值观", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读完后能用自己的话点明作者或说话人站在哪一边、赞成什么反对什么", "能引用语篇中体现该思维方式的一处表述，说明自己为何这样判断"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 27, "srcText": "根据语篇中所体现的特有思维方式，理解作者、说话人的情感态度和价值观。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_4mJsvcU2", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能了解词的词性、词干、词尾", "verb": "了解", "object": "词的词性、词干、词尾", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给出一组词，孩子能划出词干与词尾的分界", "孩子能指着切分结果说出该词属于哪一词性"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "了解词的词性、词干、词尾，掌握基本的构词方法，推测词义，扩大词汇量。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_BpNjCJiP", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解词在语篇中的具体信息，把握意义", "verb": "理解", "object": "词在语篇中的具体信息，把握意义", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["读到语篇中某词时，能指出该词在上下文里指代的人、事或物", "能用自己的话说出该词在本句中的意思，且与上下文一致"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "理解词在语篇中的具体信息，把握意义。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_KzF8scnW", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解视听语篇中不同语气、语调所传递的信息", "verb": "理解", "object": "视听语篇中不同语气、语调所传递的信息", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["播放同一句台词的两段不同语调录音，学生分别指出说话人是请求还是命令", "听完一段对话后，学生指出说话人哪句话是反问、哪句话是陈述，并说明依据的语调特征"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "理解视听语篇中不同语气、语调所传递的信息。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_sMAnnNDe", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能掌握词汇表中日语汉字的读音 （含音读 、训读） （参考附录 4 词汇表）", "verb": "掌握", "object": "词汇表中日语汉字的读音 （含音读 、训读） （参考附录 4 词汇表）", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["教师指认词汇表中的一个汉字，学生不看注音直接读出其音读", "教师指认同一汉字，学生读出其训读并说明该读音用于哪个词"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "掌握词汇表中日语汉字的读音 （含音读 、训读） （参考附录 4 词汇表） 。级别 语法 词汇 语音五级", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_c8vgXeMc", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解多义词在具体语境中的语义", "verb": "理解", "object": "多义词在具体语境中的语义", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["给出两个含同一多义词的句子，学生分别说出该词在各句中的意思", "学生说明两处含义不同的依据是句中哪个词或哪个成分"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "理解多义词在具体语境中的语义。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_PNhJMgf9", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解词在语篇中书面语与口语的区别", "verb": "理解", "object": "词在语篇中书面语与口语的区别", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["从同一篇语篇中圈出一个书面语词和一个口语词", "指着这两个词说出哪个适合书面场合、哪个适合日常对话"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "理解词在语篇中书面语与口语的区别。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_YeWQRhNK", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能在四级的基础上 ，再熟练掌握 600个词的基本词义和用法", "verb": "掌握", "object": "600个词的基本词义和用法", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["随机抽取该600词中的20个，孩子能逐一说出其基本词义", "对抽出的词，孩子能各造一个语法与搭配均正确的句子"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "在四级的基础上 ，再熟练掌握 600个词的基本词义和用法。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_FVc6PNTE", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能理解语篇中书面语体与口语体的不同形式与意义", "verb": "理解", "object": "语篇中书面语体与口语体的不同形式与意义", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["从同一语篇中圈出两处书面语体表达和两处口语体表达，并口头指出各自属于哪种语体", "就一对同义表达（如「购买」与「买」）说出哪个用于书面语体、哪个用于口语体，并指出该词在句中的选用是否恰当"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 30, "srcText": "理解语篇中书面语体与口语体的不同形式与意义。词的恰当选用。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}
{"id": "ca_CtAC7WRq", "discipline": "日语", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能在五级的基础上 ，再熟练掌握 500个词的基本词义和用法", "verb": "掌握", "object": "500个词的基本词义和用法", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G10", "max": "G12"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["随机抽取20个新增词，学生能逐一说出一个含该词的完整句子或固定搭配", "所给句子中该词的词义与用法与课标所列义项一致，无搭配错误"], "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "by": "rule:gaozhong-rewrite", "detail": "原句层：课标原句，过不了可判定闸（知识型要求）。可判定的能力版本见由它转写的子条"}], "provenance": {"srcSubject": "日语", "srcPage": 30, "srcText": "在五级的基础上 ，再熟练掌握 500个词的基本词义和用法。", "srcCourseNo": "", "srcSection": "内容要求", "method": "gaozhong-textlayer-split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0"}