{"id": "ca_9LfvmLBE", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "个人卫生习惯养成", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "能坚持用科学的方法洗手，并独立完成洗手劳动", "verb": "坚持用...并独立完成", "object": "科学的方法洗手和洗手劳动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能在家长或老师提醒下，用流动水和肥皂按照正确步骤洗手", "能在饭前便后主动洗手，不需要大人反复催促"], "assessment": "{{name}}能在饭前便后主动用流动水和肥皂按正确步骤洗手吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "坚持用科学的方法洗手，独立完成与个人卫生相关的劳动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "习惯养成与劳动技能，非科学思维"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "坚持用科学的方法洗手，独立完成与个人卫生相关的劳动", "repair": {"why": "将合并的复杂断言拆解为两个可观察的具体行为，并调整为更符合低年级学生能力水平的表述，如‘在提醒下’、‘主动洗手’。", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：第一条证据‘能在家长或老师提醒下...洗手’与能力断言‘能坚持...并独立完成’存在矛盾。‘在提醒下完成’不能证明‘能坚持’和‘独立完成’，证据强度不足。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "课标正文标了学段且与标注一致 —— 模型的意见不能盖过课标"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘坚持用科学的方法洗手，独立完成与个人卫生相关的劳动’，能力断言‘能坚持用科学的方法洗手，并独立完成洗手劳动’是对原文的忠实转述。意见中提到的证据‘能在家长或老师提醒下...洗手’是教学实践中的具体表现，与能力断言本身并不矛盾，且断言的主语是学生，符合课标要求。", "quote": "坚持用科学的方法洗手，独立完成与个人卫生相关的劳动。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_7vvEhTiq", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "整理与收纳", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "能按照物品类别、形状等整齐摆放，初步建立及时整理与收纳的意识", "verb": "整理", "object": "与收纳的意识", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能将书桌上的书本、文具、水杯分别归位到书架、笔袋和固定位置", "能说出自己按什么标准整理了书包，并把第二天要用的物品放在门口"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你今天整理书包时，是按什么标准分类放东西的呀？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 21, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "整理自己的书包、课桌和居室的书柜及书桌，能按照物品类别、形状等整齐摆放，初步建立及时整理与收纳的意识。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：无可观察行为动词：改写成「能<动词><对象>」的形式，动词须来自 ACTION_VERBS"}}
{"id": "ca_Y54HmhT6", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "日常生活劳动", "topic": "日常简单烹饪工具使用", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "掌握日常简单烹饪工具、器皿的使用方法和注意事项", "verb": "使用", "object": "方法和注意事项", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能正确使用削皮器给土豆削皮，并说明刀口朝外的安全注意事项", "能独立用菜刀将黄瓜切成均匀的薄片，并说明使用后要立即清洗刀具"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我怎么安全地用削皮器和菜刀吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 22, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能在家庭烹饪劳动中进行简单的食材粗加工，掌握日常简单烹饪工具、器皿的使用方法和注意事项。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "学习工具使用方法与注意事项"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["investigating", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_fThJA2db", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "日常生活劳动", "topic": "果蔬加工与饮品制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "初步具有科学处理果蔬、制作饮品的意识和能力", "verb": "制作", "object": "饮品的意识和能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成水果的清洗、去皮和切块，并说出清洗的原因", "能按照步骤制作一杯果汁或水果沙拉，并邀请同伴品尝"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉大家你为什么先要洗水果，然后是怎么把它变成好喝的果汁的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 22, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "初步具有科学处理果蔬、制作饮品的意识和能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“初步具有科学处理果蔬、制作饮品的意识和能力”是一句概括性目标，无法对一个具体孩子答“会/不会”，掌握证据描述了具体行为，但断言本身不可判定。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是概括性的教学目标，未包含可观察、可判定的学生具体行为描述，无法改写为可判定的能力断言。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是概括性的教学目标，未包含可观察、可判定的学生具体行为描述，无法改写为可判定的能力断言。"}
{"id": "ca_DYVeXsYS", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "农业劳动体验", "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能表达参与农业劳动后收获的快乐，初步具有关心、照顾身边常见动植物的责任心和农业生产安全意识", "verb": "表达", "object": "参与农业劳动后收获的快乐，初步具有关心、照顾身边常见动植物的责任心和农业生产安全", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动观念", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能主动说出自己参与农业劳动时最开心的一件事，并说明为什么开心", "能主动照料身边的动植物并说出自己坚持照顾它的做法"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说种花时你做了什么让它长大的吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能表达参与农业劳动后收获的快乐，初步具有关心、照顾身边常见动植物的责任心和农业生产安全意识，知道劳动需要长期坚持的道理。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是综合素养目标，而非可直接观察和判定的具体学生能力行为。例如‘初步具有责任心和意识’、‘知道道理。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但该断言包含'农业生产安全意识'和'指出农业劳动场景的安全）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 23 页：第23页课程内容，属第21页「（一）第一学段（1～2年级）」（第二学段自第24页起），学段 G1-G9 → G1-G2"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（断言的核心是'表达参与农业劳动后收获的快乐'和'具有关心、照顾动植物的责任心'，属于情感态度目标；而掌握证据只考查'描述）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是综合素养目标，而非可直接观察和判定的具体学生能力行为。例如‘初步具有责任心和意识’、‘知道道理’等表述，无法通过一个具体行为来判定学生‘会’或‘不会’。"}}
{"id": "ca_Ccnv47tJ", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "工艺制作表达与评价", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能用文字和图画表达方案构想，能对工艺作品说出优点或改进建议", "verb": "表达、说出", "object": "方案构想、优点或改进建议", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G1"}, "evidence": ["能用简笔画和几个关键词画出自己想做的手工草图", "能指着同学的作品说出一个优点和一个改进建议"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能画出自己的想法，也能评价别人的作品吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "初步运用文字及图画表达自己的方案构想，对工艺作品进行简单的评价。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "表达方案与评价作品"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "statementBefore": "初步运用文字及图画表达自己的方案构想，对工艺作品进行简单的评价", "repair": {"why": "将断言拆分为两个可观察行为，去掉了原句中无法直接判定的‘简单的评价’，并补充了具体的证据描述。", "grounding": 0.68}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：G1-G1（一年级）要求学生‘能对工艺作品说出优点或改进建议’，这涉及评价与批判性思维，对一年级学生要求过高，与该学段‘初步体验’的目标不符"}], "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "communicating"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘对工艺作品进行简单的评价’，改写为‘能对工艺作品说出优点或改进建议’是对‘评价’这一行为的合理且具体的行为化转述，且评价本身就包含优点和改进建议两个方面，因此该断言忠实于原文，意见不成立。", "quote": "对工艺作品进行简单的评价", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_FxakAyPG", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "传统工艺制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能简单表达自己的方案构想，并使用常用工具制作简单的传统工艺作品", "verb": "制作", "object": "简单的传统工艺作品", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能口述自己的方案设计思路，并画出简单草图", "能正确使用剪刀和胶水，完成一件传统剪纸作品"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说你是怎么设计这个作品的吗？做出来的东西和你想的一样吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 23, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能简单表达自己的方案构想，并使用常用工具制作简单的传统工艺作品。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，未规定具体可观察的学生行为，且‘简单表达’‘简单制作’等表述无法判定具体学生是否达成。。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但掌握证据要求「画出简单草图」并「完成一件传统剪纸作品」，）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 23 页：第23页课程内容，属第21页「（一）第一学段（1～2年级）」（第二学段自第24页起），学段 G1-G9 → G1-G2"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，未规定具体可观察的学生行为，且‘简单表达’‘简单制作’等表述无法判定具体学生是否达成。"}}
