{"id": "ca_E4ZyPrEL", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出两种传统工艺制作项目的名称及其主要材料", "verb": "说出", "object": "两种传统工艺制作项目的名称及其主要材料", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能说出‘纸工’和‘泥工’这两个项目名称", "学生能说出纸工的主要材料是纸，泥工的主要材料是泥"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出纸工和泥工这两个项目名称，以及它们各自的主要材料吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_3gci6TRV", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生基于‘知道项目名称’的知识，进一步说出项目的名称和对应的主要材料，这是一个可观察、可判定的具体行为。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 26, "srcText": "选择1～2项传统工艺制作项目，如纸工、泥工、布艺、编织等，了解制作的技能和方法。识读简单的示意图，尝试设计", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.455, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_JHBx8WZa", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动观念", "statement": "能说出校园和社区中1-2项具体的公益劳动与志愿服务活动", "verb": "说出", "object": "校园和社区中1-2项具体的公益劳动与志愿服务活动", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动观念"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G3", "max": "G4"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能回答：“我在学校参与了图书整理，在社区参与了垃圾分类宣传。”", "学生能列举：“校园大扫除是公益劳动，去敬老院陪伴老人是志愿服务。”"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出校园和社区里一两项具体的公益劳动或志愿服务活动吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_uwB4xSJh", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生基于‘主要场所是校园和社区’的知识，将其具体化为可列举的活动实例，而非仅仅复述场所。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 28, "srcText": "以校园、社区为主，参加1～2项力所能及的公益劳动与志愿服务", "crosscuttingWhy": "识记类表述，无思维或实践动作", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.696, "facts": []}}
{"id": "ca_rnMsnSd5", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能说出炒、煎、炖三种烹饪方法的操作要点", "verb": "说出", "object": "炒、煎、炖三种烹饪方法的操作要点", "type": "PROCEDURAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "应用", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能描述炒菜时需要大火快炒、不断翻动", "学生能说明炖汤时需要小火慢炖、保持汤汁微沸"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出炒菜时要大火快炒、炖汤时要小火慢炖吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_1t93SyDv", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生将关于烹饪方法的知识，转化为可观察、可复述的操作要点描述。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "crosscuttingWhy": "描述操作要点属于建构解释", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "not-applicable", "overlap": 0.0, "verbatimCoverage": 0.529, "facts": []}, "composite": true, "fieldIssues": ["composite"]}
{"id": "ca_RsG3h5Az", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能从菜单或食谱中识别出至少两种属于炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法的家常菜", "verb": "识别", "object": "属于特定烹饪方法的家常菜", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G5", "max": "G6"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["在看到一份包含多种烹饪方式的菜单时，能正确圈出或指出其中属于炒、煎或炖的菜肴。", "在阅读一份食谱时，能说出该食谱采用的烹饪方法（如炖）并指出它属于家常菜。"], "assessment": "{{name}}能从菜单里圈出炒、煎或炖的家常菜吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "disputed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": true, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": [], "practice": [], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_z7sT0Ak8", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生将‘炒、煎、炖是家常菜的烹饪方法’这一知识，应用到对具体菜谱或菜单的识别判断中，旁观者可以通过观察他能否正确归类菜式来判定。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 29, "srcText": "用简单的炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法制作2～3道家常菜，如西红柿炒鸡蛋、煎鸡蛋、炖骨头汤等，参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程。", "crosscuttingWhy": "识别菜名，无跨学科思维或科学实践", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "not-a-capability", "detail": "能力断言描述的是对烹饪方法的识别和分类，属于劳动技能或认知范畴，而非劳动观念。劳动观念应侧重对劳动价值、意义、态度的认识。"}], "dropReason": "AI 裁决：异议成立。课标原文要求学生“参与从择菜、洗菜到烧菜、装盘的完整过程”，核心是动手实践。改写后的断言“能从菜单或食谱中识别出至少两种属于炒、煎、炖等烹饪方法的家常菜”仅停留在认知识别层面，将“做菜”的实践能力降格为“认菜”的分类能力，未能忠实反映原文的实践要求。（裁决者看得到课标原文，挑错者看不到 —— 见 tools/adjudicate.py）"}
{"id": "ca_SXTadM6g", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能举例说明至少两种膳食选择如何影响身体健康", "verb": "举例说明", "object": "膳食选择对身体健康的影响", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["学生能说出‘多吃蔬菜水果有助于增强免疫力’", "学生能解释‘长期高盐饮食可能导致高血压’"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出哪些膳食选择会影响身体健康吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["cause-effect", "matter-energy"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_HKyqEM9P", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生运用‘科学膳食与身体健康关系密切’的知识，具体举例说明膳食选择如何影响身体健康，这是可观察和判定的。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 35, "srcText": "了解科学膳食与身体健康密切关系", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析饮食对健康的影响机制", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "independentCheck": {"method": "模型只读原文（看不到本断言）自行抽事实，再机械比对实词覆盖", "verdict": "suspect", "overlap": 0.3, "verbatimCoverage": 0.286, "facts": ["了解科学膳食与身体健康密切关系"]}, "fieldIssues": ["independent-check-suspect"]}
{"id": "ca_X7i4gijR", "discipline": "劳动", "track": "MATRIX", "strand": "劳动观念", "topic": null, "dimension": "劳动能力", "statement": "能根据现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，说明其对劳动要求的规定", "verb": "说明", "object": "现代服务业劳动的特征与过程对劳动要求的规定", "type": "CONCEPTUAL", "literacy": ["劳动能力"], "cognitive": "理解", "stageHint": {"min": "G7", "max": "G9"}, "courseType": null, "evidence": ["能指出‘线上客服’的劳动特征（如实时响应）如何决定了对沟通效率的具体要求", "能解释‘物流配送’的劳动过程（如分拣、运输）为何需要遵循特定的时效和安全规范"], "assessment": "{{name}}能说出‘线上客服’为什么需要实时响应，以及‘物流配送’为什么要有明确的时效和安全规范吗？", "evidenceSource": "capability-rewrite", "reviewStatus": "ai-reviewed", "reviewedBy": [], "deprecated": false, "supersededBy": null, "crosscutting": ["systems", "cause-effect"], "practice": ["explaining-designing"], "provenance": {"derivedFrom": "ca_eBJdB333", "method": "capability-rewrite", "why": "这条能力要求学生运用已知的现代服务业劳动的特征与过程知识，来解释它们如何具体地规定了劳动要求，这是一个可观察的说明行为。", "srcSubject": "劳动", "srcPage": 40, "srcText": "根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动。", "crosscuttingWhy": "分析服务业系统特征与因果要求", "srcPageFrom": "extract-intermediate"}, "schemaVersion": "0.1.0", "aiIssues": [{"type": "resolved", "detail": "【裁决为不成立】原异议：‘能根据现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，说明其对劳动要求的规定’是任务描述而非可判定的能力断言，无法对一个具体孩子答‘会/不会’；掌握证据中的‘能指出’‘能解释’是更具体的能力断言，应使用这些作为最终能力条目。"}], "adjudication": {"verdict": "overrule", "why": "课标原文明确要求学生‘根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动’。能力断言‘能根据现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，说明其对劳动要求的规定’是对这一要求的忠实转述，将‘开展劳动’具体化为‘说明其对劳动要求的规定’，这是可观察、可判定的能力表现。", "quote": "根据所参与现代服务业劳动的特征与过程，开展符合相应要求的劳动。", "method": "裁决者看课标原文，挑错者看不到；引文逐字核对过"}}