{"id": "ca_sFzYjVv8", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "卫生工具使用与教室清扫", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "正确使用卫生工具，参与教室卫生打扫，将桌椅摆放整齐", "verb": "使用", "object": "卫生工具，参与教室卫生打扫，将桌椅摆放整齐", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用抹布将课桌表面擦拭干净并归位", "能将歪斜的椅子推入桌下并对齐排列"], "assessment": "{{name}}在打扫教室时，能自己用工具把桌椅整理得整齐又干净吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 24, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "正确使用卫生工具，参与教室卫生打扫，将桌椅摆放整齐。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_iLjBVDqD", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "个人卫生与防护", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "正确使用消毒纸巾、棉球和洗手液，在公共场所能自觉做好个人防护", "verb": "使用", "object": "消毒纸巾、棉球和洗手液，在公共场所能自觉做好个人防护", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能用洗手液按七步洗手法搓洗双手，并用流水冲洗干净", "能独立抽取消毒纸巾擦拭接触过的公共设施表面"], "assessment": "{{name}}在公园玩耍后，是否能主动用洗手液洗手并擦拭滑梯扶手？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 24, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "正确使用消毒纸巾、棉球和洗手液，在公共场所能自觉做好个人防护。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是行为要求或习惯目标，而不是可即时观察和判定的能力点。'能自觉做好个人防护'无法直接对一个具体孩。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是行为要求或习惯目标，而不是可即时观察和判定的能力点。'能自觉做好个人防护'无法直接对一个具体孩子做出'会/不会'的判定。"}}
{"id": "ca_whjNht8G", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "居家整理与收纳", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "掌握居室、教室内物品整理与收纳的方法", "verb": "整理", "object": "与收纳的方法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能按类别将书桌上的文具、书本分区摆放整齐", "能用标签或位置记忆说明每样物品的固定收纳位置"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我你的书桌或书包平时是怎么分类整理的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 24, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "掌握居室、教室内物品整理与收纳的方法，理解及时整理与收纳能让生活、学习环境变得整洁、美好的道理，初步形成热爱劳动的态度。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是章节标题式的教学目标陈述，包含‘理解道理’、‘形成态度’等非可观察的内在状态，无法直接判定一个学生‘会’或‘不会。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是章节标题式的教学目标陈述，包含‘理解道理’、‘形成态度’等非可观察的内在状态，无法直接判定一个学生‘会’或‘不会’。其具体能力已拆解到前置断言中。"}}
{"id": "ca_mPL2iHim", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "整理与收纳", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "初步具有做事有条理、整理有方法、收纳有规律的生活能力", "verb": "整理", "object": "有方法、收纳有规律的生活能力", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能按类别将书桌上的文具、书本和杂物分别归位", "能独立规划书包内物品的摆放顺序并保持整齐"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我你是怎么整理书包的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 24, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "初步具有做事有条理、整理有方法、收纳有规律的生活能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘初步具有做事有条理、整理有方法、收纳有规律的生活能力’是一句概括性描述，无法直接判断一个具体孩子‘会’或‘不会’，更像课程目标而非可测评的能力点。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是概括性课程目标，未描述可观察的具体行为或产出，无法直接判定一个具体孩子‘会’或‘不会’。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是概括性课程目标，未描述可观察的具体行为或产出，无法直接判定一个具体孩子‘会’或‘不会’。"}
{"id": "ca_PkRHAF9S", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "日常生活劳动", "topic": "家用电器使用", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "初步掌握家庭常用小电器的使用方法", "verb": "使用", "object": "方法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能在成人指导下按开关启动小电器，说出先插电后开机的顺序", "能说出用完小电器要拔掉插头，并指出说明书上的一处注意标记"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能自己用微波炉热饭或用电熨斗熨衣服吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 25, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "初步掌握家庭常用小电器的使用方法，会根据需要选择和使用，初步具有家用电器使用安全意识和器具保养维护意识，形成生活自理能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：口号句式「具有安全使用和保养维护的意识」不可判定：改写成一次可观察的行为。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（证据要求「独立操作微波炉加热饭菜并正确设置时间」「根据说明书安全使用电熨斗熨烫衣物」，涉及高温、用电安全，明显超出 G3）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：口号句式「具有安全使用和保养维护的意识」不可判定：改写成一次可观察的行为"}}
{"id": "ca_L6iTD2ZZ", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "传统工艺制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能设计并制作简单的传统工艺作品，感受传统工艺技术的精湛，以及劳动的艰辛和收获的快乐", "verb": "制作", "object": "简单的传统工艺作品，感受传统工艺技术的精湛，以及劳动的艰辛和收获的快乐", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成一件剪纸或编织作品，并说明制作步骤", "能向他人展示作品并讲述制作过程中遇到的困难及解决方法"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说做这个手工时，哪一步最难，最后是怎么完成的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 27, "srcStage": "", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能设计并制作简单的传统工艺作品，感受传统工艺技术的精湛，以及劳动的艰辛和收获的快乐，形成传承并发扬传统工艺的意识。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘感受传统工艺技术的精湛，以及劳动的艰辛和收获的快乐’是情感体验描述，无法直接判断一个具体孩子是否‘会’或‘不会’"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}
{"id": "ca_ub5qsGEk", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "社区环境维护", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "参与社区环境维护，为他人创造更好的公共空间", "verb": "参与", "object": "社区环境维护，为他人创造更好的公共空间", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动精神"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["能主动捡起社区公共区域的垃圾并投入垃圾桶", "能参与社区组织的绿化活动，如浇水或除草"], "assessment": "{{name}}在社区里有没有主动帮忙做过维护环境的事情？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 28, "srcStage": "第二学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参与社区环境维护，为他人创造更好的公共空间。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但掌握证据中「参与社区组织的绿化活动，如浇水或除草」对1–）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 28 页：第28页课程内容，属第24页「（二）第二学段（3～4年级）」（第三学段自第29页起），学段 G1-G9 → G3-G4"}]}
{"id": "ca_TDHpDw5m", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "合作劳动与劳动情感", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "初步学会与他人合作劳动，形成尊重劳动和普通劳动者的态度，以及感恩他人劳动付出的劳动情感", "verb": "合作", "object": "劳动，形成尊重劳动和普通劳动者的态度，以及感恩他人劳动付出的劳动情感", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能主动与同伴分工完成一次班级大扫除", "能在食堂用餐后主动将餐具放到回收处"], "assessment": "问问 {{name}}，在学校或家里，和谁一起做过什么事，分工是怎样的？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 28, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "初步学会与他人合作劳动，形成尊重劳动和普通劳动者的态度，以及感恩他人劳动付出的劳动情感。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘形成尊重劳动和普通劳动者的态度，以及感恩他人劳动付出的劳动情感’是情感态度目标，无法直接判断一个具体孩子‘会/不会’，更像课程目标而非可测评的能力点。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "‘能主动与同伴分工完成一次班级大扫除’证明的是合作劳动行为，但无法直接证明‘尊重劳动者’或‘感恩付出’的情感态度。证据与能力断言的后半部分不匹配。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标，包含‘形成态度’和‘情感’等无法直接观察和判定的内部状态，不符合‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的能力断言要求。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标，包含‘形成态度’和‘情感’等无法直接观察和判定的内部状态，不符合‘能+可观察动词+明确对象’的能力断言要求。"}
{"id": "ca_QBFd76pz", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "营养食谱设计", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能根据家人需求设计一顿午餐或晚餐的营养食谱", "verb": "设计", "object": "一顿午餐或晚餐的营养食谱", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能列出包含主食、蛋白质、蔬菜的三道菜名及食材用量", "能解释每道菜如何满足家人的营养需求，如蛋白质或维生素"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说你设计的这顿饭里，哪道菜是给谁准备的，为什么选它吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据家人需求设计一顿午餐或晚餐的营养食谱，了解不同烹饪方法与食物营养的关系。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "设计食谱需系统规划与结构功能匹配"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["systems", "structure-function"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_knhrhhZx", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "烹饪与营养搭配", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能进行家庭餐食的设计和营养搭配，并掌握简单的烹饪方法", "verb": "设计", "object": "和营养搭配，并掌握简单的烹饪方法", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能根据家庭成员口味和营养需求，列出一周晚餐的菜单和食材清单", "能独立完成一道家常菜（如番茄炒蛋）的清洗、切配、烹饪和装盘"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能为家人设计一顿营养均衡的晚餐并亲手做出来吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能进行家庭餐食的设计和营养搭配，并掌握简单的烹饪方法。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：课标原句'能进行家庭餐食的设计和营养搭配，并掌握简单的烹饪方法'是课程目标或教学建议的表述，并未描述一个具体的、可观察。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "课标原句'能进行家庭餐食的设计和营养搭配，并掌握简单的烹饪方法'是课程目标或教学建议的表述，并未描述一个具体的、可观察的学生能力行为。它缺少对学生具体'能做什么'的判定标准，因此无法直接修改为符合要求的能力断言。"}}
{"id": "ca_h6SjHnFH", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "日常生活劳动", "topic": "家庭电器使用", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "掌握家庭常用电器的功能特点和使用方法，在学习和操作过程中养成耐心、细心的劳动品质", "verb": "操作", "object": "过程中养成耐心、细心的劳动品质", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能独立操作微波炉加热食物并正确设置时间与火力", "能向家人说明洗衣机不同洗涤模式的适用场景"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我怎么用洗衣机洗不同衣服吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 30, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "掌握家庭常用电器的功能特点和使用方法，在学习和操作过程中养成耐心、细心的劳动品质，形成运用现代科技参与日常生活劳动的能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言后半句‘养成耐心、细心的劳动品质’是目标描述，无法直接判断一个学生是否‘养成’，属于口号式表述"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学目标描述，其中‘养成耐心、细心的劳动品质’和‘形成运用现代科技参与日常生活劳动的能力’均为长期、内化的发展性目标，无法通过单次、可观察的行为直接判定学生是否达成。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学目标描述，其中‘养成耐心、细心的劳动品质’和‘形成运用现代科技参与日常生活劳动的能力’均为长期、内化的发展性目标，无法通过单次、可观察的行为直接判定学"}
{"id": "ca_95U7Sf6v", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "生产劳动", "topic": "工业生产工具操作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法", "verb": "操作", "object": "方法", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能独立操作台钻完成给定工件的钻孔任务", "能正确使用游标卡尺测量并记录工件的关键尺寸"], "assessment": "{{name}}能独立完成一个工业生产小任务吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 32, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "台钻和游标卡尺属于机械加工专业工具，G5-G6（小学高年级）学生操作存在严重安全隐患，且课标原文对应的是初中阶段的工业生产劳动内容"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是‘掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法’，这是一个概括性的目标，未具体说明是‘哪项’工业生产项目，也未规定是哪类工具设备。要将其改为可观察、可判定的具体能力断言，必须明确具体项目和工具，但课标原句未提供这些具体信息，因此无法仅根据"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是‘掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法’，这是一个概括性的目标，未具体说明是‘哪项’工业生产项目，也未规定是哪类工具设备。要将其改为可观察、可判定的具"}
{"id": "ca_U9H5R28K", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "生产劳动", "topic": "生产劳动", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能依据简单技术图样，规范地使用常用生产工具、设备加工制作产品的模型或原型", "verb": "制作", "object": "产品的模型或原型", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能看懂图样上标注的尺寸和符号，并据此选择正确的工具进行切割或组装。", "能按照图样步骤，独立完成一个简易木质或塑料模型的搭建，且结构基本稳固。"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能给我看看你根据图样做的这个小模型吗？能说说图上哪个标记告诉你要这样做的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 32, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能依据简单技术图样，规范地使用常用生产工具、设备加工制作产品的模型或原型。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "依据图样加工，体现结构功能与建模设计"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function"], "practice": ["modeling", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 1.0, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_XAGzF3NJ", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "公益劳动与志愿服务", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "参与1~2项公益劳动与志愿服务劳动项目", "verb": "参与", "object": "1~2项公益劳动与志愿服务劳动项目", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["能说出自己参与过的至少一项公益劳动项目的名称和具体服务内容", "能在集体活动中主动承担分配的任务并完成，如捡拾垃圾、整理图书等"], "assessment": "请问{{name}}能讲讲TA参加过哪些公益劳动或志愿服务吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 34, "srcStage": "第三学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "参与1～2项公益劳动与志愿服务劳动项目。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}}
{"id": "ca_ZHdFzYw6", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "学校事务管理", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "例如：参与校园绿化环境维护、卫生监督等学校事务管理，为同学和老师提供劳动服务", "verb": "参与", "object": "校园绿化环境维护、卫生监督等学校事务管理，为同学和老师提供劳动服务", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能主动参与班级值日，完成扫地、擦黑板等任务", "能协助老师分发作业本或整理图书角书籍"], "assessment": "{{name}}在学校里会主动帮忙做些事情吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 34, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "例如：参与校园绿化环境维护、卫生监督等学校事务管理，为同学和老师提供劳动服务；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "标注学段G1-G9过宽，内容如'参与校园绿化环境维护、卫生监督'更符合中高年级（G4-G9）的组织与责任能力要求，低年级（G1-G3）学生难以独立参与此类事务管理。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "课标原句是教学建议，描述的是活动类型，不是学生能力断言。句子结构为‘参与……管理，提供……服务’，主语是课程或学校组织，并未描述学生通过学习能‘能’做什么具体行为。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：课标原句是教学建议，描述的是活动类型，不是学生能力断言。句子结构为‘参与……管理，提供……服务’，主语是课程或学校组织，并未描述学生通过学习能‘能’做什么具体行"}
{"id": "ca_uWDqaJza", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "整理与收纳", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "灵活运用整理与收纳的方法，从整体上完成对家庭各居室和教室内部物品的整理与收纳", "verb": "整理", "object": "与收纳的方法，从整体上完成对家庭各居室和教室内部物品的整理与收纳", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能对客厅物品分类，按使用频率和功能分区摆放整齐", "能独立规划教室图书角的收纳方案，并完成书籍的分类上架"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说你是怎么决定客厅东西放哪里的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 35, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.74", "srcText": "灵活运用整理与收纳的方法，从整体上完成对家庭各居室和教室内部物品的整理与收纳。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议或活动目标，描述的是学生应完成的任务，而非可直接观察和判定的能力。它没有提供判断学生‘会/不会’的具体行。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议或活动目标，描述的是学生应完成的任务，而非可直接观察和判定的能力。它没有提供判断学生‘会/不会’的具体行为标准。"}}
{"id": "ca_MiSxnuRd", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "家庭生活劳动", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "独立完成外出远行的行李箱整理与收纳，依据行程安排、天气状况准备衣物和生活用品等", "verb": "整理", "object": "与收纳，依据行程安排、天气状况准备衣物和生活用品等", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据三天行程单，将衣物、洗漱用品等分类装入行李箱并合理利用空间", "能查看目的地天气预报后，增减携带的外套或雨具等物品"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能根据行程和天气，自己把行李箱收拾好吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 35, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.74", "srcText": "独立完成外出远行的行李箱整理与收纳，依据行程安排、天气状况准备衣物和生活用品等。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}]}
{"id": "ca_pqxxNWMK", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "居室与教室美化", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能对居室或教室的美化提出创造性解决方案并制订实施方案", "verb": "提出...方案并制订", "object": "居室或教室的美化方案", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能用废旧材料设计并制作出一个新颖的笔筒或收纳盒，并解释设计思路", "能按照自己制定的计划，在15分钟内安全地完成教室一角的美化布置"], "assessment": "{{name}}能用废旧材料设计并制作出一个新颖的笔筒或收纳盒，并解释设计思路吗？", "evidenceSource": "repaired-from-source", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "SPLIT", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 35, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.74", "srcText": "能对居室和教室的美化提出具有一定创造性的解决方案，制订合理的实施方案，并能安全规范地加以实施，发展自我管理与缜密筹划的能力。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "crosscuttingWhy": "设计美化方案并规划实施"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "statementBefore": "能对居室和教室的美化提出具有一定创造性的解决方案，制订合理的实施方案，并能安全规范地加以实施", "repair": {"why": "将复合目标拆解为可观察的提出方案与制订计划，去掉了结尾的培养目标，并将‘居室和教室’改为‘居室或教室’以使判定更具体", "grounding": 1.0}, "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能对居室或教室的美化提出创造性解决方案并制订实施方案’是课程目标或章节名，无法直接判断一个具体学生是否会，需要拆解为更具体、可观察的行为表现。"}], "crosscutting": ["structure-function", "systems"], "practice": ["explaining-designing", "modeling"], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘能对居室和教室的美化提出具有一定创造性的解决方案，制订合理的实施方案’，改写后的断言‘能对居室或教室的美化提出创造性解决方案并制订实施方案’是对此的忠实转述，仅将‘和’改为‘或’并省略了部分修饰词，但核心要求一致。", "quote": "能对居室和教室的美化提出具有一定创造性的解决方案，制订合理的实施方案", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"id": "ca_yUpHmuia", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "烹饪与营养", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "独立制作午餐或晚餐中的 3~4 道菜", "verb": "制作", "object": "午餐或晚餐中的 3~4 道菜", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成洗菜、切菜、炒菜等步骤，做出3道家常菜", "能合理安排烹饪顺序，确保所有菜品在用餐时温度适宜"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能自己做一顿有3道菜的饭吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 35, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.74", "srcText": "独立制作午餐或晚餐中的 3～4 道菜。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是任务描述，不是可观察的能力断言，且未提供更具体的能力要求。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是任务描述，不是可观察的能力断言，且未提供更具体的能力要求"}}
{"id": "ca_8DQSrmYz", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "传统工艺制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能根据劳动需要设计与制作传统工艺作品", "verb": "制作", "object": "传统工艺作品", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据用途画出作品草图并列出所需材料清单", "能按图纸完成一件传统工艺作品并说明每步操作目的"], "assessment": "问问{{name}}：你做的这件作品是根据什么需要设计的？能讲讲你的想法吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 37, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据劳动需要设计与制作传统工艺作品。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句‘能根据劳动需要设计与制作传统工艺作品’是课程内容要求，属于综合性实践活动描述，未规定可具体观察、判定的学生能力行。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但「设计与制作传统工艺作品」涉及设计草图、按图纸制作并说明）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 37 页：第37页，属第35页「（四）第四学段（7～9年级）」，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句‘能根据劳动需要设计与制作传统工艺作品’是课程内容要求，属于综合性实践活动描述，未规定可具体观察、判定的学生能力行为或产出。现有证据（画草图、列清单、按图纸制作）只能证明部分环节，无法整体判定是否‘根据劳动需要’完成了‘设计与制作’。"}}
{"id": "ca_Zd7epeLC", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "生产劳动", "topic": "工业生产项目操作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "素养表现：掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法，以及加工材料的要求", "verb": "操作", "object": "方法，以及加工材料的要求", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立操作车床完成一个简单零件的车削加工", "能根据图纸要求选择合适的刀具和切削参数"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我操作这台设备时，第一步要做什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 38, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "素养表现：掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法，以及加工材料的要求。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "车床操作属于机械加工，是职业学校或高中通用技术内容，G1-G9学段（小学至初中）学生无法接触车床等工业设备，学段标注错误"}, {"type": "undecidable", "detail": "'掌握某项工业生产项目工具、设备的操作方法'是课程目标描述，不是可观察的学生能力表现，无法判断具体学生是否会"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是课程目标描述，不是可观察的学生能力表现，无法判断具体学生是否会。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是课程目标描述，不是可观察的学生能力表现，无法判断具体学生是否会。"}
{"id": "ca_CTKuJ22A", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动", "topic": "新技术应用与产品设计", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能根据需要，使用某项新技术设计制作简单的产品模型或原型，并独立完成产品的技术测试", "verb": "制作", "object": "简单的产品模型或原型，并独立完成产品的技术测试", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据产品需求从两项给定新技术中选定一项并说明选择理由", "能独立设计并完成一项技术测试，记录测试结果并判断是否达标"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能用新技术做出一个产品模型并自己测试它的效果吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 39, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "能根据需要，使用某项新技术设计制作简单的产品模型或原型，并独立完成产品的技术测试。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但该断言涉及使用新技术（3D打印笔、建模软件）设计制作产品）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 39 页：第39页，属第35页「（四）第四学段（7～9年级）」，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据仅用「3D打印笔或建模软件制作手机支架」这一具体案例，无法证明「能根据需要选择某项新技术」这一核心能力（即技术选）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}}
{"id": "ca_k8HJ7pGX", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动", "topic": "现代服务业劳动", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动", "verb": "参与", "object": "现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能描述在餐厅实习时如何接待顾客并完成点餐流程", "能说明在快递站分拣包裹时遵循的分类标准和操作步骤"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说在餐厅或快递站工作时，具体做了哪些事情吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 40, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "G1-G2学段学生无法完成餐厅实习或快递站分拣等真实现代服务业劳动，学段标注过宽"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动（开展劳动），而非学生可观察的能力断言。无法直接转化为对具体学生‘能/不能’的判定。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是教学活动（开展劳动），而非学生可观察的能力断言。无法直接转化为对具体学生‘能/不能’的判定。"}
{"id": "ca_Ai7BTVtF", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动", "topic": "现代服务业劳动", "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "参与现代服务业劳动，提升现代服务技能，充分认识现代服务业劳动的特征与独特的社会价值", "verb": "参与", "object": "现代服务业劳动，提升现代服务技能，充分认识现代服务业劳动的特征与独特的社会价值", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动观念", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能向顾客介绍一种本地服务项目（如快递、外卖、网约车）的具体内容和流程", "能模仿或完成一次完整的现代服务流程，如从接单到完成服务并请顾客确认"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说你做的这个服务（比如送外卖）是做什么的吗？它对别人有什么帮助呢？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 40, "srcStage": "全学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "参与现代服务业劳动，提升现代服务技能，充分认识现代服务业劳动的特征与独特的社会价值。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘参与现代服务业劳动，提升现代服务技能，充分认识现代服务业劳动的特征与独特的社会价值’是对整个主题的描述，无法对一个具体孩子判定‘会/不会’。"}, {"type": "stage", "detail": "‘参与现代服务业劳动’（如接单、完成服务）是实践活动，但G1-G3（1-3年级）学生不具备独立参与网约车等现代服务业的条件，该能力断言对低年级学段不适用。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "‘能向顾客介绍一种本地服务项目’是表述能力，不直接等同于‘参与’或‘认识’劳动价值；‘能模仿或完成一次完整的现代服务流程’的掌握证据与提升‘技能’、认识‘社会价值’的核心目标关联较弱。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。它是对整个学段教学主题的描述，未规定具体、可观察的学生能力行为，无法用于判定一个具体孩子‘会/不会’。"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力。它是对整个学段教学主题的描述，未规定具体、可观察的学生能力行为，无法用于判定一个具体孩子‘会/不会’。"}
{"id": "ca_xfYzUpwt", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动", "topic": "现代服务业劳动", "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说明现代服务业劳动的革新与发展趋势", "verb": "说明", "object": "现代服务业劳动的革新与发展趋势", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动观念", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能结合给定材料，指出其中一项现代服务业劳动在方式或组织上的具体变化", "能依据材料说明该变化反映出的一个发展趋势，并指出其依据"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说说现在哪些服务行业跟以前不一样了吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 40, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "了解现代服务业劳动所具备的优势与面临的挑战，能说明现代服务业劳动的革新与发展趋势。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议，描述的是课程内容目标，而非学生可观察的具体能力行为。它没有提供足够信息来构建一个能对具体孩子判定‘会/。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（「现代服务业劳动的革新与发展趋势」属于劳动课标中高年级（7-9年级）服务性劳动的）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 40 页：第40页，属第35页「（四）第四学段（7～9年级）」，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据只要求「列举两种现代服务业并说明与传统服务的区别」「描述一个未来发展方向」，这只能证明学生知道几个服务行业名称和）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议，描述的是课程内容目标，而非学生可观察的具体能力行为。它没有提供足够信息来构建一个能对具体孩子判定‘会/不会’的能力断言。"}}
{"id": "ca_2AdH7Npu", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "社区服务与公益劳动", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "参与社区环境治理，进行社区公园环境优化、公共健身设施维护等", "verb": "参与", "object": "社区环境治理，进行社区公园环境优化、公共健身设施维护等", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能就社区公园环境问题提出一条改进建议并说明理由", "能参与一次公园环境优化或健身设施维护活动并说出自己做的部分"], "assessment": "{{name}}在公园玩的时候，会主动清理垃圾并按类别扔进垃圾桶吗？", "evidenceSource": "evidence-drafted", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 41, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参与社区环境治理，进行社区公园环境优化、公共健身设施维护等；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句“参与社区环境治理，进行社区公园环境优化、公共健身设施维护等”是宏观的活动建议或教育目标描述，而非具体、可观察、可。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但「参与社区环境治理」「社区公园环境优化」属于服务性劳动中）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 41 页：第41页，属第35页「（四）第四学段（7～9年级）」，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}, {"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "原异议 evidence-weak（掌握证据「能主动捡拾公园垃圾并分类投放」只能证明个人卫生/垃圾分类习惯，证明不了「参与社区环境治理、进行社区公园环境优化）：带着这条意见重写证据，复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句“参与社区环境治理，进行社区公园环境优化、公共健身设施维护等”是宏观的活动建议或教育目标描述，而非具体、可观察、可判定的单个学生能力行为。它未规定学生在这些活动中应“能”做到何种具体操作，因此无法提炼出符合“能+可观察动词+明确对象”格"}}
{"id": "ca_mFpC6WRb", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "公益劳动与志愿服务", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "参与社区公共卫生服务，进行疫情防控宣讲等", "verb": "参与", "object": "社区公共卫生服务，进行疫情防控宣讲等", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质", "劳动观念"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能向社区居民讲解正确佩戴口罩的步骤", "能演示七步洗手法并说明每个步骤的要点"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能给家人讲讲怎么正确戴口罩和洗手吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 41, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "1.00", "srcText": "参与社区公共卫生服务，进行疫情防控宣讲等。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（疫情防控宣讲、向社区居民讲解佩戴口罩和七步洗手法，属于服务性劳动中的社区服务，需）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 41 页：第41页，属第35页「（四）第四学段（7～9年级）」，学段 G1-G9 → G7-G9"}]}
{"id": "ca_gqFzPR3v", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "工艺制作与农业劳动", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "在简单的工艺制作劳动、农业劳动中，初步掌握简单的手工技能", "verb": "制作", "object": "劳动、农业劳动中，初步掌握简单的手工技能", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成一个简单的纸杯手工制作，如剪裁、粘贴成笔筒", "能按照步骤将种子埋入土中并完成浇水，动作准确有序"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能自己动手做个小手工或种下小种子吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "在简单的工艺制作劳动、农业劳动中，初步掌握简单的手工技能，会使用简单的工具，能照顾身边常见的动植物。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写后仍不过可判定性闸：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但该断言实际对应1–2年级（第一学段）的工艺制作与农业劳动）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 42 页：第42页表1劳动素养要求「第一学段（1～2年级）」劳动能力句，学段 G1-G9 → G1-G2"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写后仍不过可判定性闸：并列项过多（≥3 个顿号）：一个锚点只承载一条可判定能力，请拆分"}}
{"id": "ca_XAaUhxPM", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "工具使用", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "会使用简单的工具", "verb": "使用", "object": "简单的工具", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["能用螺丝刀拧紧松动的螺丝", "能正确使用订书机装订几张纸"], "assessment": "您家{{name}}平时会用螺丝刀或订书机这类简单工具吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "NO_STAGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 42, "srcStage": "第一学段", "srcAgree": "0.99", "srcText": "在简单的工艺制作劳动、农业劳动中，初步掌握简单的手工技能，会使用简单的工具，能照顾身边常见的动植物。", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "stageFixedFrom": "G1-G9"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "stageFix": "按课程方案开设年级裁剪", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 62% < 62%），不采纳。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审只挑了字段问题，进 disputed 排队"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "复审提了 stage（标注学段为G1–G9，但掌握证据中的「能用螺丝刀拧紧松动的螺丝」涉及工具操作与用）→ 按原件裁决：课标原件 PDF 第 42 页：第42页表1劳动素养要求「第一学段（1～2年级）」劳动能力句，学段 G1-G9 → G1-G2"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "改写脱离课标原句（字面覆盖 62% < 62%），不采纳"}}
{"id": "ca_Zqeerk3q", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "日常生活劳动实践", "dimension": "劳动习惯和品质", "statement": "通过持续参与日常生活劳动、生产劳动和服务性劳动", "verb": "参与", "object": "日常生活劳动、生产劳动和服务性劳动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能连续一周每天主动整理自己的房间并保持整洁", "能独立完成一次家庭聚餐的食材采购和简单烹饪"], "assessment": "{{name}}最近一周有没有主动做家务，或者帮忙准备过一顿饭？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 44, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.98", "srcText": "通过持续参与日常生活劳动、生产劳动和服务性劳动，理解劳动创造美好生活的道理，增强家庭责任意识，认识到劳动对国家富强、人类发展的意义，尊重和平等对待各行各业的劳动者，自觉向优秀劳动榜样学习；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "断言是‘通过持续参与…’，这是一个过程描述，不是可判断的能力点；掌握证据描述的是具体行为，但断言本身无法用‘会/不会’回答"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学目标描述（通过...理解...增强...认识...），不是可观察的学生能力断言，无法用‘会/不会’判定"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学目标描述（通过...理解...增强...认识...），不是可观察的学生能力断言，无法用‘会/不会’判定"}
{"id": "ca_HKWZvBp3", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "家政技能应用", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "比较熟练地运用家政技能", "verb": "比较", "object": "熟练地运用家政技能", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力", "劳动习惯和品质"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能独立完成一次完整的衣物洗涤并整理晾晒", "能正确使用吸尘器打扫房间并清理尘杯"], "assessment": "你可以观察{{name}}做一次家务，看他/她能否独立完成这些步骤？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 44, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.98", "srcText": "（劳动观念）在具有一定挑战性的日常生活劳动中，比较熟练地运用家政技能，提高生活自理能力；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "“比较熟练地运用家政技能”是一句概括性描述，无法直接判断单个学生“会/不会”，需要分解为具体技能点进行评估。"}, {"type": "evidence-weak", "detail": "掌握证据仅列举了“衣物洗涤整理”和“吸尘器使用”两项，无法充分证明“比较熟练地运用”这个涵盖范围更广的能力断言。"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}, "dropReason": "课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句只是教学建议，不含学生能力"}
{"id": "ca_Qhf4sBaF", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "木工工艺制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "以木工工艺作品设计与制作项目为例:5~6年级，可确定项目目标为\"学会识读简单木工工艺作品图样，选择合适的手工工具和技术", "verb": "制作", "object": "项目为例:5~6年级，可确定项目目标为\"学会识读简单木工工艺作品图样，选择合适的", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据提供的简单木工图样，正确说出所需工具的名称和用途", "能按步骤完成图样指定的榫卯连接，并解释其作用"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着图纸选对工具，并做出图里的榫卯结构吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "以木工工艺作品设计与制作项目为例：5～6年级，可确定项目目标为“学会识读简单木工工艺作品图样，选择合适的手工工具和技术，制作简单木工工艺作品，感受作品完成后的喜悦与成就感，形成安全劳动、规范操作的意识”；", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "stage", "detail": "标注学段为G7–G9，但能力断言明确写了'5~6年级'，两者矛盾，应核实该能力在课标中对应的具体学段。"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "'以木工工艺作品设计与制作项目为例:5~6年级，可确定项目目标为…'这句是教学建议或目标设定示例，不是学生能力描述，学生能力应描述'能做什么'。"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_6tM3vU6e", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "木工工艺图样", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能够根据需求，识读并绘制简单木工工艺作品图样", "verb": "绘制", "object": "简单木工工艺作品图样", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据文字需求，用铅笔在图纸上画出桌子的三视图草图并标注尺寸", "能看懂一张简单的木凳图纸，并准确说出其主要部件的名称和大致形状"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能看着这个木凳图纸，告诉我它由哪几部分组成吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "ai:doubao-seed-2-0-pro-2026-09-28"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "JUDGE", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "7～9年级，可确定项目目标为“能够根据需求，识读并绘制简单木工工艺作品图样，设计并加工简单的木工工艺作品模型或原型，体会作品的创", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split", "leadStripped": "~9年级，可确定项目目标为\""}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "by": "ai:deepseek-v4-1-flash-2026-09-28", "detail": "撤销弃用（2026-09-28）。原弃用理由：课标原句本身是口号或教学建议，不含可判定的学生能力，修不出来：原句是教学建议（可确定项目目标），描述的是教师活动而非学生能力，且‘体会作品的创’不完整，无法提取出可判定的学生能力断。复查：可判定闸放行、断言忠于课标原句、另一个模型复审未挑出问题"}], "repairAttempt": {"fixable": false, "why": "原句是教学建议（可确定项目目标），描述的是教师活动而非学生能力，且‘体会作品的创’不完整，无法提取出可判定的学生能力断言。"}}
{"id": "ca_iMZE2skR", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": null, "topic": "木工工艺制作", "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "设计并加工简单的木工工艺作品模型或原型，体会作品的创", "verb": "设计", "object": "并加工简单的木工工艺作品模型或原型，体会作品的创", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "掌握", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["能根据草图选好木料并用锯子锯出所需形状", "能使用砂纸将作品表面打磨光滑并展示成品"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能告诉我是怎么把木头变成你设计的样子的吗？", "evidenceSource": "llm-draft", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "triageBucket": "READY", "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 45, "srcStage": "第四学段", "srcAgree": "0.00", "srcText": "7～9年级，可确定项目目标为“能够根据需求，识读并绘制简单木工工艺作品图样，设计并加工简单的木工工艺作品模型或原型，体会作品的创", "method": "vlm-transcribe+split"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "undecidable", "detail": "‘设计并加工简单的木工工艺作品模型或原型’是章节标题而非具体能力，无法判断特定学生是否会"}, {"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "‘体会作品的创’不是学生能力描述，是教学意图或情感目标，且句子不完整"}], "dropReason": "AI 判定不是学生能力（教学建议/课程目标）"}
{"id": "ca_K8pB26kL", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出用笤帚扫地、用拖把拖地、用抹布擦桌椅是简单的清洁劳动", "verb": "说出", "object": "用笤帚扫地、用拖把拖地、用抹布擦桌椅是简单的清洁劳动", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["问：用笤帚扫地、用拖把拖地、用抹布擦桌椅是简单的清洁劳动是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出用笤帚扫地、用拖把拖地、用抹布擦桌椅是简单的清洁劳动吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "开展简单的清洁劳动，用笤帚扫地，用拖把拖地，用抹布擦桌椅等", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类描述，无跨学科思维或实践动作", "srcPage": 21, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.826, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_VKfEbZUn", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能选择当地1~2种常见蔬菜进行种植", "verb": "选择", "object": "当地1~2种常见蔬菜", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["学生能从提供的蔬菜列表中选出1-2种", "学生能说明选择的蔬菜是当地常见的"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出当地1~2种常见蔬菜的名称吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "选择当地1～2种常见的蔬菜，如大白菜、西红柿、黄瓜等进行种植", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别作物生长规律，设计种植方案", "srcPage": 26, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["patterns", "systems"], "practice": ["investigating", "explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "grounded-verbatim", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.923, "facts": []}, "statementBefore": "能说出当地1~2种常见蔬菜的名称", "repair": {"kind": "undegrade", "why": "原文要求学生『选择』蔬菜进行种植，这是一个可观察的行为动词，产出是选择行为本身。", "grounding": 1.0, "srcVerbs": []}}
{"id": "ca_3gci6TRV", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出1~2项传统工艺制作项目的名称", "verb": "说出", "object": "1~2项传统工艺制作项目的名称", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：1~2项传统工艺制作项目的名称是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出1~2项传统工艺制作项目的名称吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "选择1～2项传统工艺制作项目，如纸工、泥工、布艺、编织等，了解制作的技能和方法。识读简单的示意图，尝试设计", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "仅要求说出名称，无思维或实践要求", "srcPage": 26, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.714, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_uwB4xSJh", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出公益劳动与志愿服务的主要场所是校园和社区", "verb": "说出", "object": "公益劳动与志愿服务的主要场所是校园和社区", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：公益劳动与志愿服务的主要场所是校园和社区是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出公益劳动与志愿服务的主要场所是校园和社区吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "以校园、社区为主，参加1～2项力所能及的公益劳动与志愿服务", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记性知识，无跨学科思维或实践动作", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.739, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_e5OzZjGo", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出担任学校校史馆小向导的工作内容是向访客介绍学校历史", "verb": "说出", "object": "担任学校校史馆小向导的工作内容是向访客介绍学校历史", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：担任学校校史馆小向导的工作内容是向访客介绍学校历史是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出担任学校校史馆小向导的工作内容是向访客介绍学校历史吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "担任学校校史馆小向导，向访客介绍学校历史等", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类任务，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.609, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_DnwSarZF", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出担任运动会、艺术节等学校重大活动志愿者的工作是作出自己的贡献", "verb": "说出", "object": "担任运动会、艺术节等学校重大活动志愿者的工作是作出自己的贡献", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：担任运动会、艺术节等学校重大活动志愿者的工作是作出自己的贡献是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出担任运动会、艺术节等学校重大活动志愿者的工作是作出自己的贡献吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "担任运动会、艺术节等学校重大活动的志愿者，作出自己的贡献", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述性陈述，无思维训练或实践动作", "srcPage": 28, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.857, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_prQJ1jUm", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出参与社区环境维护的目的是为他人创造更好的公共空间", "verb": "说出", "object": "参与社区环境维护的目的是为他人创造更好的公共空间", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "evidence": ["问：参与社区环境维护的目的是为他人创造更好的公共空间是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出参与社区环境维护的目的是为他人创造更好的公共空间吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "参与社区环境维护，为他人创造更好的公共空间", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "陈述目的，非科学思维或实践"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "dropReason": "改写凭空造出「X的作用/目的是Y」这类关系，原文没有这个判断。接地校验查不出来 —— 编的是关系不是词，字面覆盖率照样很高。"}
{"id": "ca_1t93SyDv", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "verb": "说出", "object": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "劳动技能，非科学思维或实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.857, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_z7sT0Ak8", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤是家常菜的例子", "verb": "说出", "object": "西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤是家常菜的例子", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤是家常菜的例子是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤是家常菜的例子吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "列举实例，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.714, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_HKyqEM9P", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出科学膳食与身体健康的关系是密切的", "verb": "说出", "object": "科学膳食与身体健康的关系是密切的", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：科学膳食与身体健康的关系是密切的是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出科学膳食与身体健康的关系是密切的吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-adjudicated", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "了解科学膳食与身体健康密切关系", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "理解饮食与健康的因果关系", "srcPage": 35, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["cause-effect"], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "passed", "overlap": 1.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.722, "facts": ["了解科学膳食与身体健康密切关系"]}}
{"id": "ca_eBJdB333", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出现代服务业劳动的特征与过程是开展符合相应要求的劳动的依据", "verb": "说出", "object": "现代服务业劳动的特征与过程是开展符合相应要求的劳动的依据", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：现代服务业劳动的特征与过程是开展符合相应要求的劳动的依据是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出现代服务业劳动的特征与过程是开展符合相应要求的劳动的依据吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动。", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "理解结构功能与系统，设计符合要求的劳动", "srcPage": 40, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": ["structure-function", "systems"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.815, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_zAClpkyr", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出生态系统维护、公共卫生等是学校、社区环境中存在的实际问题", "verb": "说出", "object": "生态系统维护、公共卫生等是学校、社区环境中存在的实际问题", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：生态系统维护、公共卫生等是学校、社区环境中存在的实际问题是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出生态系统维护、公共卫生等是学校、社区环境中存在的实际问题吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "引导学生主动发现学校、社区环境中存在的实际问题，如生态系统维护、公共卫生等问题", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别并界定现实问题"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["asking-questions"], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_3k72mWsd", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出在特殊教育学校做课堂教学助理、学习伙伴等是帮助需要帮助的群体的一种形式", "verb": "说出", "object": "在特殊教育学校做课堂教学助理、学习伙伴等是帮助需要帮助的群体的一种形式", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "evidence": ["问：在特殊教育学校做课堂教学助理、学习伙伴等是帮助需要帮助的群体的一种形式是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出在特殊教育学校做课堂教学助理、学习伙伴等是帮助需要帮助的群体的一种形式吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "引导学生主动帮助需要帮助的群体，如在特殊教育学校做课堂教学助理、学习伙伴等", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述角色认知，非思维或实践训练"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"id": "ca_gD92Ny91", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": null, "statement": "能说出\"自己的事情自己做\"是劳动习惯和品质", "verb": "说出", "object": "\"自己的事情自己做\"是劳动习惯和品质", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": [], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G1", "max": "G2"}, "evidence": ["问：\"自己的事情自己做\"是劳动习惯和品质是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出\"自己的事情自己做\"是劳动习惯和品质吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": ["ai:extraction-pipeline"], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "adjudication": {"by": "ai", "basis": ["来源：课标【内容要求】原文，非模型自由生成", "过可判定性闸 + 命题闸（须是有标准答案的命题，不能是主题）", "接地校验：改写与原句字面覆盖 ≥62%"], "pendingObjection": true, "note": "用户授权「AI 先判、人有异议再改」。教师复核后应改判为 expert-confirmed 或 disputed。", "downgradedBy": "独立验证：模型只读原文（看不到本断言）时，抽不出任何支持它的事实。可能只是角度不同（实测误报率约 17%），所以降级而不是弃用，交由人判。"}, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "初步养成“自己的事情自己做”、认真负责、有始有终的劳动习惯和品质", "method": "curriculum-content-rewrite", "crosscuttingWhy": "陈述习惯，无跨学科思维或实践动作"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "overlap": 0.0, "facts": [], "passed": false}, "dropReason": "原文是面向教师的表述（教学重点/教学建议/引导学生…），主语不是学生，抽成儿童能力锚点属主语错位"}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}，你能说出用简单的炒、煎、炖等方法做的两三道家常菜吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "劳动技能，非科学思维或实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_4BYxBipj", "statement": "能说出用简单的炒的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "verb": "说出", "object": "用简单的炒的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能说出用简单的炒的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜’是教学内容或活动描述，不是学生能力。能力应表述为‘能运用炒的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜’或‘能说出炒的操作要点’。"}, {"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据‘问：用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么？能答出即为会’是要求复述定义或概念，无法证明学生具备‘制作’的实际操作能力。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜’。改写后的断言‘能说出用简单的炒的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜’是忠实转述，且‘能说出’是可观察的言语行为，属于能力范畴。", "quote": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出用简单的煎的方法制作2~3道家常菜吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "劳动技能，非科学思维或实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_tUpsUu5v", "statement": "能说出用简单的煎的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "verb": "说出", "object": "用简单的煎的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能说出用简单的煎的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜’是课程内容要求，不是学生能力。能力应是‘能用煎的方法制作2~3道家常菜’。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜’，其中‘煎’是明确列出的烹饪方法之一。断言‘能说出用简单的煎的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜’是对原文要求的忠实转述，且‘能说出’是可观察的能力行为。", "quote": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "KNOWLEDGE", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "了解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "evidence": ["问：用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么？能答出即为会", "答案与课标原文一致，不要求逐字复述"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出用简单的炖的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜是什么吗？", "evidenceSource": "curriculum-content", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "provenance": {"srcSubject": "劳动", "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "method": "atomize/atomize-substring", "crosscuttingWhy": "劳动技能，非科学思维或实践", "srcPage": 29, "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "id": "ca_rA6qnP83", "statement": "能说出用简单的炖的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "verb": "说出", "object": "用简单的炖的烹饪方法制作2~3道家常菜", "reviewedBy": []}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能描述炒菜时需要大火快炒、不断翻动", "学生能说明炖汤时需要小火慢炖、保持汤汁微沸"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出炒菜时要大火快炒、炖汤时要小火慢炖吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将关于烹饪方法的知识，转化为可观察、可复述的操作要点描述。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述操作要点属于建构解释", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_rnMsnSd5"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_7uJkt5Af", "statement": "能说出炒的操作要点", "verb": "说出", "object": "炒的操作要点", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据中‘炖汤时需要小火慢炖、保持汤汁微沸’证明的是‘炖’的操作要点，不是‘炒’的操作要点，与断言不对应"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作家常菜’。要使用‘炒’这种方法进行制作，必然要求学生掌握炒的操作要点。断言‘能说出炒的操作要点’是对课标要求的一种忠实、具体的能力转述。提意见者纠结于证据中关于‘炖’的具体描述，但忽略了断言本身是针对课标中‘炒’这一明确要求的。", "quote": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能描述炒菜时需要大火快炒、不断翻动", "学生能说明炖汤时需要小火慢炖、保持汤汁微沸"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出炒菜时要大火快炒、炖汤时要小火慢炖吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将关于烹饪方法的知识，转化为可观察、可复述的操作要点描述。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述操作要点属于建构解释", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_rnMsnSd5"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_DfsYKb5z", "statement": "能说出煎的操作要点", "verb": "说出", "object": "煎的操作要点", "reviewedBy": [], "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：掌握证据描述的是炒菜和炖汤的操作要点，与能力断言‘煎的操作要点’不匹配，无法证明学生掌握了煎的能力"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生掌握‘煎’的烹饪方法，能力断言‘能说出煎的操作要点’是对这一要求的合理转述，且‘能说出’是可观察的行为。", "quote": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}
{"discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能描述炒菜时需要大火快炒、不断翻动", "学生能说明炖汤时需要小火慢炖、保持汤汁微沸"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出炒菜时要大火快炒、炖汤时要小火慢炖吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv", "method": "capability-rewrite/atomize-substring", "why": "这条能力要求学生将关于烹饪方法的知识，转化为可观察、可复述的操作要点描述。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述操作要点属于建构解释", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate", "splitFrom": "ca_rnMsnSd5"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "id": "ca_aLiwzE69", "statement": "能说出炖的操作要点", "verb": "说出", "object": "炖的操作要点", "reviewedBy": []}